this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2024
1053 points (97.3% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

27409 readers
3577 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Tgo_up@lemm.ee 155 points 1 month ago (8 children)

How tf can killing a single person with a handgun be classified as terrorism?

[–] codexarcanum@lemmy.dbzer0.com 128 points 1 month ago

Because the ruling class is terrified

[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 107 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Because they don't like him.

I mean Dylan fucking Roof shot dead 9 black people and they didn't consider it terrorism.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 65 points 1 month ago

"They're making us CEO's afraid, terrified even, so he's clearly a terrorist. The implication that the working class could actually fight back against the systemic oppression we inflict on them? That's horrifying. We can't allow them to believe they could ever fight back. Make an example of this person."

The rich assholes or something

[–] mrslt@lemmy.world 38 points 1 month ago

Crimes against the ruling class are more harshly punished than crimes against the plebs.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 145 points 1 month ago (4 children)

So this is terrorism but they refuse to give terrorism charges to local militias?

[–] JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee 117 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They also don't charge people who blow up abortion clinics with terrorism either. They haven't since the 60s - 70s.

If you look it up the courts have been petitioned several times to associate abortion clinic bombings with Christian terrorism but they keep refusing to call it what it is.

After reading about that fiasco I have very little faith our government actually has a working definition of terrorism that doesn't shift at their convenience.

[–] mortemtyrannis@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 month ago

Hardly shocking that the christofascist courts of America refuse to classify abortion clinic bombings as domestic terrorism.

[–] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Local militias are perfectly acceptable as per the second amendment, as long as they're "well regulated", whatever that means...

[–] unknown1234_5@kbin.earth 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

it means that it needs to be an actual maintained organization, not Jim bob and his buddies threatening anybody they don't like. it's also not a requirement, it's only the reasoning provided.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 133 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The dead guy was the terrorist.

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 34 points 1 month ago (5 children)
[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 44 points 1 month ago

fine "Domestic" terrorist

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] python@programming.dev 100 points 1 month ago (13 children)

Was he actually Italian though? As in, speaking Italian, having an Italian passport etc.? Y'all Americans have weird definitions of nationality, just having a foreign sounding last name isn't really enough...

[–] Enoblk@lemmy.world 79 points 1 month ago (1 children)

When someone from America says they Italian or whatever they aren't talking about nationality, it's about ancestry, where your family came from not what county you were born in

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 73 points 1 month ago (2 children)

No no no no........it's about what kind of food your mom cooked when you were a kid.

Which makes me.......uhhhhhh........clown? I don't know. She bought a lot of McDonalds.

[–] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 33 points 1 month ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 32 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Dude's name is Luigi and his last name sounds like a pizza restaurant. That settles it for me, thank you very much.

[–] python@programming.dev 20 points 1 month ago (10 children)

You joke, but that kind of prejudice is pretty hurtful in day to day life

[–] shadearg@lemmy.world 38 points 1 month ago (6 children)

It's important to remember that the Italians and the Irish were treated as a low rung of American society not all that long ago.

They are legitimate victims of the brunt of American hate.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Is it though? You would be hurt if someone thought you were Italian? You must think pretty poorly of them lol

In America since we came here and took the land from the natives we just assume everyone's family came from somewhere else at some point in recent history. A lot of families are very proud of their ancestry and talk about it a lot.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

According to Italian law if you have Italian ancestry, you're Italian. There's a whole process (with many asterisks and exceptions) in which you can apply to get your Italian passport

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] DankOfAmerica@reddthat.com 80 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] TwoBeeSan@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago

"I learned it from watching you, ok?!?!?"

[–] CriticalMiss@lemmy.world 77 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Let’s hope the jury disagrees

[–] AFaithfulNihilist@lemmy.world 45 points 1 month ago (2 children)

They charged him with terrorism so a regular jury won't get to make that decision. It will be a federal grand jury of selected stooges, and maybe even a secret court.

[–] EpeeGnome@lemm.ee 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)

A federal grand jury isn't a replacement for a regular federal trial jury. They're completely different things. A grand jury decides if there is a strong enough case to take the charges to trial, or if they should just be dismissed. When a grand jury isn't used, the trial judge makes that determination themselves. I agree that the terrorism charge will affect how the trial is conducted, but I don't know enough on that topic to comment further.

[–] AFaithfulNihilist@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

That's true but the way that a federal jury works is very different.

It allows them to choose people from outside of the area in which the crime occurred.

Making it a federal trial jury instead of a state trial jury allows them to charge this single murder against an individual perpetrated by another individual who made no public statement with a much more severe crime than the state laws that he broke would normally allow.

It's also important to note that making it a federal trial makes it less public as there will be no cameras allowed. They don't want him tried in the state of New York because that could legally be televised which is a bad look when you've already got judicial homicide lined up and the trial is purely performative.

Being that they can choose people from all over and that the process of jury selection is even more opaque at the federal level they can make sure there won't be any nullification issues.

The way they are treating Luigi whether or not he's guilty indicates that it's not relevant whether or not he's guilty. They legitimately don't care, this is about sending a message that the poors don't get to fight back.

[–] Faresh@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Oh. So that was their play.

[–] DeadWorldWalking@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Nothing will meaningfully improve until the rich fear for their lives

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] secret300@lemmy.sdf.org 74 points 1 month ago (11 children)

Uhuh... And the school shooters? No terrorist charges?...

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works 51 points 1 month ago (10 children)

the definition of terrorism from the FBI is very... vague

Here's an exerpt from the declaration of Independence :3

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 45 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

”We are all domestic terrorists…”

-CPAC (Republicans) 2022

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 41 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

CEO's: Second degree murder is the highest you can charge him with for killing a CEO in NY? But we want to torture him and make an example of him so the proles don't get uppity!

DA: No problem sirs, we can make that happen.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PiratePanPan@lemmy.dbzer0.com 40 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

See, his mistake was not killing him during a Career Day at an elementary school. If he took out kids as well, he wouldn't get a terrorism charge.

[–] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 23 points 4 weeks ago

Dark humor is like food, not everyone gets it.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 34 points 1 month ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] bokherif@lemmy.world 33 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't feel terrorized. Wonder who does

[–] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 22 points 4 weeks ago

Ruthless CEOs and other greedy, rich scumbags, of course.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 25 points 1 month ago (18 children)

From what the manifesto found on him allegedly said, it sounds like his actions were politically motivated. And violence in pursuit of a political goal is kinda the definition of terrorism.

[–] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 57 points 1 month ago (8 children)

George Washington used violence to advance his political agenda of a sovereign USA. Was George a terrorist?

[–] SomethingBurger@jlai.lu 35 points 1 month ago (3 children)

It's not terrorism if you win.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Yes, why would you think he wasn’t?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[–] Donkter@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Is there any chance that the terrorism charge is so ridiculous that it actually strengthens Luigi's case and makes his defense better?

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago

Yes because it specifically allows examining his motive from a political angle which allows the defense to question the character of the guy he shot, which increases the chance of nullification.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Allonzee@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] OccamsRazer@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's more of an assassination in my opinion.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›