If it will go in someone's body, it should be completely opensource, from hardware to software.
this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2024
212 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
37635 readers
205 users here now
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
While I don’t disagree with the sentiment, exo means outside.
True, I had another comment on mind when I wrote it. Someone talking about brain implants. But that's also valid in this case.
Companies should publish schematics, drawings, 3d files etc when they mark a product obsolete.
Don't forget to unlock the bootloader on products that have an operating system, so that people can also flash a replacement for it. So many Ipads and Iphones being wasted now.
Glad that he eventually got it fixed.
Fortunately, Lifeward eventually capitulated and Straight was able to get his exoskeleton repaired — but that was only after an intense campaign
Still, these are the issues that make me question why anyone is excited for products like brain implants. The longer we can go without commercialised body modifications, the better.
To me, it's why Right to Repair laws are incredibly necessary. Repair parts, manuals, everything needed to operate and maintain a sold product should be mandated as "must be available to buy from the patent-holder, or the patent expires and the part is legal for anyone to manufacture".
Shit like this is why we need strong regulations for anything that is a medical device that is depended on by people. I don't give a shit if it isn't profitable anymore, these companies need to support their customers that may be significantly impacted if their devices don't work.
Every two years, 99% of voters here in the US choose to put their stamp of approval on capitalism. Then they inexplicably clutch their pearls when capitalists do capitalist things, as if it's somehow shocking.
Looks like public pressure brought a positive outcome in this case, so that's something, but this is the stuff you should consider when voting for the two ruling parties.
You are that guy in the comic about a modern person blaming serfs for the persistence of feudalism.
Thank you for your response.
Voting doesn't equal approval.
Yes, it does. We may not like to consider that, but it's the truth.
Disagreeing with politics is as old as humans, one can live in a situation one doesn't philosophically agree with. Voting does hold aspiration.
That it does.
We still have to look at historical patterns and acknowledge that what a person claims to vote for is antithetical to what their party of choice is actually going to do.
Do you have a source for that?
Hey, look at that. It's the inevitable consequence of the game theory of first past the post voting. Voting system reform is my #1 issue, and if you actually care about the fact that "99% of voters" are locked into voting for someone they dislike to avert disaster every 4 years, it should be yours as well.
There is no meaningful future for third parties until and unless this occurs. IRV is a good first step, but Score voting is better. Multimember districts are also important. Getting rid of the electoral college is a no-brainer.
Thank you for your perspective.
Voting system reform is my #1 issue
Respectfully, I don't think it is. You've seen the same history I have and, whether you want to acknowledge it or not, you know how your Democratic vote reinforces that which you say you want to change.
If only there were other things that a person could do outside of voting once every four years to participate in the political process.
Agreed.
If only.
Requires a constitutional amendment, which, in case it isn't obvious, will not happen, as it will require the yea votes of states that currently wield outsized power under the current system.
Push for it in your state, first. We're still in the first few cycles using RCV in Maine (I like STAR better) where folks are learning to love it, but there's no time like now to get that ball rolling. More people need to experience it to shift the national conversation of "whether we should" to "which should we use"
While agree with the sentiment, electorialism will never end capitalism because of the power imbalance where capitalists will spend all their money if they need to for heavy propaganda campaigns in favour of capitalism.
Your energy is better spent on small scale organising your workplace, to make sure that you and your coworkers can actually use the only leverage you have through strikes.
Absolutely right. The only power we have now is local.
I've been voting for a while and never have I seen a candidate on the ballot who was against capitalism.
US voters are never given the chance to vote for non-capitalist candidates. But this year we actually have a socialist in the running which is why I am voting for Claudia de la Cruz this year.
In a two-party system, you're throwing away your vote that could get Harris instead of Trump elected for not even a blip on the radar. This is at best pointless grandstanding.
Edit: Decided to read a little into her. She's nothing but a spoiler candidate, meant to syphon voters away from Harris, just like Stein. Cherry on top: Apologia for China and North Korea and funding from China, which alone should motivate any decent human being to avoid her like the plague: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claudia_De_la_Cruz_2024_presidential_campaign#Criticism
How exactly are you not throwing your vote away voting Harris or Trump, in full knowledge that neither is going to do anything meaningful to help the poor and working class?
Are you seriously trying to promote a false equivalency narrative?
I'm asking a legitimate question here.
