this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2025
486 points (97.8% liked)

News

24403 readers
6302 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Elon Musk and his "Department of Government Efficiency" (DOGE) have been granted access to the U.S. Treasury’s federal payment system, raising concerns about security and misuse.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent approved the move after a top Treasury official was ousted for resisting.

Critics warn Musk could freeze payments to government programs or manipulate federal contracts.

The move coincides with DOGE’s takeover of the Office of Personnel Management.

Experts call it a dangerous power grab, as Musk holds no official government position.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AAA@feddit.org 19 points 2 days ago

And it's only a matter of time until until he boasts about it by posting someone's SN during an petty online argument.

[–] Rookwood@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago

Why are we coming up with nonsense scare tactic arguments? He's obviously just going to divert federal funds to himself via his companies.

He has no need for a bunch of shitters' SSN when he would just open himself to the greatest class action in history because it would take about 100 million of us to make him any significant wealth.

[–] ThatGuy46475@lemmy.world 197 points 3 days ago (2 children)

So does everyone, thanks Equifax

[–] dan@upvote.au 113 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (4 children)

It's weird that SSNs are treated as some sort of secret number given they don't have any security features. They were never supposed to be used the way they're used today, but there's no good alternative yet.

The US really needs a replacement, for example a national digital ID based on PKI (public key infrastructure) where you can generate new ID numbers based on a private key. Each bank, lender, employer, etc that needs it would get a unique ID that only works for them, and you could revoke access for just that one company if needed.

Kinda like how OAuth/OIDC login works, where you can log in to sites using your Google account, Apple account, self-hosted Authentik or Authelia, etc. but the site you're logging in to never sees your password. If a site/app misbehaves, you revoke their access to the account, and everything else that uses the account can keep working.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 1 points 1 day ago

And also the same thing but for payments, phone numbers, email addresses, physical addresses, etc.

We're all giving away so much personal information every time we make a transaction, and we've all seen what these fuckers do with it.

[–] LedgeDrop@lemm.ee 21 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I agree in principle, but try explaining that to your grandmother.

[–] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Here's your ID. You can decide who gets to have it.

Easy. The average person isn't going to care about the nerdy shit behind it, any more than they care how Facebook works behind the scenes.

[–] nomy@lemmy.zip 14 points 3 days ago (2 children)

They've been pushing against a national ID for decades so good luck convincing grandma it's not the mark of the beast or something.

[–] dan@upvote.au 8 points 2 days ago

They've been pushing against a national ID

But the USA is already using a (very poor) national ID - the SSN.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"press this button on the app" is what that would boil down to.

[–] LedgeDrop@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

Yeah, I tried to help my grandma with installing/using a video conference app... at the end of the day, I just call her (and yes, she still has a landline) :).

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Kalysta@lemm.ee 2 points 2 days ago

Yup. My credit has been frozen since that hack.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

To be fair the social security number is not exactly the most secure thing in the world. More than likely there's a lot of people who have your social security number and you don't have any clue that they do.

That being said, I don't understand why he's being allowed this kind of access. Even with the Orange douchebag's blessing, there should be other people minding the store. Shouldn't there?

[–] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

there should be other people minding the store. Shouldn't there?

There was until they were removed and yes man installed

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 78 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Everyone has my social security number. It's one of the stupidest security fails of all time that nobody seems to want to fix. And now there is an entire "credit protection" industry so it will remain that way.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago (2 children)

What happens when we file our taxes? Will we even get our refunds?

[–] endeavor@sopuli.xyz 17 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Would be funny if there was a mass movement and nobody paid their taxes.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 27 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Unfortunately, most people have their taxes withheld from their paychecks, and file their returns so they get a refund.

If people didn't file returns, the IRS would end up with more money.

[–] dan@upvote.au 1 points 1 day ago

and file their returns so they get a refund.

which is unfortunate since it means you gave the government an interest-free loan during the year. It's better to adjust withholding amounts to try and break even, or owe money (but not too much that you get hit with an underpayment penalty)

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Diddlydee@feddit.uk 82 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Not mine. I live in a country that isn't an absolute joke.

