So, what course of action are you proposing? Vote Trump? Vote 3rd party? Don't vote?
What's your intended / expected outcome?
this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)
Memes
45724 readers
138 users here now
Rules:
- Be civil and nice.
- Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Voting 3rd party is a great idea. One that doesn't support Genocide that is.
A normally blue voter voting 3rd party is indirectly helping Trump win the election. Do you think Trump's Israel policy is going to be better than Harris's?
Trump will be the same on israel. Are you going to reward the Democrats for 10 months of Genocide?
Well, I'm not a single-issue voter.
I'm not rewarding them for anything, but I accept that it's possible to oppose one policy a politician has, even a very important one, and at the same time support a lot of other policies they have, while also vehemently opposing almost all policies that their opponent supports, and make my choice based on that information.
Based on this post, you seem to be a single-issue voter, though, so I'm trying to understand what you're hoping the outcome is. You acknowledge that a vote that supports Trump, even indirectly, is not helping the people of Gaza, so why would you vote against your own self-interests? What's your goal?
If your goal is to show opposition to what's happening in Gaza, there's much more effective ways to do that. Get out there and protest - the protests at the DNC are getting a lot of news coverage, that's where your activism could actually make a difference. Not here.
The guys is just a trump/maga shill who exploits the suffering in Gaza to attack the democratic party. That's all he every posts about. Don't waste your time.
I don't think it's a waste of time. Even if I can't convince him specifically, there are other people reading these posts. If someone came to this thread who was less sure, and I can change their mind, that's good enough for me.
Would you be a single-issue voter if you were the victim of Genocide?
The outcome is the Democrats stop committing Genocide or they don't get votes. "But Trump" isn't even an argument.
If I were the victim of genocide, I wouldn't be a voter at all, because I'd be dead. However, that's kind of irrelevant - are you the victim of genocide? I'm assuming not, if you're voting in the US election. Even if you're Palestinian, your people are the victim of genocide, but unless you're in Palestine, you aren't.
That said, if you are Palestinian, I feel for you, I honestly do, and it would explain your view somewhat.
I think we can both agree that there's only two outcomes that're possible in this election: Trump wins, or Harris wins. (If you don't agree, I'd be happy to hear your third outcome.) If you truly believe there's no difference between the two of them, you need to do some research on the topic, because there are a lot of differences, even if they don't pertain to this issue specifically.
If, between the two of them, you hope Harris wins, a 3rd party vote is voting against your interests. If you hope Trump wins between the two of them, a 3rd party vote is still voting against your interests, because you're effectively taking a vote away from your preferred candidate among the two who could possibly win.
Edit to respond to your edit:
The outcome is the Democrats stop committing Genocide or they don’t get votes. “But Trump” isn’t even an argument.
Unless you're out there protesting, or writing letters, or making phone calls, or in some way letting them know that their policy is costing them your vote, it's a useless gesture. Posting on Lemmy isn't going to change any politician's minds. It's not even going to change anyone's mind here, in all likelihood. If you actually want to make a difference, you need to make your voice heard by the people whose minds you're actually trying to change.
Not every victim of Genocide is killed. Any person who was put in a concentration camp by Hitler, or even persecuted, was a victim of the Holocaust. Similarly any person in Gaza is the victim of a Genocide. And you don't have to be a Palestinian to empathise with people.
Your scope of analysis is limited to 4 years. There's no long term analysis. If people vote for Genocide it will cement that Democrats can get away with anything if they fearmonger hard enough.
When people threaten to withhold votes for a Genocide they have to follow through or all the leverage falls away. It's a game of chicken now.
OK, I'll bite. Trump wins. Give your "long term analysis"
Democrats won't do Genocide in 2028 if they win then because they have now learnt they can't get away with literally anything by feamongering.
Democrats can't just say they're "not Trump". They have to be "not Trump".
You honestly think losing one election will teach anybody anything? How the fuck will they know what lesson to learn when they lose? As other commenters have said, their are other issues the two parties disagree on. How will they know what one to blame for losing?
On the other hand, pubs are learning that they can run a convicted felon that promises a dictatorship if he wins. Yeah, let's set that precedent...
Already proven. They dropped Biden because they knew they would get Hillary2016'd if they didn't. Democrats only seem to learn their lesson the hard way.
Heard the dictator shtick in 2016 try something new.
load more comments
(2 replies)
It's a game of chicken now.
And if you're not scared of a convicted felon who promises to be a dictator on day one and has the Supreme Court in his pocket who granted him immunity as well as a cult like following who stormed the Capitol to attempt an insurrection yet who also praises dictators and salutes their generals and has nothing to lose getting ahold of the Presidency then I don't know what to tell ya. But sure, let's play chicken with the saner and lesser of the two evils and help MAGA win.
We've heard this one in 2016. The duopoly will not allow the facade to end. There will be elections in 2028.
We've heard this one in 2016.
He was a convicted felon who had the Supreme Court in his pocket who granted him immunity as well as an attempted insurrection in his honor and he saluted hostile generals?
I don't remember if he promised to be a dictator on day one or had already praised dictators back then, so I'll grant you that one out of...everything else he's done since then which was not covered in 2016.
Trump was not just going to install a Fascist regime but commit a Genocide on all Mexicans and Arabs and start nuclear WW3. In the end he built a worthless border wall and a did Muslim ban that got overturned rather quickly.
