this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2025
60 points (92.9% liked)

Asklemmy

44734 readers
825 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I mean in terms of percentages.

And I don't necessarily mean three full terms. 2.5 terms or 2.1 terms or anything nontrivially more than 2 (like, 10 minutes more doesn't count) would qualify.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml 68 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

Almost zero, but not because I believe in American democracy. I think the techno-fascist machine will grind forward regardless of Trump being in office.

[–] compostgoblin@slrpnk.net 22 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Exactly. If it wasn’t clear in 2016, it certainly is now - Trump is a symptom, not the root problem

[–] weeeeum@lemmy.world 9 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Democrats are practically shoving the voting base towards trump. Their whole selling point is "saving the system that's starving you".

Trump promised to destroy it, and destroy it he will. Not for us of course.

Same thing happened in 1930s Germany. Nornal parties were just gonna keep things going, while people had to use wheelbarrows of cash to buy a loaf and Hitler promised to destroy it all and make Germany the greatest its ever been.

[–] LyingCake@feddit.org 5 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

You might believe that the following facts are besides your point, but I still want to get this straight:

  • Hyperinflation in the Weimar Republic reached its peak in 1923
  • the NSDAP (the nazi party) got only 2% of the vote in the 1928 elections
  • Hitler rose to power in 1933, after getting over 40% of the vote.

Note that there were 4 national elections between 1930 and 1933. The Weimar Republic was about as stable politically as a house of cards on a trampoline.

It's still true that part of the success of Hitler's party was due to former non-voters losing fate in the established parties, especially in regards to economic policy, but it is not as direct of a connection as your comment makes it out to be.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 14 points 4 weeks ago

Ya i think people still aren’t seeing that the Billionaire class is why he won. He isn’t pulling the strings he is just the puppet.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 7 points 4 weeks ago

Exactly, a relevant passage from This Soviet World by Anna Louise Strong

[–] smuuthbrane@sh.itjust.works 50 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

In other words, you are asking whether Trump will find a way, legally or otherwise, to invalidate the POTUS term limit?

I agree he'll certainly try, but unless things turn really poorly over the next four years, I'd say his chances of doing so are really, infinitesimally low.

And I will further predict that the closer he gets to doing so, the higher the risk that he'll be a further assassination target.

[–] themurphy@lemmy.ml 17 points 4 weeks ago

The man is old af. 8 years is too long either way.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PonyOfWar@pawb.social 33 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

I'd say like 20%. Not unlikely he'll try but there will be pushback. Also his age and health or an assassin might well get to him first. He might try going for a family dynasty instead, with Donald Jr following him.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 26 points 4 weeks ago (4 children)

or an assassin

I'm absolutely convinced, between the previous attempts and every single legal issue of any consequence, that he literally is "Teflon Don."

If an assassin actually gets a clear shot, it will somehow bounce off and kill whoever is actually running against Trump. That's the timeline we live in. The joke one.

[–] NineMileTower@lemmy.world 14 points 4 weeks ago

That already happened except the victim was his supporter.

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 8 points 4 weeks ago

He’s been using that experimental DoD bulletproof spray tan

[–] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 weeks ago

Good thing luck isn't genetic (at least I think so)

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago

New Trump conspiracy just dropped:

It turns out Trump actually does have a superpower. He can Groundhog Day himself at will. He can create a save state of reality and load it at will. Or he can set up time loop of up to say, 6 months in length. He won the election because he literally ran that campaign hundreds, perhaps thousands or tens thouands of times before finally getting it right. He's save scumming reality. Though, this is also the reason he talks so oddly and is all screwed up. Thousands of subjective years giving political speeches just fries your brain.

[–] Manifish_Destiny@lemmy.world 6 points 4 weeks ago

Donald jr following him.

Id rather kill myself right now than live in that reality.

[–] Makeshift@sh.itjust.works 27 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

After all we just witnessed?

Four years stalling courts and avoiding punishment for insurrection, theft of classified documents, etc.

Getting legal permission to break any law he pleases.

Convincing even democrats that tge constitution, specifically the Fourteenth amendment, means nothing and isn’t worth acting on.

Openly planning the worst possible cabinet.

Not having any investigation or action on votes from targeted minorities get Jim Crow’d away.

No recounts when suspicious vote trends are spotted.

Survival of an assassination attempt.

… Yeah I’m going high. 70% chance minumum if he wants to. He could just order a public hit on the next in line as a presidential act. Clearly no one will stop him.

There should not BE a timeline where he succeeded the second time. The fact that there is implies he can do literally anything he wants.

