this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2025
542 points (93.7% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

27409 readers
3603 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gazter@aussie.zone 7 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Transcription for screen readers:

The meme is making a broad generalisation about a large group of people all heading the same undesirable trait, that trait being making broad generalisations of large groups of people having undesirable traits.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 3 hours ago

Adding to the transcription because watering down the point does no service to anyone who can't actually read it, it says:

People born in the 50's have lived in 7 decades, 2 centuries & 2 millenniums. We had the best music, fastest cars, Drive-in theaters, soda fountains & happy days. And we are not even that old yet, we're just racist

And yes, huge swaths of them are racist. There are also racists in their 20s (Nick Fuentes), but they are far more common in older generations, the south, rural areas, etc. These are facts.

[–] Hikermick@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Replacing hate with another hate. Just goes to show you, haters gonna hate

[–] jdeath@lemm.ee 1 points 25 minutes ago

and lovers gonna love

i just want

none of the above

[–] Good_morning@lemmynsfw.com 44 points 1 day ago (2 children)

"not even that old yet" ? I think most would consider 70ish old, unless you're running for president

[–] tatterdemalion@programming.dev 10 points 22 hours ago

I also consider "about to die on average" to be "old".

[–] GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'm voting for Jimmy Carter in 28' and we'll just pull weekend at Bernie's.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A corpse would make a better leader than the guy starting up Monday.

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

With any luck that will be arranged.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sevon@lemmy.kde.social 43 points 1 day ago (6 children)
[–] psud@aussie.zone 11 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

They think '50s hotrods were faster than later cars because later cars were "detuned to meet environmental rules"

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

They are still buttmad that Jimmy Carter asked them to not use up gasoline like toilet paper after a day of chipotle and Taco Bell. Its oppositional defiant disorder as politics. Remember how absolutely pissed people were about seat belt laws?

[–] psud@aussie.zone 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Sadly or luckily I missed the seatbelt controversy by not being born until after it was all settled

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

I grew up in the kind of place where conservative fundamentalists still identified as Democrats into the 90s - Dixiecrats were alive and well. Heard rants from relatives about the monstrous government overreach into the ‘10s as they’d refuse to put their seat belts on.

[–] hesusingthespiritbomb@lemmy.world 6 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

To be fair that 1950s boomer is putting that pedal to the floor, seatbelts off, zero concern for anyone's lives including their own.

[–] dditty@lemm.ee 1 points 7 minutes ago

Seat belts weren't even mandatory until 1984

[–] Laser@feddit.org 20 points 1 day ago

It never states that they had these in their birth years. Just that they had them. Might have been in the 2020s with the Koenigsegg Jesko Absolut, which is the fastest car and was built in their lifetime. And coincidentally, currently the fastest in my lifetime as well

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 114 points 1 day ago (3 children)

People born in the 1950s grew up with a 91% top-tier income tax rate, which ultra-rich people went out of their way to avoid by spending their excess income on "business expenses", rather than investments.

[–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 48 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 44 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Absolutely.

It used to be that if you had $10,000 excess income, you could use it to buy $900 worth of stock, bonds, and other financial instruments or you could spend the entirety of that $10,000 on something you tell the IRS you plan to use for business purposes, and pay some salaries for making it.

Now, if you are $10,000 over the line, you can turn $6,300 into stocks, and double your money in 4-5 years. There's no point in actually spending your money anymore; just keep rolling the excess into the means of making more.

[–] DannyBoy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

Unless this person happened to be born outside of the USA.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (3 children)

And instead of saving their money they spent it, and the people who got their money spent it, and so on until I got pennies in my ass that are going to Jeff Bezos

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 31 points 1 day ago (4 children)

1999ers have a decent chance of living in 3 centuries. Much more impressive

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

A guy I once knew had a great grandmom born in 1898 who accomplished just that! She must have had some killer stories!

[–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

She must have had some killer stories!

The world wars did kill a lot of people.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] sirico@feddit.uk 24 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That's a lot of 50s nostalgia for a decade you spend mostly shitting yourself and barely able to put together a sentence. Reminds me of my grandparents talking about living through the blitz being born in 1945.

[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The meme isn't talking about the 50s but about the youth of people orn in the 50s, so +-70s

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] butter@midwest.social 11 points 1 day ago (15 children)

Drive in theaters, soda fountains, and happy days still exist.

But they've mostly been improved upon

[–] itsonlygeorge@reddthat.com 4 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Cars in the 60’s had bench seats that were pretty much couches. Hard to beat that.

[–] gazter@aussie.zone 1 points 5 hours ago

Bench seats were much closer to benches than couches.

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Cars are also waaaaay faster today than they ever were in boomer days. You could smoke just about all their 1960s and 1970s muscle cars in a fucking current day Prius lol, never mind something that's actually engineered to go fast.

[–] 0ops@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I have lots of issues with modern cars. Horsepower is not one of them. Idk if you can right now, but pretty recently you could spec a 300hp minivan from most major automakers.

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

My biggest gripes are garbage/dangerous interfaces (use PHYSICAL CONTROLS, fuck touchscreens!), monthly/extra fees for features that should be included with the cost of the car, and invasive tracking.

Oh, and manual transmission is becoming harder and harder to find.

[–] 0ops@lemm.ee 3 points 23 hours ago
[–] Strocker89@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I mean, probably not with a Prius, at least the first several generations of them. But definitely with something like a WRX or a Civic type r. And those aren't even expensive cars. Modern electric cars definitely blow them out of the water. The electric mustang would absolutely crush any mustang from the 60s and 70s

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io 5 points 1 day ago

IDK, Prius has 0-60 in 7 seconds on the base model at least for the newer stuff. The Prime is closer to 6 apparently.

My point was mostly that even a car that is widely regarded as slow by modern standards would have been considered very fast back then.

Even if you discount electric motors with the acceleration benefits they provide, there's still a shitload of modern cars that are way faster and handle way better than anything they ever made.

[–] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Something about this felt wrong but I looked it up, and…. Nope. You’re absolutely correct! Damn. I had thought the classics were much faster than that, but a 1964 mustang only topped out at around 100mph.

[–] TwentySeven@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You picked a car with a small engine (for its time anyway). I don't think a 64.5 mustang was ever considered a fast car.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Just say it, you don't like racism

i heard it’s racist to not like racism

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›