this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

News

25534 readers
3615 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world -1 points 7 months ago (4 children)

Any moment now, the 'don't vote for Biden' group will be in here telling us not to vote for Harris. And if it isn't Harris, they'll tell us not to vote for whoever it is.

Anything but stop the dictator and his plan to commit genocide against Latinos and queer people.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Even if Trump wasn't going to do awful things, I can't stand his stupid face or his stupid voice or his stupid stupidity. That's enough to vote for someone who'll beat him.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago (2 children)

No. It absolutely isn't. I was too young to vote in the 2000 election, but Gore had the same stupid face, long drawn out speech paterns, and general unlikability.

However, his policies, and his message were good. I would have voted for him despite his stupid face, because of him being the better candidate.

I FULLY understand people hating trump......but I underatand the hate because trump is a piece of shit. I get why trump is hated for his bad policies. I get why people hate having a criminal in the white house.

But to say that if a candidate were good for the position, but you hate their face and voice, I wouldn't understand that.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Nah, Gore is not nearly as stupid as Trump, either in face, voice, or thought.

[–] aStonedSanta@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Yeah but Gore did win that election. It was stolen from him. Just like Bernie won the DNC nomination and it was stolen from him. Fuck the DNC. But fuck the RNC harder.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

This is the kind of comment that makes me angry, while I agree with all of it. It's a weird feeling to be yelling "YEAH I AGREE WITH THAT!!! RAAAAHHH!!!!!"

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Yeah but Gore did win that election. It was stolen from him.

It was stolen from us.

[–] queue@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

I may be a weirdo, but I was on the "I'd consider not voting for Biden." but I'm currently more interested in Harris. Nowhere near as bad of a track record as Biden had. From being racist, to supporting rapists getting into the Supreme Court, to backing massive removal of constitutional rights.

Harris' record isn't perfect, and while I'm in California, I don't recall any bills she pushed/voted for as Senator that was anything as bad as the USA PATRIOT Act. I don't like her record as our AG at all, but Senator is a different story.

If she picks a good VP pick, I'd be down. I'm wanting maybe Newsom, but that's just he biggest Democrat I know, as he's my Governor.

Edit: I don't know how to make it clear: I live in California. If I voted for a ham sandwich for oresident it would have the same impact as voting for Biden. My state's EC is clear and chosen, and popular vote doesn't decide the president otherwise we'd never have Trump. I was considering going Greens, but I'm looking forward to Harris. Get mad at undecideds in Swing States and Trump supporters, not a registered Democrat in California.

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

you were considering not voting for Biden when Trump was the alternative?

[–] kylie_kraft@lemmy.world -1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

A very common position among the lemmy crowd, unfortunately. I really don't expect much to change either, just swap Harris for Biden in the hit pieces.

[–] queue@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I don't know how to make it clear: I live in California. If I voted for a ham sandwich for president it would have the same impact as voting for Biden. My state's EC is clear and chosen, and popular vote doesn't decide the president otherwise we'd never have Trump. I was considering going Greens, but I'm looking forward to Harris. Get mad at undecideds in Swing States and Trump supporters, not a registered Democrat in California.

[–] Djtecha@lemm.ee 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

CA still has republicans in congress so please still vote.

[–] queue@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I'm trying to. I live in the district Kevin McCarthy was in. His replacement isn't great. Our blanket primary was "Republican backed by Kevin and Trump" and "Republican backed by conservative think tanks and Trump staff".

I've considered running for office using a form of leftist talks masked like Republican talking points. But an openly queer leftist in Republican territory won't go well, unless I figure out what urn I want ahead of time.

[–] Djtecha@lemm.ee 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] queue@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 7 months ago

Even if we lose in 2024, we keep fighting.

[–] ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 7 months ago (4 children)

I didn't want to believe it but they're already in the comments. We need to be vocal. Kamala is a great candidate.

[–] Speculater@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (4 children)

How is she a good candidate? She stood against everything progressives stand for as a prosecutor and hasn't apologized or clarified that she supports marijuana legalization, abolition of for-profit prisons, or disproportionately prosecuting minorities.

