this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2024
356 points (97.6% liked)

Fediverse

27918 readers
776 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/28930199

A bit of an effortpost :)

Please do crosspost in more fitting communities if you think of any

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Stern@lemmy.world 3 points 48 minutes ago (1 children)
[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 43 minutes ago

I was considering mentioning that GenX stuff, but I felt it was too obscure and would only serve to posture my creds :)

[–] EmperorHenry@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Forums still exist, there only for extremely niche things though...Like high powered flashlights

[–] Stern@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Somethingawful is still going strong, even after Lowtax died.

[–] Chadus_Maximus@lemm.ee 3 points 3 hours ago

Out of all the things, Reddit is probably still the best for flashlight purchasing advice.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 13 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Much easier access.

You make a reddit account or a discors account and you have limited access to thousands of forums.

Imagine giving your email address and making a password and solving a captcha hundreds of times instead. Who would choose to?

And don't even get me started on the ease of operating these subreddits and discord channels instead of building and hosting websites.

[–] ericjmorey@discuss.online 6 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Discord and Reddit also had uniquely improved their UIs over the existing options.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Until that API nonsense I was always using old.reddit because the redesign was ass.

Discord is cool tho, better than skype gui for sure.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 36 points 13 hours ago

We trusted corporations.

I'd like to think we've collectively learned our lessons, but watching people migrate from Reddit to fucking Discord makes me think that we really have not and probably never will.

[–] shadowedcross@sh.itjust.works 20 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I don't know, but every fucking group's reliance on Discord pisses me off. I'm very much into modding my games, the problem is that every damn mod author wants to do support only on Discord, which means probably more than half of my 200 servers are just for that.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

yep. it's free and easy, and becoming the default. :|

[–] shadowedcross@sh.itjust.works 23 points 11 hours ago

Seriously. I don't mind it as a platform for socialising, but it's terrible as a support platform, and it goes against the idea of open and accessible information.

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

ah yes, the age old tale of "the internet sucks and people are stupid"

If you've ever tried hosting a web based solution you'll know exactly what i mean. The entirety of web hosting is a disaster. The entire mountain of web code is a nightmare, and the collection of website based frameworks do nothing more than burn electricity and man hours to create a fucking button on a screen.

as for discord, i haven't puzzled that one out yet, i don't understand. Probably lazy developers and the community aspect, it's a forum, but free, and worse. And now you can shitpost with random people you don't even know!

Personally, i believe that enshittifcation is an inevitability. You put somebody in a room with something, and when you take them out, that thing will somehow have gotten more complex, and thus probably worse.

[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Discord, at one point, was better than a lot of other app on the market, and they were one of the first where you could just create an account and join any group, for free.

It became the standard, and now we're stuck with that shit

eventually people are going to have to wisen up to the VC funding strategy. It's not going to last forever, i hope.

[–] recklessengagement@lemmy.world 25 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

This is a fantastic read. I wasnt around for the prime days of forums but I did experience them a bit.

I'm becoming extremely concerned about the number of topics and projects that are migrating to Discord. My main issue is that it is not and never will be publically indexed, and among other problems, is itself a corporate walled garden we consider to be "one of the good ones".

I really hope we find and establish a "low executive cost" solution before the next time Discord fumbles (which is inevitable) and we can claw some of that activity back.

But people are so used to seamless voice and video chat nowadays - and that's a technical hurdle that AFAIK, no open-source self-hostable projects have come close to solving.

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

But people are so used to seamless voice and video chat nowadays - and that’s a technical hurdle that AFAIK, no open-source self-hostable projects have come close to solving.

this is unironically such a big problem, there are great voice chatting solutions, mumble, and the handful of other ones that exist out there.

There are basically 0 good usable video conferencing/sharing softwares out there. The same goes for desktop streaming. If we just focused like, a little bit more of our energy on these two things, i think the world would unironically get better. It's 2024, h264 runs on a CPU like nothing, why haven't we figured out how to do these things yet?

