Israel is doing their damnedest to start a war with Iran, and there's a non-zero chance that a sufficiently intense war between Israel and Iran will draw the US in for multiple reasons.
Babby's first conversation with a conservative, it would seem.
Switzerland neutrally carrying water for fascism as per usual. It would be terrible if they burned bridges with Russian and Chinese oligarchs.
Oh, well, Israel couldn't have THAT, of course
Jesus H. Christ.
Which are used to target unpopular fringe groups not regional majorities.
Oh, okay, they're too popular to do anything about. Phew. For a moment there I thought there might have been a consistent opposition to fascism.
A good omen for future operations, one hopes.
Instability is founded on the bones of children as well. There's no 'clean hands' option.
The issue is that backing Israel at this point is a contribution to instability.
No, dual-use facilities are generally regarded as legitimate targets so long as civilian workers are not explicitly targeted in the way one might target enemy personnel.
Well, that'll be good evidence for putting them on Interpol's red notices.
According to the ISW, the loss of Vuhledar will not fundamentally alter offensive operations because it is “not a particularly crucial logistics node”. Russian forces already controlled surrounding access roads, the institute said. They would now have to “manoeuvre” across open terrain in order to link up with units farther north.
All of this argues not only for Israeli strikes—which will surely come—but for vigorous American action as well.
Jesus fucking Christ.
view more: next ›
Are they having a stroke?