this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2025
246 points (97.3% liked)

News

24232 readers
4186 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world 13 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

We have “land of the free” in our fucking theme song how are we fucking that up?

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

In Human Psychology it's a pretty well known phenomenon that those who loudly proclaim having certain virtues are the ones less likely to have such virtues.

If you go check the countries whose politicians loudly proclaim as having certain virtues (like being great Democracies or being a land of Freedom) that rule also seems to work pretty well.

[–] MITM0@lemmy.world 6 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

You were never the land of the free, it was basically a mockery of freedom

[–] MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Nah, we were substantially freer than most at first but that didn’t last long.

[–] LostWon@lemmy.ca 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Don't forget that "at first," a certain privileged group may have been freer, but not everyone.

[–] MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

Even then most were still freer here simply because of how remote everything was.

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 99 points 1 day ago (37 children)

Is that even legal. That’s some fucked up shit?

I’ll only allow people to study in the country if they don’t object to Genocide? What the fuck?

[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 63 points 1 day ago

Oh Hun, where we're going laws don't matter

Is it legal? No. Will it be stopped? I am not holding my breath.

[–] steventhedev@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes. The narrow case is that if you express support for a designated foreign terrorist organization that is grounds for denying your visa, or revoking your status. So if you are on a student visa and went to a protest wearing a hamas headband and carrying the flag then you'll end up on a plane out of the US.

Where it gets iffy is the question about people who showed up to a protest and didn't know or see or agree with the hamas flags being flown there

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Despite the Zionist rhetoric, Hamas != Palestine.

Saying "The Palestinians deserve to have a land of their own" is not the same as saying "I support Hamas."

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 3 points 1 day ago

Yes, but israel pays a lot to conflate the two.

Just like they try to conflate anti Zionism or anti Israeli genocide or apartheid as antisemitism.

[–] steventhedev@lemmy.world -3 points 1 day ago

Agree. The vast majority of people at those protests do not support Hamas as an organization and certainly not their methods. I simply believe they'll be accusing people at the rallies that did have Hamas/Hezbollah flags of guilt by association.

[–] alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago

He's trying to get foreigners out of the USA and trying to placate his right wing at the same time.

Honestly, I don't think getting a student visa cancelled is that bad. There are universities in other countries eager to accept foreign students and the tuition they pay.

Even China has a huge program to attract foreign students. I know people who studied there.

[–] tiredofsametab@fedia.io 3 points 1 day ago

Is that even legal

I'm not sure in the US, but many countries do put limits on what those on certain types of visas can do. That's definitely a thing here in Japan, although enforcement for participating in protests and stuff is generally pretty rare it seems.

load more comments (32 replies)
[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 41 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

2 of my egyptian comrades had to leave the country because the FBI started investigating them for terrorism after they attended and pro-palestinian protest

[–] rickdg@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago

Seems like the tactic is to flood federal judges and see which one breaks.

[–] Fungah@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm of two minds about this.

Like. If you're present in another country on a student Vida you're essentially a guest and a certain level of respect, and gratitude, I feel, is important for that privilege. Even if the right to protest is guaranteed for that country's citizens you are not citizens.

That being said I think our shared duty to do the right thing should bear more weight than any sense of obligation or hospitality.

Given the long dick of the US, rising racist sentiment, and the personal risk it takes to put yourself on the line for a greater cause, I think protesting is probably the right thing even if it is kind of rude.

For better or worse activism can be a big part of campus life and I don't think a culture of fear is conducive to a healthy academic sphere.

When I was in uni I was constantly dodging massive protests / counter protests from Israelis / Palestinians, having lectures interrupted. It annoyed the hell out of me at the time but in hindsight I'm grateful to have lived in a place where people could fight for their views, even if they supported Israel and were stupid dipshits.

[–] Euphorazine@lemmy.world 5 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Even if the right to protest is guaranteed for that country's citizens you are not citizens.

Doesn't the Constitution protect all people in the land, not just citizens?

[–] BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

It's somewhat tricky, it refers to 'the people' or 'persons', but some things don't make sense if you apply it to non-citizens. There's been cases to establish how it applies in regards to specific amendments, but I haven't heard of something coming up that definitively established whether that applies for the right to assemble.

load more comments
view more: next ›