this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2023
65 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

30579 readers
90 users here now

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it's gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming's sister community Tabletop Gaming.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hakonlo@beehaw.org 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This incessant nagging about fps is the most tiresome thing in gaming since gamergate.

[–] Jinxyface@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah how dare consumers expect their products to be good

[–] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] GoodEye8@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Sure, but a game is objectively better if it can run at a higher framerate.

Bloodborne is excellent, but it would 100% be better if it ran on solid 60 FPS.

[–] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago

Computers (including consoles) have limited resources, at some point you need to deal with tradeoffs, for example do you prioritize graphics quality or do you prioritize FPS? Do you want/need to have more resources available for the physics engine? That eats on the maximum possible FPS. Do you want to do real time procedural generation? Do you want to use the GPU to run some kind of AI? All this are design considerations and there's no one size fits all prioritization decision for all videogames. Clearly the people working on Starfield believe that for their intended game experience graphic fidelity is more important than FPS, and this is a perfectly valid design choice even if you don't agree with it.

[–] garretble@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I agree up to a point. If a game is at 30 and feels good to play, then I’m OK. For example, Zelda feels great. Controlling Link is tight and snappy.

On the other hand, if the game has bad frame pacing (like Bloodborne), playing at 30 feels real bad.

I try not to get too crazy about frames, but sometimes some games just don’t feel good.

I will say, though, that while I really like channels like Digital Foundry, I sometimes wonder if them picking apart games to show the most minor frame dips is slowly teaching us to see these things, and as a result we kind of subconsciously will be like, “Well now I noticed this game had some moments where the frames dropped during an explosion. Obviously it’s a bad game.” I know that’s some hyperbole, but still.

[–] Taxxor@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's also heavily dependend on getting used to it. There are games that have a quality and a performance mode where I sometimes start to think I'm at 60FPS until I switch to the actual 60FPS mode and realize that it's a completely different feeling. Switching back lets those 30FPS seem pretty bad. But if I didn't had the possibility of switching between those two, I would've been happy with the 30.

But as you said it has to be rock stable. I played GoW Ragnarök on my PS5 and that Quality 30FPS mode was just terrible and felt like 20FPS. That of the Final Fantasy 16 Demo is better but here it's not so much the choppy feeling but the overdone motion blur that bugs me enough to wan't toi switch to the 45-60FPS mode

[–] Cryst@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

I have no problem playing 30 fps games. It's when it goes really low like 10 fps that it's choppy. Like dark souls in blighttown. Now that isn't the best to play. But it's still doable and an awesome game. 30 fps games are great. 60 is butter but not necessarily.