this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2025
305 points (96.1% liked)

World News

39605 readers
2839 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy warned Europe that it cannot withstand Russia without Ukraine’s military, calling Ukraine’s victory vital to stopping Kremlin expansion.

Speaking to Polish media, Zelenskyy stressed that Russia’s larger, more brutal army would target other European nations if Ukraine falls.

He criticized Western allies for underestimating Russian President Vladimir Putin’s ambitions, urging them to strengthen Ukraine’s defenses.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 34 points 17 hours ago (5 children)

I think we should help Ukraine, but Russia would get their clock cleaned by European NATO (even without US).

[–] DicJacobus@lemmy.world 7 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

and Europe would take catastrophic casualties in doing so.
America is an ocean away, and doesn't have to worry about war on their soil.

Europe on the other hand, can you honestly say that society is ready for events like Bucha on their soil? a Russian brigade breaks through the line, gets bogged down,isnt able to advance any further, so decides to loot , rape and mass murder the population before retreating?

Bucha and Mariupol is why the entire NATO strategy changed. it used to be that the baltics would effectively be surrendered temporarily while the European backbone mobilized, France Germany Poland etc. But thats no longer an option because intelligence knows that the Russian Soldiery, for lack of a better term, act like savage ghouls. and will put innocent men women and children to the sword for no reason other than spite.

and failing that, they will bomb a city to dust like they did to Mariupol, Bakhmut, and so many others

One thing Russia has infintely more experience than Europe, its people are used to the realities of war, Martial law, no rights, Resource scarcity, No protesting. they just behave like lemmings now. Its sad, but its an advantage.

European populations would be calling for an armistice and selling out countries on the periphery as soon as it started because they dont want to go to war.

[–] MyTurtleSwimsUpsideDown@fedia.io 46 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Regardless, I’d rather we not test that theory. It doesn’t matter which side wins, we all would lose.

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 12 points 15 hours ago

As long as the nuke is dropped on my head, I don't care.

[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 hours ago

I could use a break from all this winning tho

[–] seven_phone@lemmy.world 23 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Putin has said as much, it is why he constantly reminds everyone of his nuclear arsenal and apparent willingness to end the world over small matters.

[–] skvlp@lemm.ee 30 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Small dick energy on Putins part.

[–] IAmLamp@fedia.io 9 points 17 hours ago

Astroturfing orcs downvoting

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world -4 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Putin doesn't own a big red button he can push to launch nukes. There are layers in command that would not comply. And they've done it before. Same goes for Trump.

[–] DicJacobus@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

the Russian system is far less removed from failsafes than the US one is.

while I dont think its active anymore, the russian system was rumoured to be completely autonomous too, meaning if connection was broken between points A and B, or however the network was set up, such as Moscow or the supposed command bunkers in Mount Yamantau got taken out, some missiles would launch automatically.

as I said though, I dont think they've had the dead hand turned on for many many years. trusting a soviet computer not to malfunction is like playing russian roulette with 4 in the cylinder.

[–] endeavor@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 hours ago

except ukraine was the one maintaining russian missiles and we know very well how poor russian military maintenance culture is and how low the morale is to do anything if failure to do so does not result in beatings/rape. Pair that with how damn remote everything is and how even in 90s there were silos where not the high maintenance missile was in disrepair but the silo basic systems were, then the more accurate analogy would be "russian roulette with 25 round capacity cylinder, 10 rounds in and 90% are duds.

[–] khannie@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

I'm not sure how, for one second you believe that if Putin ordered a nuclear strike, that order wouldn't be carried out.

[–] DicJacobus@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

I think some people underestimate how spiteful Russians are.

their whole national identity, since the advent of Z-Fascism, has become "We dont care if we die, But we'll take you with us, you have far more to lose than us"

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

Maybe or maybe not.