We can look back at the last 40 years, but the last 20 in particular, when Democrats were handed a mandate not once but twice.
And they've used that power to make us poorer, not wealthier.
So how exactly are you not throwing your vote away voting Harris or Trump, given that we can look at recent history and infer exactly what they're going to do once elected?
I could vote Harris, but my eighty year-old parents are still going to have to drive for DoorDash, in the car I lent them, and if they can't Harris or Trump will gladly allow their monied friends to take everything away from them. You and I both know it, so all of the discussion about 'throwing your vote away' just rings very hollow to me. My vote is already worthless, at least as concerns the Federal Government.
OK, I'll bite.
Trump will be worse for marginalized people, trans folks in particular. Harris has a history of supporting LGBTQIA+ rights.
Trump will be worse for Palestine (and has said as much). Harris has at least entertained a cease fire.
Trump, despite the lies that he utters, will make every move to implement Project 2025, which will destroy any semblance of democracy. Harris won't do that.
I am so sick of the bosthsideism bullshit. Just because they are both bad, does not mean one isn't dramatically worse. This election is going to be close, and as shitty as it is, the US is a 2 party system. Third parties do not have a chance with the current electoral system.
If you want that to change, you have start local and work up the chain. Not voting or voting third party is pointless until there is a change in system, and that starts locally.
If you want that to change, you have start local
You're partly right.
The only power we have now is local, unless you're a billionaire or willing to commit a terrorist act, both of which do not apply to me. You can always do good with your own two hands, but we can look at the last two decades and conclude correctly and definitively that voting for either major party is throwing your vote away, at least if you're a wage earner.
The thing is, fascism's already here for most. Abortion is criminalized in part of the country and will soon be criminalized in most of it, and it happened with Democrats in power. A vast majority of Americans have to work 2-3 jobs to survive now, and it happened while Democrats were in charge. If you have a major injury or illness, you will be bankrupted, and that remains true no matter who we elect. If you're a person of color, a police officer can kill you at will and there won't be any meaningful blowback to the police system, and not only did it happen under Democrats, Joe Biden mocked the defund movement in a SOTU speech.
It seems most people want to give credit to Democrats for what they say. I'm giving them credit for what they actually do.
If you don't think those things will get substantially worse, and substantially faster under Trump, the you have played yourself
Does it not bother you that they all happened and got worse under Democrats?
Of course it does. Where did I ever imply it didn't? But just because the dems suck, doesn't mean the GOP isn't far worse, especially the Trump flavor. There are states I can be legally sterilized because I have an X as my gender marker on my ID. That's the kind of shit the trumpers want to do federally. At least with Harris there is a chance for the people to pressure her to do the right thing. With trump that is impossible
I respect your right to vote as you choose.
What do you suggest people do then? Protest the vote and take to the streets? Not asking to be a dick, just genuinely curious.
Vote third party and be public about it.
Protests are a waste, so taking to the streets doesn't matter much unless you can gather enough people to create a legitimate violent threat.
Work inside all of the political institutions to bring about constitutional change. Abolish electoral college etc.
According to the dictionary the company is lying.
"No longer useful" according the company, as it doesn't make them money anymore.
I guess we will see if "there's no such things as bad publicity" works out for them.
I certainly don’t agree with the company’s position, but did you read definition 1b? I think you may have stopped reading a little early
I tripple checked before posting. 1b describes technological fashion.
Leg prothesis are not out of fashion for people who need them.
There is no alternative clearly superior v2 product that i could find either.
Reminder that I don’t like the company’s stance on the matter.
What you have posted is your interpretation of the definition, which has little legal or practical value. A product does not need a successor, superior or otherwise, to become obsolete. Nothing you have posted has any relation to the definition of obsolete, and are mostly word play.
That being said, right to repair needs to become a real thing and companies should be supplying repair manuals for items they consider obsolete.
All i did was a websearch for "Obsolete dictionary meaning"
Its the interpretation of www.merriam-webster.com which in its own words is "an Encyclopaedia Britannica company, America's leading provider of language information for more than 180 years."
I get that language is semantics, i use a lot of creative liberties with language all the time but i still think that "Not longer enough profit potential" is not covered under the term "Obsolete" You could argue some doubt but its a cold-hearted business, they don't get the benefit of doubt. Also my expression doesn't really need legal or practical value. I am glad to have said what i did.
Ridiculous, but depressingly unsurprising.