[–] CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml 6 points 4 weeks ago

I suspect he won't do another two full terms, but not because of any inherent virtue in the system. I think it'll just come down to biology. He's 78, not in good health anyway and about to enter a very high-stress job. If he's still going at 86 I'll be surprised.

And that's assuming the cabal of demented fascists he's assembled around him don't tear him apart the second he shows any sign of weakness or of no longer being useful to them, which they definitely will.

[–] jimmy90@lemmy.world 4 points 4 weeks ago

i agree - he can change any law he wants

[–] HexadecimalSky@lemmy.world 20 points 4 weeks ago

1% or less.

  1. They probably wont nullify the 2 term limit, can't easily go back and after trump, will there be a democrat monarch?

  2. He wants fame and wealth, he will burn everything to get it. In this term he will burn the most of the bridges with his backers.

  3. His actions will accelerate the victory or death of his backers. Either his backers wont need him or cant back him, so he probably will get waning support.

  4. He may not live until the end of his term, let alone a third.

  5. He is too prideful, he wont bow to being a VP and will pull something that will sabotage the president on ticket.

  6. U.S.A. or the world may be destroyed in the next 5 or so years.

  7. He will try at least 1 coup this term, i'd be suprised if it wasn't more. He will fail and/or drag the nation to civil war in the process. He doesn't have the backing of the army and not all states are under him

For any of these reasons or a combination therof, makes him serving a third term highly, highly unlikely.

[–] Zak@lemmy.world 18 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (2 children)

10%.

  • Chance he runs for vice president and wins, with the presidential candidate resigning promptly: 5%
  • Chance he cancels or significantly delays election: 3%
  • Chance he successfully refuses to leave office after election using force: 2%

Here are all the ways that doesn't happen:

  • Chance he dies of natural causes: 70% - it's about one in three per year for a man in his early 80s, which would give us 1-0.66^4 = 81% for four years, but he has access to the best possible medical care
  • Chance he runs for vice president and wins, with the presidential candidate promising to resign promptly, and is betrayed: 10%
  • Chance he attempts to cancel or delay the election and fails: 10%
  • Chance he refuses to leave office after election and is removed: 10%

These things have a less than 1% chance:

  • Constitutional amendment
  • Supreme court allows him to run for a third term in violation of the unambiguous text of the constitution
[–] Shdwdrgn@mander.xyz 9 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Chance he cancels or significantly delays election: 3%

The bird flu is starting to look like it could be a serious threat. Given that he already attempted an insurrection once, I wouldn't put it past him to intentionally turn it into another pandemic, then generously decide that this time he's going to take it seriously and lock everything down in 2028 (while simultaneously banning all states from using mail-in ballots).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 8 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Chance he runs for vice president and wins, with the presidential candidate promising to resign promptly, and is betrayed: 10%

For this one, it also depends on how the Supreme Court rules on the 12th amendment. That amendment states that anyone who is unqualified to be president is likewise unqualified to be vice president, but there is some uncertainty as to whether or not it only applies to people unqualified to be president or if it includes people unqualified to run as president.

I'd say 90% chance the conservative-stacked Supreme Court side with Trump because the conservative justices are originalists and the 12th's interaction with the 22nd was not intended when the 12th was written, but 10% chance they decide he's unqualified to be Vice President so as to keep the door closed for Dems who might try the same thing.

[–] Zak@lemmy.world 6 points 4 weeks ago

It's the wording of the 22nd amendment that makes this a possible outcome (emphasis added):

No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice

It could have said "no person shall serve as president for more than two terms" or similar wording, but it does not. I agree with you that conservative justices are likely to use this interpretation.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 17 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)
  1. They're going to install Vance the moment they think they can.
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] collapse_already@lemmy.ml 14 points 4 weeks ago

Trump changes constitution to allow himself additional terms. Monkey paw curls. Obama term 3 confirmed.

I'm kind of hoping Trump kicks the bucket before the end of this term. Keep feeding him hamberders.

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 9 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

zero. it would require 2/3rds of the senate and that will not happen. they barely have the house.

[–] Glasgow@lemmy.ml 13 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

If they want to do it by the book. Could just say the election is postponed due to martial law and the invasion from Mexico or Canada or whoever really it doesn’t seem to matter.

High chance he dies or goes full dementia in the next four years though. If he were 50 the chances of him stealing another term would be a lot higher. Prob just rig it more than it already is so they can’t lose and pick his successor.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 5 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Martial law does not prevent our elections from happening. That's not "by the book".

