this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2025
82 points (80.1% liked)

MeanwhileOnGrad

1473 readers
315 users here now

"Oh, this is calamity! Calamity! Oh no, he's on the floor!"

Welcome to MoG!


Meanwhile On Grad


Documenting hate speech, conspiracy theories, apologia/revisionism, and general tankie behaviour across the fediverse. Memes are welcome!


What is a Tankie?


Alternatively, a detailed blog post about Tankies.

(caution of biased source)


Basic Rules:

Sh.itjust.works Instance rules apply! If you are from other instances, please be mindful of the rules. — Basically, don't be a dick.

Hate-Speech — You should be familiar with this one already; practically all instances have the same rules on hate speech.

Apologia(Using the Modern terminology for Apologia) No Defending, Denying, Justifying, Bolstering, or Differentiating authoritarian acts or endeavours, whether be a Pro-CCP viewpoint, Stalinism, Islamic Terrorism or any variation of Tankie Ideology.

Revisionism — No downplaying or denying atrocities past and present. Calling Tankies shills, foreign/federal agents, or bots also falls under this rule. Extremists exist. They are real. Do not call them shills or fake users as it handwaves their extremism.

Tankies can explain their views but may be criticised or attacked for them. Any slight infraction on the rules above will immediately earn a warning and possibly a ban.

Off-topic Discussion — Do not discuss unrelated topics to the point of derailing the thread. Stay focused on the direct content of the post as opposed to arguing.

You'll be warned if you're violating the instance and community rules. Continuing poor behaviour after being warned will result in a ban or removal of your comments. Bans typically only last 24 hours, but each subsequent infraction will double the amount. Depending on the content, the ban time may be increased. You may request an unban at any time.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

https://lemmy.ml/comment/16125064

Starring: blindbunny, BrainInABox and of course, the one and only, Cowbee!

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 2 points 2 hours ago

I'm just always wondering about then being pro trans and pro-governement that is very anti-queer, I just can't.

[–] socsa@piefed.social 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Literally the only place I have ever experienced transphobia on Lemmy was from a hexbear, who called me a chaser for saying that my ex was a trans woman.

[–] rami@ani.social 2 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

I might be missing something. they may be making assumptions about you but how is calling someone a chaser transphobic?

[–] lemonmelon@lemmy.world 10 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Calling someone a chaser solely on the grounds that they claim to have dated a trans woman could imply "no cis male could be interested in a trans woman outside of pure fetish bait", which is awfully reductive. It casts the trans woman as an object in the relationship rather than an equal partner.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 day ago

"You people," huh?

I hate how they're incapable of actually thinking, so they latch onto specific phrases so they can pretend you're a racist so they don't have to engage with what you're actually saying

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 56 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

Never, under any circumstances, use the phrase "you people" unless you're in the mood for everyone in the universe to act like you just lost the argument.

[–] lemonmelon@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Solid advice. It can be completely benign, but people will still pounce on it for an "easy win".

[–] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

You people make some good points.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 19 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Then what do you people want me to say?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sheepy@lemm.ee 40 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (11 children)

Imagine not being able to tell the difference between "I don't believe half of their users are trans" and "I don't believe in their users being trans".

Demographics isn't transphobic. Using trans people as a shield from criticism is.

EDIT: I looked over the October survey. The graphs aren't the cleanest but the data is there: 15% of all asked identified as trans, with another 9% as trans non-binary. A sample size of 600 to the 2300 monthly users is also really good, so the data ought to be very representative.

[–] Fecundpossum@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (11 children)

This is part of why the hard left, or at least the current version of it, has basically lost me. I firmly support the right of trans and queer folks to exist in the same relative peace and safety as everyone else, but in todays lefty political spaces you’re not allowed to disagree with what a trans person says without being transphobic. You can’t criticize a trans person for their shit takes or bad behavior without being transphobic. I even had a years long friendship end because raising the issue of a clear mental health episode involving paranoid delusion unrelated to their transition or transness made me a “dangerous transphobe”. This person had of course been hospitalized for self harm and major mental heath issues prior, and a desire to keep them safe was “transphobic”

Transphobia is bad. Trans exceptionalism is also bad.

[–] Droggelbecher@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Lots of leftists and even leftist groups/spaces acknowledge and criticize the bigotry of lowered expectations. Sometimes called the soft bigotry of lowered expectations. It's when you cut members of marginalized groups more slack simply because they're marginalized. Whether someone means it or not, it perpetuates that someone is less smart, less capable, simply because they're (gender)queer, a POC, disabled, etc. What you're describing fits the bill.

I'm part of leftist groups that call it out for the bigotry it is, and I hope you can find a leftist group that does, too. They do exist. Or maybe otherwise, you can read a little about the bigotry of lowered expectations and bring it up for discussion with groups that are unknowingly guilty of it. Maybe they can learn from you.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 36 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Meanwhile, Lemmy Devs are saying the "transgender topic" is promoted by "the bourgeoisie", and how "biological men" shouldn't be competing in "women's sports"

https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/25213024

(also, who the fuck says "biological men" in the transgender context, its called transgender women)

[–] recreationalcatheter@lemm.ee 34 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (9 children)

(also, who the fuck says "biological men" in the transgender context, its called transgender women)

Conservatives and other right wing that's who. That's why you hear tankie leadership saying it.

Tankies are anti-lgbtq at their core. Anything to simp for totalitarians.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

To be fair, hexbear did ban those devs for those comments.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (16 children)

It seems unlikely that half of their users would be transgender, given that transgender people make up roughly .5% of the overall population; gay people (gay men + lesbians) make up roughly 4.5-5% of the overall population the last time I looked at demographics. All of the LGBTQ+ people together make up about 6% of the total population in the US.

These numbers might have changed somewhat in the last year or two since I last check surveys, but it's not likely that it's changed enough to move the numbers sharply.

I know that there was some investigative reporting in my state a few months ago trying to figure out how many minors would be affected by a state-level ban on insurance covering gender-affirming care for minors, and the number was in in the very low double digits. The same kind of numbers of athletes would be affected by bans on 'biological males' competing in womens' sports.

I'm just saying that it just doesn't seem very likely that an instance with thousands of users would have that kind of demographics, esp. when you consider that Hexbear broadly has a monolithic political identity.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago (26 children)

The fuck with this obsession of telling people whether they are or are not trans online?

load more comments (26 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›