Yikes. Someone makes a gender based overgeneralization when overwhelming evidence (look at crime stats) proves it incorrect, and those that dare to defend that group get attacked.

Bigotry is bigotry. If you hate a group purely based on their superficial membership, then you are bigoted.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/bigot#%3A%7E%3Atext=noun%2Cgroup)%20with%20hatred%20and%20intolerance

The strongest argument you have is when you compare violence perpetrated by gender. But even then, that doesn't support your argument that all men are evil in some way. And at such low numbers, it's disingenuous deflection b/c even the two summed up don't account for even 1% of the population. Sad that so many of you have brain rot.

[–] _lunar@lemmy.ml 3 points 46 minutes ago (1 children)

does the post say "all men are murderers"? no, it doesn't. it is however true that a disproportionate amount of men are murderers, especially compared to women, the number of whom that are murderers of men or other women are so statistically low compared to men that it isn't even worthy of consideration.

men, generally, are far more likely to commit acts of violence than women. and the number of men who do, while not the majority, is high enough for women to be afraid of men in general.

under our existing patriarchal social conditions, men are murderers. they're more inclined to violence and present a higher risk than women. saying "men are murderers" doesn't mean "all men including you are murderers" it simply means that the threat is near entirely comprised of men. you should also be aware that we also don't think that this is inherent to being a man but a manifestation of social conditioning under patriarchy that encourages such behavior in men.

[–] houstoneulers@lemmy.world -1 points 39 minutes ago (1 children)

lol, i literally point out how your retort is flawed, and you bull head through it anyways.

What's funny but somehow escapes the terminal basement dwellers is that the majority of productive women do not worry about this b/c they understand how stats work. But bigots are never smart enough to even understand basic stats.

[–] _lunar@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 minutes ago* (last edited 1 minute ago) (1 children)

you didn't cite any actual statistics, meanwhile throughout this thread people have been citing stats that prove you wrong. violent crime between men and women is not equal, and women are disproportionately victimized by it and men disproportionately cause it.

and yes, i'm fully aware these statistics compare violence by gender. no one is saying that because the majority of violent crime is committed by men, that the majority of men are violent criminals. you're being obtuse and missing the point on purpose.

with that said, the number of women in total affected by violence, sexual violence especially is indeed high anyway. even if it isn't all men, it happens enough that all women have to live in fear.

[–] houstoneulers@lemmy.world 1 points 2 minutes ago

It's not hard to find how low the crime stats are. FBI posts them yearly. It's called google.

Obv you don't get how to make a statistical argument if you bull headedly stuck with it. In the end, while you're busy preoccupied by the gender distraction, a good amount of us are furthering the real divide, class. And well, while you're still repeating your tired, pointless arguments, productive people (men and women) are leaving you behind...happily.

Simply put, you can't say "too bad men are murderers tho" or any other derivative when you use a stat that doesn't actually support that argument. But again, bigots aren't the smartest lot.

Have a nice night.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (2 children)

Woman: "I and every woman I know have had some really bad experiences with men"

This dude: "Actually, you've had bad experiences with a small minority of men. Why do you hate all men?"

[–] GaMEChld@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 45 minutes ago)

And of course your common sense take is getting downvoted. (Edit was -2 when I posted). They should get the bears to protect them.

[–] houstoneulers@lemmy.world 0 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Lol pretty much. Bigotry is bigotry. You've got no moral high ground here.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 2 minutes ago (1 children)

That's like saying that "the majority of crimes in Sweden are committed by white people" is bigotry. It's not bigotry, it's fucking statistics.

[–] houstoneulers@lemmy.world 1 points 1 minute ago* (last edited 54 seconds ago)

No, the argument is that the overall number of crimes is so low you can't make any population inferences lmao

You bigots demonstrating they don't understand sound argumentation.