AwesomeLowlander

joined 2 months ago
[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 1 points 58 minutes ago

I mean, most of the masses already do meet that requirement. OP seems to think there are only 'masses' in the US and nowhere else.

I have never understood people who make this argument. In all of history, can you point to a single time when technology wasn't eventually commercialised and made available to the masses at affordable prices? The billionaires don't want to keep it to themselves, they want you buying more stuff from them.

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 2 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (2 children)

Caveat 1: Move out of the US

Caveat 2: ???

Caveat 3: Extended youth

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 6 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah it's not like the rest of the population ever benefits from advances in technology... Oh wait...

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I have semi face-blindness, it takes several meetings before I can start recognising a person's face. Something like this would actually be a lifesaver for me, just so I can know who I'm talking to and whether I've met them before.

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 day ago (2 children)

So you're saying, the US just bombed Japan?

The main problem here is it's delaying adoption of EVs, which is hurting the environment and is an externalised cost that somehow never gets accounted for.

The actual point was, bomb making instructions have been floating around on search engine results since the days of dial up. That particular manuscript itself has existed since before the days of the Internet. There's nothing cgpt could give you that you couldn't have found by typing the same query into Google. Getting the instructions is literally the easiest, least effort, least risk part of building a bomb.

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I see you've never heard of the Anarchist's Cookbook

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Is it more of a public safety issue than if they actually build a working one from a legit bomb manual and deploy it?

Setting aside the issue of intelligent sea worms, why is the meme inaccurate? The point of the meme is about a professional confidently making an inaccurate claim, why would you believe any of the other information they state is more accurate than the claim they made?

view more: next ›