The ones that do exist are likely to be web based, and thus, webRTC, the dreaded behemoth of both web support and also, generally poor implementation. I just want mumble but with support for video streaming, how hard is it >:(

[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 4 hours ago

It’s 2024, h264 runs on a CPU like nothing, why haven’t we figured out how to do these things yet?

It's not about the hardware. (Not like it's that ubiquitous anyway; I'm daily driving a machine from 2017)

I'm going to guess part of it is because for the things that matter to the people who do end up having to code, test and distribute stuff, something like "seamless screen sharing" or "video conference" doesnt really matter.

And IMO, that's good if we want to Recover the Web.

The idea behind being in something like a jabber chatroom, or a web forum, is that I can pay attention to 12 channels (or whatever) at a time, read one or two, reply in three others, etc. Text is so un-invasive that I can just explore without bothering myself or anyone else.

In comparison, something like audio chat or video chat is more presence-encompassing. You can't really "push to talk" three different things to three chatrooms at about once, and you likely can but won't want to listen to three chatrooms full of people at the same time. For something like a videoconference you not only need a camera, but a good behind-you because not only who knows who or what will be showing back there.

In the end, something like a simple jabber-like chatroom is far easier and more productive to work on, even before we get to the coding part.

Not to mention: this is computer stuff. No one really likes to work on "debt", which is what "Foo has to have 'screen sharing' because Discord has it" ultimately boils down to.

[–] sep@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Matrix+elements is very easy to selfhost in any homelab. works well enough for goverments. Federated and easy end to end encryption. And one can easily set up a web archive bridge forvarchiveable rooms.

That beeing said i still think IRC is the best for pure text chat.

[–] recklessengagement@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

But neither have seamless voice chat/screen sharing, which is a staple of Discord that users are very used to.

[–] toastal@lemmy.ml -1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

What do you need screen sharing for? This comes up so, so rarely for me.

Besides the expensive Matrix option the parent suggested, IRC covers text fine. Mumble handles low-latency, low-resource voice chat with positional audio for games. XMPP uses more resources that IRC (but can have encryption) but a ton less resources than Matrix which makes it suitable for self-hosting—my partner & I do voice/video calls over my home server fine & Movim is working on group calls with a Web UI (tho it should be noted both Zoom & Jitsi use XMPP under the hood).

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

What do you need screen sharing for? This comes up so, so rarely for me.

it's convenient, also it'd be nice if it had the feature capability.

Mumble is great, but if there was something like mumble, that implemented video sharing, that would be miles better, though a lot of people would probably still use mumble, as it's fine.

From what i've dug into, basically every video sharing capable setup is based on web technology, and i simply refuse to go near web technology unless i WANT to use a web browser. It's just, worse, in so many ways.

[–] toastal@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 hours ago

Well Discord, Slack, & others are web tech too so it’s not like avoiding it is easy. If I have to use these services, I would prefer it be in the browser’s sandbox.

Even still, almost all debug, troubleshoot, pairing session I have done in the last 4 years have been done over Upterm or Tmate, which is much, much lighter on bandwidth & not crushed by video compression.

[–] cyclohexane@lemmy.ml 34 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

People prefer centralization, and it makes sense. The Fediverse resolves most of the issues with decentralization, but so does centralization, which came way sooner, and arguably did it better.

Also, people seem to forget that Facebook was pretty cool back then. It had superior features, and was not the buggy mess it is today.

[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago

Anything big enough becomes a public restroom. Cooperation and syncronization between groups small enough not to devolve in that way seems to be an especially promising path forward.

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Mostly FB wasn’t a trove of far right shit and it was before a lot of the scandals pointing out to what extent our data is sold.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bamfic@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago
[–] LunchMoneyThief@links.hackliberty.org 22 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Millennials naively assumed that the following generations would just naturally be as computer literate as they are. We're dealing with people now who think that wi-fi is internet service.

The author of the article is specifically referring to bulletin board forums when describing forums. Link aggregators like reddit are not forums. They are comments sections.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

I am the author. Heard you were talking shit...

