this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2025
214 points (93.1% liked)

News

23880 readers
2316 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

A new study from Rutgers University's Network Contagion Research Institute claims TikTok's algorithm limits anti-Chinese Communist Party (CCP) content compared to platforms like Instagram and YouTube, despite higher user engagement with such posts.

The study also suggests TikTok users express more favorable views of China after prolonged use.

TikTok criticized the findings as flawed due to the use of simulated accounts.

The study precedes a Supreme Court hearing on whether the U.S. can ban TikTok, amid national security concerns tied to its Chinese ownership and potential CCP influence.

all 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] toomanypancakes@lemmy.world 38 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Exactly, you should only use platforms that are vehicles for good old US of A propaganda. The ruling class surely has your best interests in mind, let them control the information you can access!

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

it's odd that they defined chinese propaganda as being less anti-chinese compared to american social media platforms.

[–] Grapho@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

As long as Americans stay so rabidly sinophobic, that might as well be the actual definition.

[–] Fades@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why are you so desperate to continue to receive Chinese propaganda? TikTok ain’t shit, it’s a 10 second video hosting service.

Yes we are exposed to plenty of American propaganda so why fight to keep Chinese propaganda in the mix?

The ruling class doesn’t have our best interests in mind, but the CCP does?

[–] leftytighty@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 week ago

It's not a compelling argument but there's an argument to be made that even just having more propaganda sources in the mix (as opposed to only American propaganda) is healthier than not.

Homogenizing and normalizing only American propaganda globally is kinda the status quo

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 33 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's not a social media website

No, but it certainly is propaganda.

[–] extremeboredom@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago

.... Duh? This has been obvious from the beginning.

[–] yogurt@lemm.ee 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Their definition of "anti-Chinese Communist Party (CCP) content" is dialed way up into treating "China will fall in 7 days" like good content and anything less than that is Chinese propaganda. If they search for Tienanmen Square and get "pictures of the square without mention of the massacre" they classify that as "pro-CCP". If they get "unbiased historical content" or news coverage about bad shit China does they call that "neutral".

They also don't do anything to compensate for Tiktok's overall censorship, they went looking for massacre and genocide on the platform where people say corn and unalive, they don't compare how Tiktok deals with China vs any other subject.

They did a survey of how pro-China people are and how much they use Tiktok, but don't do anything to adjust for Tiktok being publicly associated with China. They could've put a question in the survey about whether people were boycotting Tiktok for anti-CCP reasons but didn't, which looks like they were fishing for a result.

I remember NCRI from back when they did the study comparing Antifa to ISIS, and they're still doing weird shit like that, if you like Luigi you're "Killing with Applause", colleges being too woke and anti-genocide is the "Corruption of the American Mind", if you do DEI it's your fault white people are racist.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If only there was some kind of corporate legal reporting requirements for moderation and algorithms.

Well lets just ban foreign owned media, problem solved.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago

The worst part is that Tiktok was going to enter into an agreement do exactly that before they said ban or nothing. It would have been a great test that could eventually be applied to all social media comoanies.

[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

when 99.99% likely is just likely

[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

There is minimal content I see that is at all related to China. The fact of the matter is the government wants to keep the public stupid and under informed. Tik tok is a great way to get information out and they hate it. Yes it is dangerous but no one cares about X or Facebook. They are far worse imo.

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah with how much X and Facebook have just been mouthpieces of Russian disinformation it’s funny how much focus is being placed on tiktok

[–] Makhno@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Tiktok isn't the right misinformation

[–] Shawdow194@fedia.io 3 points 1 week ago

Its more than the CCP related content that helps China

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Well consider me surprised.

Or not.

Yeah probably the opposite of surprised.

[–] distantsounds@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

It’s always about control

[–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 5 points 1 week ago

Also water is wet

[–] khaleer@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 week ago

No way, who would foreseen this?!

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Huh. So is Douyin. I guess they're not so different after all.

[–] Fades@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Except Douyin limits the amount of hours per day a person can consume and limits the content to positive and educational content that has clear benefits vs the brain rot that is the majority of TikTok in comparison.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

"It pumps you full of propaganda, but there's a time limit" is not the defense you think it is.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 1 points 1 week ago

Can’t just have a foreign agency assert malign influence over their country without unfettered bribery.

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 week ago (4 children)

What we really need is for everything to be American/western propaganda. Can't possibly have anything else.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 week ago

How about no propaganda?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Why does it have to be one or the other?

[–] Fades@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

We are exposed to American propaganda so why fight to also be exposed to Chinese propaganda too? It’s not like TikTok creates special content or does anything special at all.

You clearly don’t like propaganda and for good reason, you recognize your own state’s propaganda as bad yet you want to keep a foreign state’s propaganda?

[–] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I checked your search history to see if you fit the obvious stereotype, and I was disappointed but not surprised.

"Ah yes, they think China propaganda bad. Thus, they must think w e s t e r n propaganda good. Now I will skewer them with my wit."

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 week ago

I feel like my post history is pretty normal but I suppose I'm biased lol