113
It's a trap, Elon did this to his workers and never paid
this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2025
113 points (95.2% liked)
News
24249 readers
4086 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Hope you all enjoyed government services. You're not getting any more.
At least not from the Federal government.
"A senior administration official told NBC News that they expect 5%-10% of the federal workforce to quit, which, they estimate, could lead to around $100 billion in savings."
If they quit now, and are paid for another 8 months, how does that save any money?
Similarly, if they quit and need to be replaced, you're going to spend more money hiring and training the replacement, so for 8 months you're paying double salary, one for the person who quit and one for their replacement...
It's hilarious you think they will be replacing them
Look at Musk and Twitter, same pattern.
- Fire everyone.
- Oh, shit!
- Pleasecomebackpleasecomeback
- Sue them back
5)H1B slaves
Bold of you to assume he cares enough to want to hire people back when everything burns
Oh they'll be replaced, with "private" workers supplied by Musk, etc.
The private "workers" will be AI or cheaply paid foreign workers.
They will be incapable of doing the job, not because they are incompetent, but because they were the lowest bid and lied.
After 2+ years of doing nothing they'll need to be replaced by more workers. The government can't function without them, so we'll hire twice as many, still paying less than the average American and pocketing the remainder.
After 4+ years, assuming the administration leaves, they'll all be fired by the new administration and Americans will be brought in. They'll have to do 4+ years worth of backlog plus the current job. After these 4 years they be deemed as incompetent and we'll start the whole cycle over again.
I honestly see this as more tree-shaking. It gives "disloyal" folks a way select themselves out, and provides a lot of empty seats to fill with "their" people.
Combined with the Section F stuff, I think this will also have a net negative impact to the economy of the greater DC-metro area. Yanno, those people that voted against Trump in the election. It's hard to not see all this as punitive.
Stealing what someone else said in the other thread: It is 7 months pay OR $25k whichever is LOWER. Watch as Trump misrepresents it as whichever is HIGHER.
Unless someone is literally about to start a new job in two weeks anyway, why the hell would they take such a pitiful buyout? $25k is jack shit these days especially when the cost is your entire livelyhood.
It’s on the lower end - but 4 weeks severance isn’t uncommon in the corporate world - so 25k isn’t terrible.
It is when your replacement is someone with undying loyalty to a fascist dictator. It's not about efficiency, it's about loyalty and ideology. The more people leave, the more powerful ~~Trump Musk~~ Trusk becomes.
Also it prevents them from joining another government position for 5 years or they have to repay it before they start the job
and the funds probably have to be allocated by congress.. as it is they and NOT a diaper-wearing buffoon in lifted shoes, that controls the 'purse'.
even the maga nuts in congress should be pissed as hell at lord diaper's unconstitutional power and money grab.
Might have to look at that though, it's possible once the funds have been allocated to a department Congress extra less control over how there are used. As long as there's some loophole where the money can be spent on severance, and it doesn't cost more money than was allocated for the year(how can it? It's just paying people for not working)
This is what it looks like when some of the richest minds that russia can buy brainstorm ways to damage the US.
These people aren't going to get any money.
If you don't have another job lined up don't quit your job
It'd be funny if every single one of them took it.
Apart from all the people who will suffer and possibly die from the lack of social services.
Because I am guessing this offer doesn't go to people involved in, for example, leasing federal land to oil drillers.
Apart from all the people who will suffer and possibly die from the lack of social services.
People will suffer and die due to Trump's destruction of the country's infrastructure.
If all federal workers hypothetically quit, everybody in the US would sudenly realize very directly and immediately the disaster Trump has created and might decide to topple him and his henchmen.
But realistically they won't. So federal services wil slowly worsen and people will suffer more and more without doing anything about it, like the proverbial slowly-boiled frog.
That's how all dictatorships entrench themselves: things get slowly worse, but slowly enough that people don't want to take up arms, until it's too late to take up arms.
Maybe other nations should consider giving a tip, to entice them further. Just throwing around ideas
It's not a buyout. They can continue to WFH until September if they swear to resign. That's not a buyout, that's just continuing to work until you resign in the future. It also doesn't guarantee them their jobs, just that they won't be fired for not returning to the office (which is something the administration will probably going to have a hard time doing).
Paying people not to work? Sounds like the Department Of Government Efficiency at work
Art of the fuck up
"Fellas, it's been good to know ya"
This includes members of the military im sure.
It does not.
Uh. Without regard to department?
I mean, okay, if more people resign in department A than B, to some degree you can transfer people, but it's not like there's some generic "federal employee" skillset.
EDIT: I guess if too many people did leave in one area, that you could re-hire there, and eight months severance isn't actually that large. I guess if someone were that on-the-edge about their job, it might not be that big a deal anyway.
Maybe it's a standard practice in business layoffs. Not familiar with practice there. You'd rather have people on the edge of leaving leave then people that want to stay.
I'm also kind of wondering if there are any jobs that hire full-time for limited periods of time, like maybe a Census poll worker. Like, if the government only planned to hire someone for three months and he just extended an offer for eight months severance if they walk out the door, that may wind up being a little awkward.
FTS. They got the best benefits. We need them to stay and just lay low. For all our sakes.
With the bills proposed by the house right now federal workers won't have great benefits for long. Benefits are better on the county level in many cases already.