Makes sense. He already had USDA Inspector General Phyllis Fong escorted out after she refused to quit. She just happened to be leading an investigation into Musk's company Neuralink. I'm sure that was just a coincidence, though.
this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2025
454 points (98.1% liked)
News
24403 readers
4364 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
This all makes sense now.
Well, it always made sense insofar as we always knew these fucks were about their own self gain. Now we know one of the specific gains they are gutting society to get. I'm sure there'll be more.
isn't this troglodyte the richest creature in the world? can he not pay anyone to give him a decent haircut?
There ya go. Of course Elon Musk, king of the US, was under investigation. That explains a lot.
Unfortunately we will never know the full story.
There it is
There it is
As recently pointed out, you imagine what Republicans would be doing if George Soros was in Musk's shoes?
We'd already be in civil war. Literally.
We'd already be in civil war. Literally.
We already are.
And we are getting our asses handed to us.
As of yet, a Cold Civil War
I learned a long time ago that republicans not only are hypocrites, but they are 100% aware of this.
Blatant hypocrisy, in their eyes, is merely an expression of power. They get to do it and you don't.
And don’t care.
Especially they don’t care. It’s frustrating.
George Soros would be dead.
To be fair I don’t know how the man is still alive. The dude is basically a fossil.
musk is a piece of shit but why is this investigation in USAID's purview?
Likely wanted to get/keep a contract for providing communication services when cell towers may be down. I think the specific issue that brought USAID's eye was when he disabled the satellites during a critical event.
Yup and probably cost lives by preventing aid from getting to where it needed to go. USAID signed a contract with starlink, Musk didn't keep his side off the bargain. Thus, investigation.
Despite the headline USAID wasn't investigating Musk or Starlink. It was investigating how Ukraine was using the Starlink terminals that USAID gave them and how USAID itself was overseeing Ukraine's use.
Basically the headline is completely misrepresenting what was happening.
There it is.
Ah, so, basically, whatever he was doing was illegal.
Perhaps I'm confused but it doesn't appear that the headline is supported by the article. This "investigation" was started and publicly announced in May of 2024 and it has nothing to do with Starlink's contracts in Ukraine. Rather it's about how Ukraine was using the StarLink terminals that USAID was giving them and how USAID was monitoring their use.
unless someone has more info, this seems very thin at the moment. speculating, with nothing more than a usaid website blurb, does not seem helpful beyond distraction. follow the trickle and uncover hard evidence, sure... but this? right now?
It's helpful if you have an agenda.
muppets lmao