Look at Israel. Why do you think the US sending them more weapons for their genocide every month? Because they don't have the material to fight a protracted war. That's largely how it is in Europe too, and it's a good thing, because they don't have the 'bomb first and then ask questions later' mentality that Americans do.

[–] deadcream@sopuli.xyz -3 points 17 hours ago (5 children)

How many NATO soldiers have experience fighting a full-scale war on their territory against an enemy with similar technological and production capabilities?

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 12 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

How many NATO soldiers have experience fighting a full-scale war on their territory against an enemy with similar technological and production capabilities?

I'm not sure, but since this is the Russian-Ukraine conflict we're talking about, we don't have to worry about one showing up. Russia is barely a near peer to Ukraine, they wouldn't stand a snowballs chance in hell against more than one country at a time without their nukes, let alone NATO as a whole.

Nukes are literally the only thing that lets Russia pretend they're still a superpower and not a failed state. But as we can see in Ukraine, they can't even beat a former client state and has to resort to bringing our cold war era equipment, so double lol at "similar capabilities"

[–] DicJacobus@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Russia is more than capable of butchering european civilian populations, that is the main concern.

everyone knows they'd get their shit rocked in conventional war, its the mass murder of civilians, bombardment of cities, and retaliatiory table flipping ragequit nuclear attacks that everyone is afraid of.

[–] endeavor@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 hours ago

Realtalk, Ukraine and russia are the only two big nations with experience in drone warfare, which is the current patch. Everyone else hasn't really updated yet.

[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 9 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I believe you are forgetting about the vast and formidable legion of battle-hardened and experienced North Korean soldiers they have at their disposal. /s

[–] Nasan@sopuli.xyz 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Don't forget the various foreign nationals they tricked with promises of well paying support jobs only to hand them rifles and send them to the front lines.

[–] endeavor@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 hours ago

That is more concerning since they are almost all exclusively pedophiles.

[–] htrayl@lemmy.world 24 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

"similar technological and production capabilities"

Okay bud. Russia has pretty effectively burned through their best equipment and skilled fighters and is basically running on pure authoritarian insistence right now.

[–] DicJacobus@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

fighting a conventional war, yeah they're a joke.
but they are more than capable of butchering european civilian populations, bombarding cities, and if need be, flipping the table in a rage and launching, after they panic when their conventional forces are defeated.

you dont need a sophisticated army to commit mass murder and destruction. the concern isn't about preventing european militaries from being outmanuevered, surrounded and killed. its about preventing the russians from tiny breakthroughs that result in things like Bucha or Mariupol, where a city is burned to the ground, where a town has hundreds of innocent people executed.

[–] Zetta@mander.xyz 9 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Similar technologies is an extreme stretch as well, Russia is not anywhere near the technology level of other NATO nations. They need China to get anywhere near that level, and I'm not sure China would give them that level of support if a wider conflict broke out.

[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 8 points 17 hours ago

against an enemy with similar technological and production capabilities?

We're talking about Russia here.

[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 hours ago

you're right, we should take the fight to them. they should have to deal with cleaning up landmines etc after all their base are belong to us

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] BrokenGlepnir@lemmy.world 7 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Training will only get your units to level 3. Then it only provides a trickle of army XP to maybe get a doctrine out, at a huge cost of equipment. If you want units at level 5 before the big one starts, you've got to send volunteers. But seriously, I'm pretty sure actual combat is much different than training.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 7 points 17 hours ago

A random story on that topic: A family member of mine, who was in the service, got where he was going with his people, told everybody what to do, and everything got underway. A little group of people went down the path they were supposed to go down. A little while later one of their guys comes TEARING back up the path, all in a panic, and yells at my family member "JESUS CHRIST SERGEANT THEY'RE KILLING PEOPLE DOWN THERE".

Like, yeah, I get it. It's pretty fucking upsetting. Training is one thing and seeing people turning into corpses and chunks flying off them is way, way different. I'm not trying to make light, because I do get what he was getting it, but my family thought it was pretty funny.