Sounds like mastodon and other services ought to really support this extension though.
I actually don't care to grow my readership, I've been blogging for 20 years now but it's more of a personal space to write some opinions. Nevertheless thanks for the long analysis. I think some things go against the my style, but will seem what I can retain.
OK, so is lemmy out of standard or not? Like I can understand why lemmy doesn't support apub notes, as it's out of scope, but why does mastodon support articles badly?
You can actually do that on lemmy already like so. Sorting by new doesn't use the voting. Hell you can even sort them like a forum by sorting by "new comments"
I am the author. Heard you were talking shit...
I kid, I kid :D
I insist that in their current form, reddit (and lemmy) can serve as both forums and link aggregators with comment sections.
Not gonna lie, I'd love for better integration between services, but I am fairly sure I saw lemmy devs adamantly insisting they're following apub and mastodon is doing it wrong so 🤷
Benned and Jerrys!
I think Mastodon is very far from standard. Way I hear it from the developers, it's lemmy that is following the Apub standard. But I will disclaim that I'm not an expert to judge either way.
As for the posts outside communities? That makes sense lemmy-wise I think. Where would those posts be? But it doesn't make sense for Discourse, since they are indeed separated into topics.
Why doesn't discourse simply make their different topics into communities is the question
Let's say you find a year old discussion, you don't bother to read 120 pages, so you just ask your question at the end. If you're lucky enough not to be in a forum that won't flame you for necroing and not searching, you're given a link to a page. You visit that page but don't find the answer. Then ask again. Maybe this time you get a correct link, or maybe you get flamed this time.
See how it's easy to make hypotheticals? Not to disrespect your preferences, but this approach is downright inane. What you'e describing is working despite the software, not because of it. As others mentioned in this thread, you get the exact opposite reactions to another forum about automobiles.
You know what is superior to this? Having a lemmy community about this one motorcycle model, with an FAQ or wiki on the side. People can ask a question as a new thread, and guess what, people can link them to a previously answered thread, just like they would link them to a specific page in your gigathread. Nothing functionally changes here. The lack of threading or sorting by new comments doesn't change the experience. It's the willingness to be nice to newbies that matters.
What you're describing is simply changing a lemmy community into a single thread in a bbforum. It is an objectively worse scenario.
In lemmy you start with a generic topic. Say, automobiles. If it starts getting too busy, you start two new communities, cars and motorcycles, if those get too busy, you expand to brands and models. Each of them nicely organized and easily searchable by titles.
What I see here is a community that coalesced around an old forum software and did the best it could. Unlike most others, it happened to have the right people to make the best of it and find a working system with what they got. But again, it's not the software, it's the people, which is proven by so many similar communities in similar software just failing miserable instead.
I would argue that this community would work much better with a software much better suited for it.
I'm not upset, mate. I'm just perplexed why you're confidently making statements which directly contract the article and appear as if you didn't read it. But you do you.
view more: next ›
I was considering mentioning that GenX stuff, but I felt it was too obscure and would only serve to posture my creds :)