We have fibre in Cambodia, but... It's mainly sub 100Mbps for affordable lines. 1Gb worldwide would be great first!
Technology
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
I'm shocked that Google Fiber hasn't yet been added to the list of services they've shut down because they got bored of them.
Maybe that's still to come.
I thought most of the google fiber rollouts where constantly stuck in legal battles with the telecoms. I know here in my state, att basically blocked it constantly by claiming they didn't have the resources to move their wires to another spot on the public poles.
Getting customers to have a faster internet connection should mean that they visit more sites/do more searches which should mean more ad impressions, which should mean more pathways to revenue generation for Google. Customers not having access to fast internet is an impudence to Google's future revenue generation.
Well, you have to see, but Google Fiber is a division of Alphabet. Although the closest thing to that was in 2016 when it halted its expansion plans.
You can connect a lot of data about someone, and then send them a lot of ads at 50Gbps.
Can we work on expanding existing fiber so most places get at least a single gig fiber first?
I have a feeling the people making fiber internet faster aren't the same people installing it in neighborhoods.
Google also isn't the people making fiber faster. It's scientists in labs
https://www.popsci.com/technology/fiber-optic-wavelength-record/
So you are proving their point, not to be a dick, but theyre the ones financing both so I agree with who you responded to that they shiuld allocate their investments into expanding their customer base before improving it for the existing customer base.
Last I recall, Google was trying (they obviously want the money) but was receiving pushback from legacy ISPs and the local governments they have agreements with. Is that not the case?
We don't have to make everything perfect everywhere before we make improvements to something.
We have more than enough resources to increase availability, and to improve existing connections.
Google basically gave up because even with their bankroll, dealing with the regulatory bullshit monopolies current providers had a lot of places was prohibitive.
This wouldn’t be for a single customer. It’s 50 gig PON, which would serve 32-64 different customers. I’m not an engineer, but I’m assuming it will pave the way for 2.5-5 Gbps services.
Most companies are currently switching from GPON (2.5 gig shared 32 ways), to XGSPON (10 Gbps split between 32-64 customers).
The company I work for has been deploying XGSPON on Nokia transport for a few years now. It’s very nice.
Edit: I wasn’t real specific on how it’s split. So that 50 Gbps feed is sent down a single fiber to a splitter, which is often in the field in an AP cabinet. From there fiber that actually goes to the customer’s premise gets connected. It feels a little dirty splitting like some sort of old coax system, but it makes rolling out fiber to the home much, much quicker.
Much bandwidth for a DDoS <3
Meanwhile the fiber rollout isn't going well here because the bottom price sub-subcontractors f-ed up driveways and sidewalks so much they're no longer allowed to install fiber in places.
How long before pop ups are back and commercials are sent to anything you are doing online.
Crying in german. Multiple friends of mine who live in city centers of huge cities still have 16Mbit connections.
Man... I wish. My area still doesn't even have symmetric gigabit speeds. I'm on a 300mbps package currently with uploads peaking at ~25mbps.
The old cable companies are clinging to their coax! Let DOCSIS die!
This is the first step towards Google owning your very thoughts.
It’s about time for this. I’ve developed my home system capable of 100G. WAN connection is the final piece.
What kind of firewall do you have that can handle that amount of bandwidth?
I am surprised that this is a major event, I would have thought this would be a relatively simple progression of the tech.