Gaywallet

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] Gaywallet@beehaw.org 3 points 14 hours ago

If you wish to discuss the controversy, feel free to make a post or link to an article. I'm personally not interested in hosting a link to these weirdos.

[–] Gaywallet@beehaw.org 11 points 3 days ago

I find NFC stickers often require an annoyingly close connection (unless it's a rather large antenna) and can be particularly finicky with certain cases and other attachments people put on phones. Realistically they both take approximately the same amount of time and it's way cheaper to print a tag than it is to buy a single NFC sticker

[–] Gaywallet@beehaw.org 5 points 3 days ago

You're welcome to have your own beliefs.

You are not, however, welcome to use those beliefs to invalidate someone else's lived experience.

[–] Gaywallet@beehaw.org 23 points 3 days ago (2 children)

My fav application is scanning with a phone to immediately get on wifi

[–] Gaywallet@beehaw.org 1 points 3 days ago

Started and finished 1000xResist over the course of a few days. In general I often find myself turned off by games with aging graphics, not for any good reason but more that I just find less of a pull towards them. I have more trouble being engaged or immersed, unless there's a really strong art focus. This is one such game that I was worried I wouldn't get pulled into, and in fact one that sat on a list of "maybe I'll pick it up" because it was so highly reviewed but I was worried about that facet. It did not take very long for the game to grip me, however, because of it's excellent storytelling. In fact, the game is almost entirely about storytelling, so there's not a ton that I can share other than to say that it deals with a lot of difficult themes like intense trauma, bullying, having a tough childhood, extreme ideologies, and the long term effects of violence. It also deals with more societal and human issues like protests, fascism, extreme duress, how self-interested and powerful individuals can cause serious problems and inflict violence, being optimistic or nihilistic in the face of overwhelming odds, and the threat of extinction.

While it isn't a very long game, consisting of maybe a dozen hours of gameplay, I found myself putting it down for a while after certain chapters in order to process what just happened. The story throws a lot of curveballs and reveals information that can easily change the way you frame entire chapters of the story from earlier, but it never feels like it's done in a way that inspires whiplash - nothing ever feels like a 'sudden' realization and I'm honestly not sure how much of it can be attributed to such a difficult story (if everything is fucked, what's one more thing?) and how much is because they do a masterful job at slowly unraveling the enigma of the story that very few pieces of information ever really feel out of place. There's unfortunately only so much I can write without spoiling the story, but I will say that it was one of the best stories I've heard or played through and I'd thoroughly recommend it to anyone who likes a good story or wants to explore the themes I've mentioned above. Also, if anyone else out there played through this, I'd love to hear your thoughts on the story... what did you think? Do you have any lingering questions left over? Were there parts of the story that irked you or that you found particularly moving?

[–] Gaywallet@beehaw.org 13 points 4 days ago

I didn't expect much moderation from variety but dang

[–] Gaywallet@beehaw.org 2 points 1 week ago

It is specifically targeted at folks who are not purely a binary gender (arguably by definition not cis, but I'm not going to enforce labels on anyone). Their preface/definition can be found below:


Who can take part?

The gender binary is a societal model that classifies all humans into one of two categories:

Woman/girl – always, solely and completely
Man/boy – always, solely and completely

If you feel like that doesn’t fit your experience of yourself and your own gender in some way, you are invited to participate. This includes, but is definitely not limited to:

people whose genders change over time
people whose genders fluctuate in intensity
people who experience more than one gender at a time
people who don’t experience gender at all
people whose gender is neither male/man nor female/woman

We also welcome anyone who:

rejects gender altogether
feels like they’re outside of gender
feels like they transcend or move beyond gender or the gender binary
doesn’t really understand gender as it applies to them
is questioning whether their flavour of trans might be binary or nonbinary

It’s completely up to you whether you feel you fit any of these. This survey leans on the side of inclusive.

[–] Gaywallet@beehaw.org 5 points 1 week ago

Love watching this each year. Shout out to the kiddos for reclaiming slurs

[–] Gaywallet@beehaw.org 3 points 1 week ago

I suppose to wrap up my whole message in one closing statement : people who deny systematic inequality are braindead and for whatever reason, they were on my mind while reading this article.

In my mind, this is the whole purpose of regulation. A strong governing body can put in restrictions to ensure people follow the relevant standards. Environmental protection agencies, for example, help ensure that people who understand waste are involved in corporate production processes. Regulation around AI implementation and transparency could enforce that people think about these or that it at the very least goes through a proper review process. Think international review boards for academic studies, but applied to the implementation or design of AI.

I’ll be curious what they find out about removing these biases, how do we even define a racist-less model? We have nothing to compare it to

AI ethics is a field which very much exists- there are plenty of ways to measure and define how racist or biased a model is. The comparison groups are typically other demographics.... such as in this article, where they compare AAE to standard English.

[–] Gaywallet@beehaw.org 14 points 1 week ago (5 children)

While it may be obvious to you, most people don't have the data literacy to understand this, let alone use this information to decide where it can/should be implemented and how to counteract the baked in bias. Unfortunately, as is mentioned in the article, people believe the problem is going away when it is not.

[–] Gaywallet@beehaw.org 2 points 1 week ago

Thank you for engaging 💜

[–] Gaywallet@beehaw.org 33 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Just because there's no ethical consumption under capitalism doesn't mean that we have zero control over what we consume. It's perfectly fine to hold a viewpoint of trying to minimize harm where you can and when you're aware of it. Where you draw your lines doesn't have to be perfect either (after all, we're human).

view more: next ›