this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2024
37 points (77.6% liked)

World News

38714 readers
2676 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] multi_regime_enjoyer@lemmy.ml 3 points 7 hours ago

The current editor of The Atlantic was a Zionist prison guard during the First Intifada. But don't worry, he says his friends describe him as very leftist.

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 29 points 1 day ago (13 children)

All of this argues not only for Israeli strikes—which will surely come—but for vigorous American action as well. Israel may well choose to attack economic targets, and in particular the oil industry that keeps Iran’s economy afloat. Attacks on the nuclear program—buried and dispersed at different sites—would probably be more difficult. In either case, Israel will need American help.

Israel has a large and capable air force, including nearly 40 F-35s. But it lacks a large fleet of aerial refueling planes, necessary for long-range strikes, which the United States has in plenty. At the very least, the United States can quietly help supply that deficit. The question is: Should it do more?

The answer is yes.

Holy fuck this is deranged bloodthirsty shit.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (7 children)

Objective 1: Stay the fuck out of it.

Objective 2: Stay the fuck out of it.

Objective 3: Stay the fuck out of it.

Objective 4: Stay the fuck out of it.

US Government response: "unfortunately we weren't able to achieve any of our stated objectives. We promise we didn't try to at all. The following is unrelated I promise, but Congress is meeting to give Bibi $69420Ungabijillion for self defense and we're sending every troop, drone, and warship we have to Iran."

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

All of this argues not only for Israeli strikes—which will surely come—but for vigorous American action as well.

Jesus fucking Christ.

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 6 points 23 hours ago

The amount of comments in here treating real life like a game of Risk is honestly shocking and upsetting.

What do you all really think you would do differently if you were born in Gaza or Lebanon?

[–] superkret@feddit.org 9 points 1 day ago

This author has big Dr. Strangelove energy.
He can't seem to wait for another big war to start.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

One of the more-hawkish takes I've read.

[–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 day ago

It's Eliot Cohen. That dude has been beating the drum for war with Iran for more than 20 years.

load more comments
view more: next ›