this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2024
22 points (84.4% liked)

Ask Lemmy

26968 readers
1350 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I don't know who started this, but I always feel frustrated when I see headline along the lines of "USA says" or "China signal", countries are not people.

I don't understand why don't even the best news outlets put headlines like " Official x said this on official order on USA" Or something like that.

I really don't understand who came up with this way of reporting where they report on officials as their country and I always thought that this is dumb.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ChefTyler1980@lemmy.world 9 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

If the statement is an official one why does it matter who delivered it?

[–] Joker@sh.itjust.works -3 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

It's more factually correct and better representative of the situation.

Just because official X said that, does not mean that the whole country is ok with him.

Citzens and politicians should be separated to keep emotions outside of this.

Let me show you two headlines here:

"Russian president declare officially a war on Ukraine"

Or

"Russia declare war on Ukraine"

Which one is more representative and more accurate of the situation?

I think you would understand my point from my example here.

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago

Just because official X said that, does not mean that the whole country is ok with him.

Im pretty sure everybody knows that. It probably doesn't need to be spelled out every single time someone makes am announcement.

"Company X is excited for release of new product"

Vs.

"This Company X PR rep says they are excited for release of new product, although the 10,000 other employees at Company X have not yet made official statements on their opinions of new product."

[–] simplymath@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

This is so common in writing that is has its own name.

All hands on deck

Yes. The person speaking probably wants the legs, torsos, etc of the crew there as well.

Why do they say the shorter thing? Because it means exactly the same thing to anyone who has taken high school level English classes and uses fewer words.

"Russia" is not an entity that has an ability to do things and readers understand that.

[–] ChefTyler1980@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

Well Russia is a country. Russians are citizens. There’s a test here whether or not a reasonable person can understand and I would argue that a reasonable person would understand the difference between a country and a citizen of the country.