this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2025
123 points (93.0% liked)

Asklemmy

44697 readers
1698 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Why are the journalist bending over to Musk?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] oxjox@lemmy.ml 37 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

You've asked two different questions.

  1. Why don't the democratic voters actually riot
  • First, riots are illegal. I think you mean protest.
  • Protest what? He was just elected president. A bit more than the majority of the electorate made this choice so we all have to deal with it. It's called democracy.
  • He ran a relatively transparent campaign. So far, all he's done is sign executive orders we all knew he was going to do. A majority of Americans voted for these actions.
  1. Why are the journalist bending over to Musk?
  • Why aren't they calling his nazi salute a nazi solute? Fear.
  • I read an article saying Jon Stewart was the only one the mentioned Musk's salute. I watched the segment and, while he did mention it, he did not call it a nazi salute. He tried to, in Jon's funny way, make an excuse for what he was doing.
  • I suspect there are legal reasons for not calling this a nazi salute. Likely defamation.
  • There's also people / organizations (like the ADL) who, for whatever reason, need to be kept in the good grace's of these powerful people or who need to maintain their seat at one table or another.
[โ€“] djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Protest what?

Didn't stop Republicans on Jan 6. The truth seems to be that one side is willing to do anything to gain power, and the other is unwilling to do anything to keep it.

[โ€“] Stovetop@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

I don't think there's any contradiction there, though. The Dems aren't rioting because they accept legitimate outcomes, while the Republicans are only accepting favorable outcomes. No one is rioting right now because the Dems accept Trump's win as legitimate and the Republicans accept it as favorable.

[โ€“] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Most telling move IMO is how they sidelined Tim Walz for being 'too radical'.

All he was doing was talking facts and smack. Democrats can't have that! It's not decent!

[โ€“] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

First, riots are illegal.

Only if you lose. Get your man in power by any means necessary and he will pardon you.

Protest what? He was just elected president.

Trump losing in 2020 was the only reason needed for a riot.

[โ€“] SARGE@startrek.website 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Every single part of this comment just screams "It just wouldn't be proper!"

And I'm sorry, but I can't seem to care about what's "proper" when half my friends now have reasonable fear for their lives, not just "comfort of living" just because they are lgbtq+ living in deep red country.

[โ€“] oxjox@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

No one said anything about proper.

I answered the questions posed. I didn't add any other context or inject my feelings into it. If you want to have a discussion about the ramifications of this person being elected, that's another conversation. I'd be happy to engage with that and I'm sure you and I would be in agreement.

[โ€“] seang96@spgrn.com 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

He lost the majority vote so technically not a majority of voting Americans voted for him.

[โ€“] oxjox@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's a bit concerning that you have this fact mistaken.

Trump: 77,168,458 49.9%
Harris: 74,749,891 48.3%

https://www.reuters.com/graphics/USA-ELECTION/RESULTS/zjpqnemxwvx/president/

[โ€“] seang96@spgrn.com 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Ah your right it was just a extremely close gap after all the tallying was done. Shows how bad memory can be.