News

I'm sorry, but I find this a bit hilarious. People need a break from that stuff anyway.

My earliest memories of the internet was boobs, and then later a helicopter decapitation.

It's kind of annoying that so many id restrictions focus on porn. Maybe it's not normal for today's kids/teens to come across violent content, compared to people that mightve come across rotten, faces, 4chan, etc. back then.

Don't even act like the SCOTUS upholds the Constitution, they uphold the christian bible now. So unamerican.

it's so shocking that the right-wing's commitment to free speech was entirely performative and predicated on no principle whatsoever

SCOTUS working hard to install Taliban 2.0

We're going to see a lot more of these challenges to SCOTUS precedent in the coming years. The Dobbs decision was them stating loud and clear that they will find any excuse to justify their prefud8ced decisions.

Well, here we go. Hold onto your butts, this shit is going to get wild.

This is why we gotta ban TikTok!!! \s

Seriously tho I can't believe the dummies who buy into this authoritarian garbage.

Noooo haha we we can't fix your real problems that you want us to fix because of how we think some witch hunter in the 1600s relates to the constitution, and politics is just hard and moves slow :(

Anyway, here, we shitcanned the constitution for something pretty much nobody asked for and won't actually fix anything. Enjoy <3

You'd think they don't consider that decisions like this will create more Luigi's, ironically enough from their own base.

You gotta be a really profoundly uncomfortable, nervous human being to think of sex as bad.

What an absolute sign of weakness.

Ain't the point of a right that it's protected from the government?

there's still porn on usenet.

If we're banning content harmful to children why dont we start with Capitalist propoganda and religious indoctrination :3

Notice how we're already asking past the sale with the tacit labeling of "sexual material harmful to minors," with the presupposed declaration that sexual material is automatically harmful to minors.

The all-consuming mission to look at boobies is essentially universal for all pubescent boys from about 12 all the way to the age of majority. This is well known, and none of us came off any the worse despite widespread availability of older brothers' back issues of Hustler, Usenet, dial-up BBS systems, and ultimately the world wide web.

If teens weren't naturally interested in sex where wouldn't been all them teenage pregnancies. Q.E.D.

Kids are gonna start finding porn the old-fashioned way: randomly coming across discarded magazines at the park. That was my first experience.

So we can ban content that is claimed to be harmful to minors but not weapons that actually kill children...

The vague threat of "think of the children maybe being exposed to sexual things" challenging our first amendment right but it becomes some huge debate if a woman is being harassed/stalked/threatened online.

**they are justififying destroying our rights for their feelings **

I'm calling it right now. They use this as first amendment cover for TikTok.

I think Epstein highlighted that there is a much bigger problem going on than some 15 year old looking up “mum gets railed by football team”.

It’s just the first amendment.

Get ready for the slippery slope. Anything conservatives don’t want you to see or read will be placed behind an “identify yourself” firewall.

Define "sexual material." What about the minors who get sexual gratification from Linux installation media repository mirrors?

What's taught in schools: the parents should have a say! Don't let the government decide what to teach our kids!

Books in libraries and content on the internet: the government must step in and make certain content illegal!

Of course, fascists don't care if they're hypocritical. They say whatever gives them the most power in any situation, so calling out hypocrisy won't stop them. It's still good to do, though.