While I can see lots of things like drunk windows and droopy rooflines, this really doesn't strike me as obviously AI. Have you ever been to a mountain town of former coal glory? PA/WV has many towns like that. 150-year old buildings fighting frost heaves, people tacking on decks just to bring a little joy, signs that look 50 year sout of place. Sucks that AI has so much overlap with a poor town of 200 people.
XeroxCool
joined 1 year ago
The pizza boy union filed too many reports about closed roads and having to find another way home
For about 5 years, I ignored theaters and said the same things as you. Now I'm back to going a few times a year. You don't have to buy the popcorn - I never have it at home, so why do I need it there? You don't take a date to a movie to talk during the movie, you go to share entertainment and have something easy to talk about from a shared experience later. There are many new movies, they just don't get the hype compared to movies with existing universes. It's not necessarily a bad thing to reuse existing IP, either, because it can help skip the initial exposition and put more action and development in the screen time. Obviously, there are plenty of examples of poor writing and weak attempts to keep some IP rolling.
What brings me to the theater (usually on a Tuesday with a discount) is the immersion. It helps me really get into the characters' experiences. It's not required because I certainly get into plenty of movies using my phone on planes (work travel), but it's something I choose to utilize. I'll also try to see movies where I expect dramatic cinematography. Movies like 1917, Dunkirk, and La La Land come to mind for originals while I'd include Bladerunner 2049, Dune 1+2, and Mad Max Fury/Furiosa in the reboot list. Anything Wes Anderson, too, if that's your flavor. I'm indifferent about superhero movies because the CGI is so overwhelming that it's indistinguishable from a video game to me, so it loses value. I understand your aversion to reboots, but I'd say one I missed and absolutely wish I had seen in theaters is Tron: Legacy because that has become one of my all-time favorite movies. It's nothing groundbreaking, but it's a beautiful crossroads of my visual and audio interests at the time with the score by Daft Punk. It's as if it's a sequel to Interstellar 5555, their album anime movie.
Pixar has some bangers, too. I realized at some point I was ignoring them because they seemed too hard to get into, when in reality I just wasn't trying. I thought I was too old, ignoring that I obviously already knew about the deeper themes in my childhood Pixar films. They're pretty original. Inside Out 1 was an emotional trainwreck and Coco and Soul were enjoyable as well.
I'm not trying to say you're wrong. It's your opinion. I'm just seeing what I used to think and want to offer some insight on where I am now. It's easy to miss the original titles because there's so much rehash out there. There's always another formulaic Marvel movie and a shoddy DC film coming up. We're flodded with content, so it's harder to get attached to a particular movie. I saw a meme or tweet that said something like "what ever happened to having families develop entire cult followings of some mediocre film because they only owned 15 VHS films?" and it stuck with me. Marvel is flooding theaters with mediocre superheros, Netflix is flooding streaming with mediocre everything, and Disney is flooding their platform with 80s-90s rehash. I get it. I was rolling my eyes when I heard Alien: Romulus was coming because I thought "yet another Alien?" and, when complaining, I looked up the list and found there's way less Alien movies than I thought. But the gems are still out there, even if you never visit a theater again. I keep a list of loose recommendations, torrent them, and will randomly press play on one and let it rip.
Reasonable reason: pre-2020 theaters would be packed sometimes and it's helpful to have assigned seats. It resolves seating disputes and gets people to go straight to their seats. When I saw Avengers End Game (or maybe Infinity War), they had to have employees spotting empty seats for everyone walking in.
Cynical theory: they're logging seat selection trends and going to move to tiered pricing like airplane seats
It doesn't say the screenshot must be full resolution and it doesn't say the screenshot is immediately uploaded. A couple seconds to downscale and compress would work the same as far as content identification is concerned
And now we know you don't care
The weight-per-unit-area of a shingle is dwarfed by the amount of snow it takes to affect a roof.
These shingles weight 1.8lbs per square foot when installed (3 packs for 99.9sqft at 62lbs per pack). Call it 2lbs/sqft with nails. Ice (the densest form of "snow" weighs 57lbs per cubic foot. 57 divided by 2 gives us a factor of 28.5 to divide into 1ft (the height of 1 cubic foot) to find that a 1/2" layer of ice weighs more than shingles per square foot. I'm not going to worry about the weight of shingles.
recital carrots
And I suddenly really want to play piano
Somehow I, and everyone else here, read your post as "vote for the worst of two evils to shift the general political landscape by protest and making the lesser of two evils have to work extra hard to be less evil than the slightly-less evil greater of two evils". Re-reading, I can see your point, but somehow we all misunderstood it
Why not vote for the lesser of two evils and still protest them in office?
Exactly this. If you need more light, fog lights (a wide but flat beam) do wonders in neighborhoods, especially around corners. Sure, I can see some benefit of illuminating the whole body of a person, but their lower half should be sufficient. Quite frankly, if someone can't see them with low beams, they weren't going to meaningfully react any faster with high beams. They're either driving too fast, the pedestrian is stepping out too fast, or the road is too narrow.
It's wild how this whole post is about the good of other people but my opinion of respecting non-driving people at the same time isn't as well-received.
view more: next ›
Rear view cameras have been federally required on passenger vehicles since module year 2018 in the US market. So yeah, regardless of the error, it's a recall because the result makes the vehicle noncompliant.