this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2023
65 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

30579 readers
90 users here now

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it's gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming's sister community Tabletop Gaming.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Jinxyface@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah how dare consumers expect their products to be good

[–] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] GoodEye8@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Sure, but a game is objectively better if it can run at a higher framerate.

Bloodborne is excellent, but it would 100% be better if it ran on solid 60 FPS.

[–] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago

Computers (including consoles) have limited resources, at some point you need to deal with tradeoffs, for example do you prioritize graphics quality or do you prioritize FPS? Do you want/need to have more resources available for the physics engine? That eats on the maximum possible FPS. Do you want to do real time procedural generation? Do you want to use the GPU to run some kind of AI? All this are design considerations and there's no one size fits all prioritization decision for all videogames. Clearly the people working on Starfield believe that for their intended game experience graphic fidelity is more important than FPS, and this is a perfectly valid design choice even if you don't agree with it.