US has been at war most of its existence. That's never prevented an election from occurring

[–] Glasgow@lemmy.ml 7 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

Changing the amendment would be by the book. I’m saying they can just do anyway and tie it up in the courts that they control. And he has congress so he could whip up a frenzy and postpone the date indefinitely. If he’s still alive and has the threat of court cases restarting and new ones for whatever he gets up to this term you’ll need to literally drag him out he’ll have nothing to lose.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 3 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

None of that is by the book. There's no mechanism that lets the president stay in power by "tying things up in court". Any attempt to do what you describe is just a coup.

And there's zero chance that amendment gets passed. We can barely get a simple 50% majority for the budget passed.

[–] Glasgow@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 weeks ago

Sir I’m saying doing it properly through changing the amendment is by the books and NOT what they’ll do. They’ll do a coup again.

[–] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 7 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Zero.

He has moderate dementia, and will be replaced by JD Vance before the end of his term.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] swordgeek@lemmy.ca 7 points 4 weeks ago

If he lives to the end of this term, 100% that he'll try for a third.

By then, it'll be a battle between Republican Nazis who back him blindly, and Republican Nazis who want a more competent puppet in power. Oh, and people who aren't actively supporting fascism. I doubt they'll make a difference.

[–] Jackthelad@lemmy.world 7 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)
  1. The scaremongering about this is hysterical.

You've got four more years of the orange clown and then he'll finally fuck off.

[–] adhocfungus@midwest.social 3 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I admire your optimism. It would take a constitutional amendment, which I don't think he would have any issues getting past the GOP Congress. After that it's less likely, but still possible with his shenanigans. I think the only reason it wouldn't happen is he croaks first.

[–] rockman057@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

But a constitutional amendment requires a two thirds vote in congress. It’s an even higher bar to clear than the filibuster. There aren’t enough republican seats to do it on their own. It would have to have bipartisan support.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 6 points 4 weeks ago

About 50/50. SCOTUS has already ruled that the 3rd section of the 14th amendment to the US constitution doesn't mean what it plainly says, so there's no real hope that they'd uphold the 22nd.

The only reason I place it that low is because he's ripe for a fatal heart attack or stroke.

[–] mo_lave@reddthat.com 6 points 4 weeks ago

5%. Pray this timeline does not roll a 5 or less in a d100

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 5 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

1 percent. There's too much they would need to do in four years to not have an election and elections are done by the states not the federal government. So there will definitely be an election. As far as getting re-elected it would take draconian measures for the exact same reason. He'd need 270 electoral votes worth of states to blatantly go against the Constitution.

The only way he remains in office past January 20th 2029 is by refusing to leave and surrounding himself with loyalists. Thus the 1 percent chance. It could work if a million things go exactly right.

[–] Noodle07@lemmy.world 4 points 4 weeks ago

And him not dying before then too

[–] swordgeek@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 weeks ago

A more interesting question to me would be "What are the chances that the 2028 elections are allowes to be carried out freely (e.g. without the governing powers forcing the outcome they want)?

[–] nothacking@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

1/3

He's already shown he's willing to interfere with and straight up ignore the results of an electron. He's also willing to use the army as his personal goon squad, and has has support from the other branches. He's also perfectly capable of spinning a narrative that the election was "stolen"

On the other hand, properly executing a coup is hard, and also old: It's entirely possible he dies in office. (of natural causes or otherwise)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] psmgx@lemmy.world 4 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Greater than 50%, mostly due to the complete spinlessness of the greater USian population. People used to riot for less, and often.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 4 points 4 weeks ago

That depends on two things.

Will he live that long?

Will the people who own him let him have it?

[–] TORFdot0@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago

It can’t happen without some major fuckening from the Supreme Court which would absolutely end it’s legitimacy and would probably end in standoffs between US Marshalls and blue state courts and federal courts in liberal circuits as they just completely ignore the Supreme Court going forward.

The text of the 22nd amendment couldn’t be interpreted any other way except as written: “No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once.”

[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 4 weeks ago

50/50. It really depends on the midterms imo, assuming we have fair midterms

[–] untorquer@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

1/3 normal election with new candidate 1/3 trump dies for whatever reason, probably choking on taco bell 1/3 fascist takeover (though the term "president" may not apply, and it may not be him running things). I think enough dems would flip if threatened with terrorism charges for normal politics being interpreted as protest or whatever other laws originally made in reaction to far right acts of terror.

So imo, 50%, mostly because we have 4 years of extremely uncertain change that can occur.

[–] Noodle07@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago

Imagine maga nuts storming McDonald's because trump died on a bigmac

load more comments
view more: next ›