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago

Are you new to the democratic party?

[–] samokosik@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Let me ask you a question: Harris Or Trump?

[–] Speculater@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Harris, 100% I was wrong about the statement. She evolved her stance and has grown.

[–] ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 7 months ago

https://www.politifact.com/article/2019/aug/01/were-tulsi-gabbards-attacks-kamala-harris-record-c/

Harris "put over 1,500 people in jail for marijuana violations and then laughed about it when she was asked if she ever smoked marijuana."

Notably, the figures dropped dramatically during Harris’ tenure, from 817 marijuana-related admissions in her first year in office to 137 in her last.

She laughed because it was funny and I'm tired of people telling me it's not. 💥 🔫

She's been a prosecutor, senator, and now VP. She has the experience. She can speak in complete sentences. She is a neo-liberal but that was a given. All Democratic candidates since Clinton have been neo-liberals. The idea that Kamala is anti-progressive is false.

[–] elbucho@lemmy.world -1 points 7 months ago (2 children)

What the fuck are you talking about? When she was running for president in 2019, she released detailed plans about how she would legalize marijuana, abolish private prisons, and reform the carceral system.

I get that you probably weren't aware of her evolved stance on these things, but a single google search could have shown you that you were incorrect on every single point you made.

[–] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 months ago

What the fuck are you talking about? When she was running for president in 2019, she released detailed plans about how she would legalize marijuana, abolish private prisons, and reform the carceral system.

Has she done those things? (I sincerely don't know.)

I've heard that she's revised her stances, but even in 2019 there was some question regarding the sincerity of her evolving viewpoints.

We're likely to get 8 years of her if she wins, so I think it's entirely reasonable to want her to affirm her stances in some of these areas. We won't be able to move any further left than she allows. Sure, she's not Trump, and I'm going to vote for her. It would be nice to have hope she'll do more than just move right more slowly than Trump though.

She says very little, and nothing convincing, about some of the most serious charges against her, like that she fought hard to keep innocents in prison and failed to fight hard against corrupt cops.

If elected president, Harris seems as likely as any of her Democratic rivals, and far more likely than Donald Trump, to pursue a criminal-justice-reform agenda that overlaps with policies I favor as a civil libertarian. And I do not hold it against Harris that as a municipal and state official she enforced many laws that I regard as unjust. All the candidates now running for president will, if elected, preside over the enforcement of some laws that they and I regard as unjust.

But like her rivals, the reforms that Harris would sign into law as president would depend mostly on what Democrats in Congress could get to her desk. Far more important is how she would preside over a federal legal system and bureaucracy that is prone to frequent abuses. And her record casts significant doubts about whether she can be trusted to oversee federal law enforcement, the military, intelligence agencies, the detention of foreign prisoners, and more.

[–] Speculater@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

And I'm happy to be wrong about her evolved state. Thanks.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (4 children)

If she she's was a great candidate she would have been the candidate 4 years ago.

[–] rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

If you’d applied this logic to trump would have even posted this?

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Wha... what? What does that even mean?

[–] rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The republicans are running last election’s loser.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

She's an adequate candidate for the task at hand, which is beating Trump. Biden no longer is.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

That's far from a assured. She has a ton of issues on her own.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

She's an improvement over Biden. And just look at all the time, money, and effort Republicans wasted against someone who's no longer even running. They're flailing and trying to find something that will stick.

[–] ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

She was on the ticket 4 years ago. She is VP. Now she's on top. Kamala 2024!

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I'm concerned you couldn't grasp that by candidate we were talking about the Presidential candidate.

[–] ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 7 months ago

I understand. Kamala is going to president of the United States of America. And it's going to be awesome.

[–] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network -1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Dear god, please tell me this isn’t the best you people can come up with.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Funny that's what I say when I hear Harris is gonna be the candidate.

Of course they are. It's infuriating. Even the "anyone but trump" idiots undermines confidence in Kamala.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world -1 points 7 months ago

Of course they are. They started when it was just rumored that Biden would drop out.