[–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago

Must be nice

[–] LadyMeow@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 3 days ago

What’s it like? :(

[–] tal@lemmy.today 8 points 3 days ago (3 children)

If it's the UK, the government probably has assigned you a National Insurance number.

[–] Diddlydee@feddit.uk 30 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Yes, but apartheid boy has nothing to do with the UK.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago (2 children)

He should have nothing to do with the UK, but he's still sticking his fingers in British pies by petitioning for Tommy Robinson's release and promoting Reform UK.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 2 days ago

I hope they have otherwise he's not getting to get any employment.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 6 points 2 days ago

Elon Musk and his "Department of Government Efficiency" (DOGE)

Is that seriously what it's called? Elon Musk is producing enough cringe to power all of human civilization. I have no idea if this is the worst timeline or not, but it's certainly the most embarrassing.

[–] spooky2092@lemmy.blahaj.zone 32 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Thanks to Verizon/TMobile/AT&T being the swiss cheese fort Knox, I'd be surprised if Felon Skum didn't have it.

Companies have played fast and loose with our PII for so long that it's at a point where we need something else to act as that value so it's actually secret. But with this administration, that would end up being a wrist tattoo....

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

I already have a suspicion that he might already be leaking information out to third parties from Twitter (private messages, etc.), so...

[–] FellowHuman@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Why is Facebook 2auth reset harder, than stealing someones identity in US?

[–] dan@upvote.au 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Authentication and two-factor system have actual security features. Social security numbers have no security features at all. They were never designed to be used as a security token.

[–] StrawberryPigtails@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Because the social security number has become the default way to uniquely identify an individual in the US despite the fact that it was never intended for that function.

[–] FellowHuman@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I get that, I just can't comprehend, how you can do anything with it. In my country we have similar thing. We have "Birth number" and it is on every contract we sign. But just knowing it does jack shit. (But yeah, we also have identity card, and that changes number every renewal/loss)

More context:

For online sign you would need atleast 2 identifications (for example Identity cars and passport). And usualy thay make you come anyway to prove you're you.

It is bafeling to me, that some peaple in US have no means of identification.

For a long time, many companies treated the SSN as a sort of secure password that only the individual would know. Some companies still do. Others, like schools and the military, just treated it like what it is. A unique id number. If you know name, address and SSN, it's possible to do a lot of different things that can create headaches for the person who was targeted. New credit cards, bank accounts, loans, transferred utilities, rental agreements.

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago

Does he have one?

What is his?

[–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 43 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (4 children)

Just to culture shock Americans: it's not exactly the same but in Sweden our personal numbers are kept in the open. Even online. Searchable databases with names, phone numbers, addresses etc. It tells you if someone has a dog. It tells you if they have a car. Which car, even. Some tell you the income of the person you're searching for. Sites even exist that could tell you if I've commited a crime. Some people think that's unreasonable. Irresponsible even!

That said, as pertains to the article, the fact that he has that info seems pretty unreasonable and irresponsible.

[–] tiredofsametab@fedia.io 21 points 3 days ago (5 children)

At least in the past, you could use a person's ssn to open credit cards, change utilities, and generally ruin someone's life. Someone took out a credit card with my SSN when I was like 9 or 10 and it caused issues when I became an adult and tried to get a student loan for uni.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] 800XL@lemmy.world 27 points 3 days ago

Elon Musk has to go.

[–] JayDee@lemmy.world 25 points 3 days ago

Bruh who doesn't at this point?

[–] ansiz@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago

All of my data got breached multiple times going back to the dot-com bubble days, by Yahoo, the original 2015 OPM Beach and by two of the big credit bureaus for a start. If Musk has my social at this point it doesn't matter.

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Didn't Elon get hacked and his SS number leaked?

No, I'm not about to go search for that, but I'm pretty sure that happened, with the 23andme data breach...

[–] lemmus@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (2 children)

SSN is not a password and anyone who uses it like one doesn't understand security because you can't change it. It's a user ID, like a finger print or email address.

[–] zwerdlds@lemmy.ml 11 points 3 days ago

In principle yes; in practice, no.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ohellidk@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 days ago

I'm sure quite a few people have mine. SSN's aren't a secure thing at all. It should be updated.

load more comments
view more: next ›