this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2025
543 points (94.6% liked)

News

23880 readers
2324 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kite@sh.itjust.works 104 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Based on my own experience, this is how most cities handle their PD/FD funding, unfortunately. The fire department is just not important.. until it is.

[–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 43 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Can confirm. source: Am Australian.

[–] Sixtyforce@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 week ago

I suspect Scott being a doomsday death cult evangelical made those cuts deliberate instead of just being a standard short sighted git. Especially when he decided to take a vacation during your crises.

That's not really how it works in Australia though.

Every property owner pays an Emergency Services Levy which pays for the fireys. State governments pay for the police force. So there's no organisation that chooses whether police or fire gets whatever money - funding is procured separately.

That said, I take your point that the fireys don't get a lot of attention until there's a disaster. That's just human nature I guess.

In my area, if there's a bushfire that looks like destroying someone's house, the volunteers, fire service, and bombing planes are on to it in minutes.

I don't have "data" but from my anecdotal observations they don't seem to be hamstrung by a lack of funding.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 25 points 1 week ago

That's karma. The longer we seek instant gratification, neglecting doing the hard, dirty necessary work that yields no immediate discernable benefits, the more severe the bite is, when it comes back around and bites us in the backside. As a collective, we stay on the wheel of suffering, figure out we need to do something differently, figure out necessary changes, then implement them... Then a few generations, the wealthy overlords convince us we're spending too much on very sensible investments that yield no immediate discernable benefits and we repeat the cycle. It's like Groundhog Day over centuries (which add up to millennia,), rather than days, weeks, years. Because they plan family fortunes for centuries, rather than days, weeks and years, because they can afford private communities, with private police and fire departments, and comprehensive health. The rest of us are means that justify their ends, and the sooner we, as a collective, wake up and smell the roses and love each other enough (which preserves our own arses) to figure out ways to fix this mess, for centuries that turn into millennia, the better off we and the rest of our ecoweb will be. Or not. 🤷‍♀️

[–] atempuser23@lemmy.world 49 points 1 week ago (5 children)

This is some pure bullshit right here. Never let a tragedy go to waste, gotta get those clicks. No amount of budget would have prepared the city for this. They would have needed literally 10x to contain the fires fast enough.

High winds prevented the use of air based equipment. The same winds drove burning embers for miles into absolutely bone dry foliage.
It's been way to dry here for too long to do any controlled burns, so no way to effectively get rid of the fuel.

The FD could always use more resources, but the extent of this fire has nothing to do with a lack of resources and much more to do with climate change.

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago

I mean, yes, but also fuck the cops and fund the fire department

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The main problem is that the houses are made from wood and cardbord, and are placed in and/or surrounded by dry-as-a-fart forests and brushwork. Which is a stupid idea in an area that is known to regularly hve forest and brushwork fires. More now with global warming, which makes the plants even dryer.

[–] atempuser23@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (8 children)

LA has some some of the most pain in the ass building codes and inspectors. A permit is needed for just about damn everything specifically because of fire risks. Set backs and spacing are strongly enforced as well as the use of fire resistant materials. So even if the house were made of 'cardboard' they are wrapped in concrete siding or stucco.

The winds were 60-80 Miles per hour, blown in from the desert. This is a fire in the center of the city, not some remote urban wild interface.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] badbytes@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You don't understand wildland fire mitigation very much, do you. Every penny helps you troll. And by the way, I have my red card, and a minor in forest fire management.

[–] atempuser23@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Glad to hear from an expert on the situation , as someone who is in fire management there is a lot you can explain.

There are so much about this . What general resources that would have been needed to prevent the scale of the fires? If properly resourced how would the response have been significantly different? Of course each fire fighter counts, but what would the scale need to have been to change this event? What should people be focusing on when we demand better?

For example I heard the the first hours and days of the fires air assets could not be deployed because of the 60-80 mile hour winds. that was cited as a significant factor in the initial spread. though the source was just on the news so no idea how creditable

Are there types of air craft designed to fight fires in tropical storm like conditions?

Are fire like this seen coming by the city FD?

How are resources allocated when multiple fires rage?

In your opinion what cities are doing a good job with fire/disaster planning? What cities globally face similar challenges as Los Angles? Are there lessons than can be learned from those places?

load more comments (2 replies)

Sure but climate change just isn't sexy. "Hey everyone that problem we've been telling everyone about for decades has resulted in the predicted outcome, it's pretty terrible."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] resin85@lemmy.ca 33 points 1 week ago (3 children)

This is incorrect.

the updated budget in November saw a $53 million increase over the previous year once the council took into account the department's unappropriated balance calculation, which provides funds after the budget is approved.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/los-angeles-mayor-karen-bass-pushes-back-criticism/story?id=117512817

[–] ysjet@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

"No they didn't, it was only a budget cut until the unions fought them and forced them to hand over more budget' isn't exactly the win you think it is here.

