InputZero

joined 10 months ago
[–] InputZero@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

The Vice President does have a powerful voice, but except for very specific situations they don't have any power. So while Harris may have more or less supported Israel's war, as a Vice President she can't do anything about it. She also won't become the president so this whole discussion is mute.

[–] InputZero@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Leopard Eating People's Paces

I just pictured a leopard that would pounce on people's footprints and eat those. Like dirt and all, I loled.

[–] InputZero@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Sometimes I downvote my own comment just to add a little chaos.

[–] InputZero@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago (14 children)

Anon isn't dumb, just simple. Nuclear energy can be the best solution for certain situations. While renewables are the better choice in every way, they're effectiveness isn't equally distributed. There are places where there just isn't enough available renewable energy sources year round to supply the people living there. When energy storage and transmission methods are also not up to the task, nuclear becomes the best answer. It shouldn't be the first answer people look to but it is an answer. An expensive answer but sometimes the best one.

Also nuclear waste doesn't have to be a problem. If anyone was willing to cover the cost of burning it in a breeder reactor for power or burry it forever. It just is because it's expensive.

[–] InputZero@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I have a gut feeling that his talk of tariffs is a bluff. Even if it's not my gut still tells me there's going to be exceptions for certain things that are big money makers for Trump and his allies. Trump's administration is not going to tax themselves unless they can provide a loophole to get themselves out of it. Ultimately it's the consumer who pays for tariffs, but they're entire purpose is to slow down trade and if that costs Trump and his allies too much of their wealth it won't happen.

Trump is as predictable as he is unpredictable because he doesn't stay consistent. He changes what he says and does to be perceived as best he can in that moment. Which makes understanding his actions a little easier, his past actions are irrelevant to his future decisions, it's just about what's in his head in the moment. Which is just a lot of words to say that Trump, his administration, and his allies are just chaos, and you never really know what chaos will bring except a change in the status quo. It's not looking optimistic though.

[–] InputZero@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Being real for a moment, the way that the next election cycle begins immediately once the previous one ends is a bit of a burden. I'm already tired of hearing about 'Decision 2028'.

[–] InputZero@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

I was thinking Sabotage. Turn that scene from Star Trek Beyond into a reality.

[–] InputZero@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Today I learned that magnetic components of the electric system use a different type of resistance. It's not the same as inductance though?

[–] InputZero@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

How difficult asbestos remediation can be depends a lot on the situation. Regardless of the situation people working near or on asbestos require respirators, bunny suits, many vacuums, and more to handle asbestos safely. Not the best conditions to work in but definitely not the worst.

Where the work is being done says a lot about how difficult it'll be. As an example take a single detached house, asbestos remediation wouldn't be too difficult. The residents can leave the home so there's less concern about inadvertently exposing the public. It gets a lot more difficult when the work is being done in say a train terminal for example. The terminal cannot be closed for a month so work must be done alongside the public. Now a whole system needs to be put it place. It becomes a lot easier to just leave the asbestos alone, as long as it's not turned into a dust it's not dangerous.

[–] InputZero@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

Unfortunately there's a bit of pressure to osbficate the core idea of a publication in academia. While the ideal academics try to hold themselves to is to freely exchange information, for researchers who are paid to study very neiche topics there's an insensitive to put some resistance into others entering their field. There is only so much funding and one more team means more competition. So some researchers who find themselves in that position will intentionally complicate their published work as a way to create a disincentive to others from crowding their field. It sucks but the reality is that funding and money come before the faithful pursuit of knowledge.

Also, some people just suck at writing.

[–] InputZero@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Asbestos definitely causes inflammation when tissues are exposed to it, I wouldn't recommend that anyone lick asbestos. One exposure wouldn't do much. That said I'm pretty sure the act of picking asbestos up and bringing it to your face and breathing it in would be the most dangerous part of that.

[–] InputZero@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Perhaps not the UN, but I agree that I am uncomfortable with Elon Musk at the helm. I'd prefer to see an international non-profit take control. Even just a regular boring board of directors, at least then it would be the devil that we know.

view more: next ›