Technology

59672 readers

2908 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Google Begins Testing 50 Gig Fiber Internet (www.howtogeek.com)

submitted 4 months ago by MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip to c/technology@lemmy.world

25 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Researchers from Nokia and GFiber Labs (the experimental arm of Google Fiber) successfully achieved 41.89 Gbps download speeds on a live Google Fiber network. This marks the first time that Nokia's 50G PON (passive optical network) technology has been used on a Google-owned network, and its one of the only examples of live 50 Gig networking in the United States.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] gaylord_fartmaster@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I have a feeling the people making fiber internet faster aren't the same people installing it in neighborhoods.

[–] Zwiebel@feddit.org 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Google also isn't the people making fiber faster. It's scientists in labs

https://www.popsci.com/technology/fiber-optic-wavelength-record/

[–] 11111one11111@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

So you are proving their point, not to be a dick, but theyre the ones financing both so I agree with who you responded to that they shiuld allocate their investments into expanding their customer base before improving it for the existing customer base.

[–] thrawn@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

Last I recall, Google was trying (they obviously want the money) but was receiving pushback from legacy ISPs and the local governments they have agreements with. Is that not the case?