Collective amnesia amongst Democrats appears to have wiped all the memories of previous Trump fearmongering away. There's room for fresh new fearmongering again.
I don't care about Trumps felony convictions of him bribing a porn star. Biden and Harris should face trial in the Hague for literal Genocide.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Your scope of analysis is limited to 4 years. There's no long term analysis.
The long term analysis is that both Israel and Palestine have been more interested in conflict than peace for far longer than I have been alive.
The reality is that their little quarrel is pretty low on my list of priorities. I want representatives who share that opinion.
Both Sidesing a Genocide by lying about history, another brave approach.
load more comments
(3 replies)
The laws of thermodynamics are sometimes summarized as
- You can't win
- You can't break even
- You can't quit
That summary applies to the Israel/Palestine conflict. Everyone is going to be pissed off no matter what we do, including if we do nothing.
Politically, the best way to deal with Israel/Palestine is "Hey, look, a squirrel".
Doing mental gymnastics to ignore a Genocide is very convenient.
Are you going to reward Trump for his decade of insane douchebaggery and criminal behavior? Why would we do that?
Never did I say vote for Trump you're just putting words in my mouth now. But you're saying you consider Trumps record of being a scamming piece of trash worse than literal Genocide?
You don’t seem to have read or followed any of the logic here. Why’s that?
Someone who would otherwise vote for Harris voting 3rd party would help Trump win. Pretty simple. Not sure what’s so hard to understand about that. And Trump would be just as bad on Gaza, worst likely, and worse on every other issue facing the country as well. Not sure how many times we have to say it.
No voting third party helps third party win.
Voting for Harris is helping Genocide win.
load more comments
(5 replies)
load more comments
(4 replies)
That's complete nonsense. Trump is going to support Netanjahu going full fascist. The Democrats are going to offer at least some resistance. Not nearly enough obviously, but there is a clear difference nonetheless. A second Trump administration would be extremely damaging not just to the US but to the entire world. But that's fine by you, isn't it? People like you just want to see the world burn and all your ideas of how something better is somehow going to rise from the ashes are just bullshit.
You can't defend a Genocide by pretending the Demcrats haven't already gone full Fascist. All of Netanyahu's commands have been obeyed to perfection.
Ah, "The Jews" are controlling the American government. Yeah, sure.
I know liberals are supporting a Holocaust but cool it with the antisemitism
No. In his previous term he clearly favoured Israel more than what the current government is. Examples I remember are moving the embassy to contested/Palestinian territory, having his corrupt step son manage policy in the middle east and wasn’t Kushner and the kids involved in shady business dealings in the area as well.
Stopping the genocide is very important, but it’s also very important to stop the facist from taking power. EVERYTHING, including Israeli mistreatment of Palestinians will be a whole lot worse with the facist in power.
Trump will kiss up to Netanyahu because they are both demagogues.
load more comments
(2 replies)
There are four options for American voters: vote red, vote blue, vote third party, or don't vote at all.
Voting red is just bad. I highly doubt that the Gaza situation would get any better if Trump gets in, but I know for a fact that a lot of things will get much worse.
Voting third party is a wasted effort. Sure, every sane person would prefer different people to run America, but the the shit fptp system means they'll never get any traction. In another election voting third party could be worth it, since a third party might slowly get more support, but not this one.
Not voting is just pointless. That's just choosing to not impact anything.
That only leaves voting blue. It's not great, but it's the only option left.
This all hangs on the false assumption in the third statement.
This astute logic brought to you by a person that thinks insulting the people they need the support of is a good idea.
Soll explain to us how voting for any third party would change anything for the better.
They don't support Genocide.
Explain how voting for Democrat would change anything for the better instead.
So preserving your imaginary moral superiority is your only goal. Right. Gotcha.
Say you don't know how the US electoral college works without saying you don't know how the US electoral college works.
It’s weird how we can try to explain this to people for months straight and they’re still posting stupid memes about it.
Because they have a LOT of money riding on convincing people not to vote blue. Gee, I wonder who benefits from that most.
load more comments
(2 replies)
It’s weird how you call your country a democracy but are forced to make choices you’re not at all comfortable with.
Umm, I don't. We're a Republic, always have been.
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
I highly doubt that the Gaza situation would get any better if Trump gets in, but I know for a fact that a lot of things will get much worse.
What would Trump do that the Dems are not already doing? Trump would be a genocidal monster, yes, but we have DNC goers literally mocking Pro-Palestinian protestors and covering their ears:
There are four options for American voters: vote red, vote blue, vote third party, or don't vote at all.
Nope, there are an infinite number of options. If a math question is "what number is greater than 10?" And the Dems said 4 and the Reps said 2, that doesn't mean the Dems are correct. Voting will not save us, so we must move outside the realm of electoralism. Join an org, build up dual power, replace the DNC and GOP by force.
load more comments
(3 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
This is a false choice fallacy done in bad faith. Nobody is voting in favour of the genocide by voting for the democrats.
Do you disagree with the idea that the "lesser evil" has been getting steadily more evil?
load more comments
(2 replies)
Yeah, time to filter lemmy.ml. ah well
load more comments
(40 replies)
Wanting people to not vote for the only option that can beat Trump?
Wonder who that benefits… 🤔🤔🤔
load more comments
(6 replies)
view more: next ›