I kid, I kid :D

I insist that in their current form, reddit (and lemmy) can serve as both forums and link aggregators with comment sections.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 6 points 13 hours ago

VC backed user experience

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 39 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (30 children)

If there was a Reddit/Lemmy style website (where people create communities for various subjects but it's all available from the same website using the same credentials) with forum style discussions I would be outta here in a moment.

Ongoing discussions with bumps are so much better for knowledge accumulation (that's the reason why they're still used by specialized communities), the major issue with forums, as pointed out, is the hassle of having to go from one website to another to talk about various subjects and needing to sign up to each one of them.

As for solving the "little Kings" issue, dumb backend, smart frontend. Remove admins from the equation, those hosting are only there to host. People moderate communities but communities can easily be replaced. People create a frontend to access the backend but from a user point of view it doesn't make a difference what frontend they use, they will get access to the same content.

The fact that I've written this comment a dozen times since last year proves a point, Reddit/Lemmy style websites just lead to content being repeated again and again. This comment will get lost to time just like all the other times I shared my opinion on the subject. On a forum it would be part of the ongoing discussion and anyone who wanted to go through the whole thread where all discussions on that subject to place would read it, no matter how long it had been since I posted.

[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 4 hours ago

the major issue with forums, as pointed out, is the hassle of having to go from one website to another to talk about various subjects and needing to sign up to each one of them.

Honestly the "having to sign up" part would be trivial to solve if topical forums just globally adopted OpenID sign-in or similar. No need to have one account per community if you already have (or "are") an account in the World.

But even then, there's a point to having to go through a sign-up process. At least some sort of vetting. We have seen how far have fallen all the communities that have ever relaxed sign-ups (as another comment in this thread shows, there was once a time when FB only allowed educated people in).

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 hours ago

I don't know, if there's any hosted instances of it, or how mature it is, but one of the Lemmy devs has experimented with using the frontend of phpBB (basically the software for old-school forums) with a Lemmy backend: !lemmybb@lemmy.ml

To my knowledge, they had some pretty quick successes with it and one might be able to just slap this onto a server right now...

[–] MusketeerX@lemm.ee 13 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

I don't disagree.

There is one forum I still participate in:

https://forums.whirlpool.net.au/forum/

It's mostly tech-focussed and Australia-centric, but it does have other topics like sport, TV etc..

I wish there were more like this.

I hate that the bulk of online discussion is now owned/monopolised by a couple of huge corporations.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] yessikg@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 17 hours ago

There are several forum software companies working on ActivityPub support, I know both Discourse and NodeBB have been working on it for a while

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (6 children)

It seems to me the only thing you're missing from the functionality you want on lemmy is a sorting system which just bumps any threads with new comments to the top. I don't like that approach myself, but if that's what you want I don't see a reason not to have it. Why don't you suggest it to the lemmy devs? It doesn't seem like it would be difficult to add it.

EDIT: Actually, nevermind, this already exists with the "New Comments" feature. Why don't you just use that? https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/?dataType=Post&listingType=Subscribed&sort=NewComments

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (25 replies)
[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

Preach brother!

[–] De_Narm@lemmy.world 58 points 22 hours ago (4 children)

While I do agree with the problems identified, I can't help but think they also made forums a lot better. Due to the lower discoverability and higher effort to actually join communities felt more personal. You interacted with smaller groups and came to know specific people. I still have friends from back then.

On larger platforms, I never had that. Even lemmy, which is small in comparison has enough people that I barely even think about specific users. Let alone speak with them on a personal level.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 35 points 22 hours ago (4 children)

That's a double-edged knife. yes it feels closer and personal, but it also breeds inside groups and cliques. I've been turned away from multiple forums because I was too ASD to fit in with their culture but there was no other space to discuss it. And this can go much much worse than just a culture-fit. Not to mention that if that forum becomes too popular, that culture is anyway lost.

