this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2024
141 points (86.5% liked)

World News

39102 readers
2256 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

You're missing the point, which is that we don't normally measure reserves in centuries. We prospect as needed, and there is no reason to think that we would be unable to locate new deposits as necessary. All this and more is covered in the source you linked.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world -1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

We prospect as needed

Which has never once caused a problem before, am I right?

[–] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Love how you ignored their actual point to focus on the one thing they said that didn't apply to the topic

That's what we normally do, which is a problem

But for nuclear we have centuries worth of stockpile, so we dont have to do that

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world -1 points 13 hours ago

We don't know we have centuries worth of stockpile. That's just an assumption.

In fact, I think it's a foolish assumption to make since if the world's nuclear powers haven't been quietly prospecting the globe for new sources of Uranium since 1945, they sure should have been. But you don't hear about a lot of new uranium mines opening.

And what if this big stockpile us close to a major waterway? Or under a bunch of people's homes?

Acting like "we can just look and find more" as if it's that simple doesn't make sense to me.