Even worse, despite call numbers increasing over 5x from 1960, the fire program has been completely unable to expand since 1960 and was basically completely at the mercy of people doing brutal amounts of overtime to keep things going... until they lost the ability to pay them overtime too! The fire department is absurdly understaffed and underfunded. Imagine still making the same salary as 65 years ago, while having to do 5x the work!

While the 53 million budget increase the unions managed to grab is a good improvement, along with the ~200 more trainee firefighters it allowed them to hire but aren't yet ready to deploy, it's the definition of too little and too late.

High winds preventing firefighting planes and copters, low water levels since the city has let nestle steal all of it for free, electrical problems to prevent pumps from sending water from afar, and not enough man hours to manage and prevent fire conditions in the first place- as it says in the article you posted, no amount of budget could have prevented this, because there was more to play here than just the budget. But enough people and man hours to properly manage things would have done a lot to limit the scope of the disaster.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works 32 points 1 week ago (4 children)

From my understanding the water towers had completely ran out of water and pumps couldn't keep up. There's was no issue with volume through the existing water system, there's just no way to contain a fire that big. They should be taking preventative measures such as raking the forest.

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Can't tell if this is idiocy or peak satire.

Well done.

[–] Thteven@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oh it's even better than that. They're referencing a direct quote from trump.

https://youtu.be/7CGQv8IDAWw

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I was aware of that, but thank you for providing context!

[–] RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com 9 points 1 week ago

I was not. Sounded reasonable except the raking part, from someone who knows fuck all about forest fires or building in fire prone areas.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 week ago

Meh, same thing with healthcare. Who needs a medical professional to help a person with a mental health crisis when you can have a guy with highschool and six months of "training" put a few bullets in em?

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 1 week ago

America: Funding cops to shoot black people, defunding actual helpful social needs since 1864.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

At least a bunch of rich fucks in Malibu and Pacific Palisades are paying the price for it.

Doesn't help the lungs and bronchial passages of people with asthma and other breathing issues though. A lot of people will die who were nowhere near the fires.

[–] atempuser23@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The rich fucks are insured. The old timers living there before prices blew up will be fucked.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Apparently not insured enough to not be fretting about it.

[–] skhayfa@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

LAPD cops can shout and order the fires to freeze!

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

They could also shoot it if it does not obey!

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago
[–] ATDA@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

I have to do other people's jobs. Slap some tin foil on em and throw them in to help.

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

Maybe if they all shoot the fire in the back when it's sleeping?!

[–] Crikeste@lemm.ee 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

They cut ~2% of the budget. Anyone spewing this funding cut bullshit is a partisan hack.

Quit being reactionary.

[–] xor@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

that’s not what reactionary means

$17.5 million, or around 2 percent of the previous year’s budget of $837 million. It was the second-largest departmental operating cut to come out of the city’s 2024-25 fiscal year budget, which shaved funding from the majority of city departments — but not the police.

the article does say the percentage… and maybe it’s insane to cut their budget at all, given california’s recent fire problems, and they should’ve increased it by about 100%….
so, given the difference between -2% and +100%, and half the city burning down, it’s a pretty big deal.

[–] quicklime@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

it's not even remotely close to half of the city burning down. But given the damage estimates are running somewhere around $150 billion, it's bad enough

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why do you think it's okay to cut funding to the fire department while keeping the police(gang) force that is notorious for not actually doing anything to help it's citizens?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 7 points 1 week ago

I suspect they could have doubled the budget and they still wouldn't be able to control those fires.

Still it looks like it's affecting rich people, so something will probably get done about it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] randon31415@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Just give firefighting responsibility to the cops! Then they can show up to your kitchen fire, put it out, shoot your dog, and arrest you for complaining all in one trip!

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 6 points 1 week ago

Given the history of wildfires in California, someone has anti-survival traits.

[–] badbytes@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Fire is a natural part of the ecological system. You can by time, but eventually, it will happen. Building in wildlands is a recipe for disaster, if you don't create breaks, or defencable zones. It's not a simple problem, with a simple solution. A big part of the problem, is building all those homes there, but if you're gonna build, then you should protect. A lot of people build in forested areas and don't create defensible zones, because, that's why they move there, for pretty trees.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›