However using lemmy there's the best of both worlds. You can still keep your instance small enough so that you know your local users, but also be able to interact with the larger community without the extra effort I explained. For example there's instances out there like beehaw and hexbear which through have managed to retain their own culture and standards even while federated.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] celsiustimeline@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Fewer barriers to entry and faster responses from people using Reddit/Facebook/Discord. Forums are great for indexing and posterity, but they're absolute dogshit for meaningful information exchange. Unless you know exactly what your problem is, to the point of barely needing help, you probably won't be able to word your question in a way that experts can understand, and the assistance they provide generally comes with a lot of assumptions that you're familiar with X, Y, and Z. I can't tell you how many forum posts I've read over the decades that just sort of end without any resolution of the original problem. It's all too easy to lose pertinent information in multi page threads (esp if the pages extend into the 10s and 100s), and new users, the ones most in need of assistance, are overwhelmed by experts overestimating the new user's abilities. Discord on the other hand lets you instantly get feedback from experts and allows you to refine your question in real time.

[–] Flamekebab@piefed.social 10 points 18 hours ago

Whilst I don't disagree with your points, don't they primarily apply to specifically a support forum?

[–] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 5 points 16 hours ago

Fewer barriers to entry? A forum is just a simple registration, usually with email confirmation and maybe a captcha once. Facebook wants real life personal information, blocks VPNs and nowadays I think you have to even provide phone numbers or a custom video of yourself. Discord, ON EVERY LOGIN, wants me to solve a 2 level captcha that loves to repeat itself multiple times and to do a two factor authentication while being just a bloated confusing mess of a chat. Reddit also now blocks VPNs like crazy and loves to shadowban you if you're inactive for a while (or whatever random reason they went with that I cannot think of).

They're the absolute worst possible choices and exclude countless of people.

[–] linearchaos@lemmy.world 18 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (15 children)

Article claims the forums were expensive and difficult to maintain. I thing it more likely that Facebook groups are epopular because people are already there.

Discord has done an amazing job at convenience. It's free, they have a rather generous API. The communities have created fantastic bots. But it's important to remember discord isn't a forum it's a live chat. Two people having a live discussion is a very different thing than two people carefully curating their responses in a forum.

Reddit and Lemmy are curated knowledge repository wrapped in discourse. Which brings an advantage over old forums.

More or less I would argue that the article is missing convenience as a driving factor.

Edit: I poorly skimmed this article and mistook some of its points. This comment deserves no upvotes and I'll circle back later and give some credible feedback.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 14 points 20 hours ago

While your post does mention notifications which really helps with engagement and was lacking from most forums, the main issue was IMHO lack of good mobile support of all the main forum platforms until as you said Discourse came along, but by then it was too late.

[–] s38b35M5@lemmy.world 15 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

I used to participate in (what was then) the largest and most active automotive enthusiast forum for a specific brand. They had forums for each major model run, and classifieds, etc. I'd go there for how-to's, detailed info, reviews, tips and tricks, and of course, to tall with like-minded people. Meet ups even spawned from these groups, and friendships were forged.

As it really picked up steam, though, the forum creators decided to monetize, as every large website grapples with how to sustain their growth. Unfortunately, they decided to implement ads, subscription/pay wall, and within a month, there were five competing websites. The majority of us left in the first two weeks.

Now that forum still exists, but the content is gone, deleted by users who didn't appreciate their content being monetized (sound familiar, June 2023?). The replacements? Some struggle on, and one or two are vibrant, but mostly, it imploded. There was one glorious pair of years though, when I (and thousands of others) spent hours every day on the forum, and every topic was covered.

In hindsight, the downfall was more than just the advertisements and pay walling. It was a few non-admins that were treated as defacto mods, and they had bad attitudes. Flaming anyone who asked questions that were asked before (this was before Google made searching easier), and also holding their own practices as the only way to maintain their cars.

The reddit versions of the forums were not remotely the same, with people coming and going and not really sticking around. The best place for the info is still forums, though I think they struggle with server upkeep and costs. It's sad to me, but all things change. I'm glad for archive.org.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›