this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2025
256 points (90.0% liked)

Technology

63375 readers
4394 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 8 hours ago

With all the rounds of layoffs they've had, their remaining employees would need to be quite stupid to give a shit what this disloyal piece trash says.

[–] schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business 99 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

"Work 50% longer weeks so you can make something that'll both make me richer AND cost you your jobs!" is not the motivational speech he thinks it is.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 19 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I don't even know what AGI is, and I read the headline as "rich disconnected from reality asshole".

Turns out I was right.

[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 6 points 10 hours ago

A General ignoramus

[–] meeeeetch@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

Wait, are these AI boosters bragging about how close they are to building God the torture that Roko's Basilisk is inflicting on us all?

[–] dan1101@lemm.ee 40 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Let's work 20 hour weeks then. Who wants AGI other than war pigs and billionaires?

[–] RisingSwell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 8 hours ago

I mean, we could get a rogue agi take over the world. It might not even be worse lmao

[–] SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee 3 points 8 hours ago

WarPigs by Sabbath was about the future.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 35 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (2 children)

If it's in reach working 60 hour weeks, it's also in reach working 40 hour weeks, it will just take 1/3rd longer. ;)

[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 29 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Let's be real, it'll probably happen faster on 40 hour work weeks than 60.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 20 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

lots of evidence starting to point to it'd be quicker in 32 hour weeks than 40

[–] InnerScientist@lemmy.world 209 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

That's why I bake my cake at 2608°C for ~1,8 minutes, it just works™

[–] alykanas@slrpnk.net 113 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Project Manager here, and where I’m from it’s common knowledge that 9 women can have a baby in a month .

[–] isaaclyman@lemmy.world 38 points 13 hours ago

Or!—hear me out—one woman whose 8 co-gestators were just laid off by someone who doesn’t understand what their job was

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kambusha@sh.itjust.works 7 points 9 hours ago

You can’t produce a baby in one month by getting nine women pregnant.

[–] Dindonmasker@sh.itjust.works 17 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Burnt crust full of liquid cake. yum!

[–] 3dmvr@lemm.ee 55 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

If it can be reached in 60 hour work weeks it can be reached in 40, but nah mfs should rush to get themselves replaced

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 16 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

If it can be reached in 60 hour work weeks, then it can be reached in 40 hour work weeks be hiring a second person.

If management isn't willing to put the effort in of hiring the required staff, why would I want to work the job of 2 people for 1 persons pay?

[–] frezik@midwest.social 6 points 10 hours ago

IT project management doesn't work that way, but it doesn't matter much. 60 hour work weeks wouldn't help, either.

[–] flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz 129 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

lol, because if they work 40-hour weeks they might create it a couple of weeks later

[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 61 points 13 hours ago (4 children)

Or, worse, they might actually have to hire enough people to actually do the job. Why hire 100 people with good work life balance, when you can hire 60 people that aren't allowed to have lives or families.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 27 points 11 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

No, but lets go get some margaritas.

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 hours ago

Bloody Mary's are back on the menu!

[–] Flisty@mstdn.social 9 points 10 hours ago

Slushy the rich?

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 7 points 8 hours ago
[–] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 53 points 14 hours ago

This is almost too depressing to be funny.

[–] aramis87@fedia.io 23 points 12 hours ago (5 children)

Or, y'know, he could hire 50% more programmers / contractors, instead of overworking his current staff

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 7 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

There's an upper limit to how many bodies you can throw at a task.

9 women won't make a baby in one month.

[–] greybeard@lemmy.one 5 points 7 hours ago

But you can make an average of 1 baby a month in 9 months with 9 woman. It's all about proper planning and budgeting over longer periods.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago

That wouldn't allow him to also simultaneously pay low wages.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 13 points 11 hours ago

So he's saying it's not in reach then.

[–] RegalPotoo@lemmy.world 24 points 13 hours ago (4 children)

They talk about AGI like it's some kind of intrinsically benevolent messiah that is going to come along and free humanity of limitations rather than a product that is going to be monetised to make a few very rich people even richer

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 19 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Disgusting prasite seeking free labour

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MudMan@fedia.io 16 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

You know it's bad when I had to click all the way through to the body of the article to verify this isn't a The Onion thing. Do we still have a "Not The Onion" space here?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 12 points 13 hours ago

I hope they tell him to get fucked.

[–] Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml 7 points 12 hours ago

A liar, scam artist, and scumbag.

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 11 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

If you all work harder we’ll be able to fire you and increase my bonus!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 14 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Real AGI is a Guillotine that only removes the heads of dragons.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 10 points 13 hours ago

maybe ai should work that extra time.

[–] alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 14 hours ago

I thought Googlers were paid $500K+ and already worked 60-80 hours weeks?

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›