this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
119 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

10175 readers
88 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

We already have age limits at the lower end. Why are people so against age limits at the upper end?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] megopie@beehaw.org 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Eh, frankly, I’m not a big fan of age limits or term limits, I think they’re fundamentally undemocratic. If people in a state keep electing someone then it is their right to do so.

Banning people over a certain age or who have served a certain amount of terms doesn’t solve the core issue in such circumstances, that being gerrymandering, voter suppression, and wide spread misinformation and disinformation spread by bad actors. There are plenty of old representatives and senators who I have endless respect and trust for, and it would really be a shame if they were forced to leave office just because they hit some arbitrary number of years or terms.

[–] sin_free_for_00_days@lemmy.one 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The Constitution says that a person can't be under 30 to serve in the Senate. Is that saying that there aren't any sub-30 year olds who would be great Senators? Why is one arbitrary limit OK, but one on the other end of the range suddenly undemocratic? That just makes no sense to me.

[–] Lowbird@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

I don't think they agree with that lower limit either. They didn't say anything to make me think it's not included in the age limits they're talking about.

[–] BlueNine@beehaw.org 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Legislative work is a career. One gets better at their career the longer they do it. I don’t hire rookie electricians, and I hate that my state forces to vote for useless green legislators. They don’t know what they are doing and they kowtow to lobbyists and interests who write all the bills that pass here. Term limits are step one in legislative capture.

Thanks for making room for an opinion that is often unpopular in left dominated online spaces.

[–] kool_newt@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Eventually one might come to the conclusion that there is no way to have people in power and it not be abused.

[–] BlueNine@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And yet, communities have collective needs, and require that some of us administer those needs. What are we to do? Embrace anarchy or libertarianism? Not for me I don’t think. Just push for systems that create positive, pro-social incentive structures. It is the best I think we can do.

[–] kool_newt@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

You're using "anarchy" as analogous to "chaos". Embrace each other rather than a group that claims power using violence.

[–] megopie@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

You can have people in power and have them not abuse it assuming that the public in turn has the power and information to remove or reprimand them them when they do so.

Obviously that can be difficult to implement well but it is far from impossible.

[–] megopie@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

The funny thing is, the “term limits for legislators” and “age limits for legislators” did not come out of left wing theorists or even social liberal theorist, they came from Koch funded think tanks like the heritage foundation! It’s another example of how effective astroturfing and targeted political “advertising” can be at manipulating both side of the political spectrum.

[–] JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Please, what old senators do you have respect and trust for?

[–] irasponsible@beehaw.org 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yes, of course literally the one and only. I trust him too. He is the only one. Literally the only senator that I would actually trust to do the right thing, in both the Senate and the House.

1 person against 99 can't do almost anything though. OP said plural senators

[–] Lowbird@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

And just look at all the young, horrible GOP house reps. Or the young neo-lib reps. They're certainly no better than the old ones.

An age limit would just result in the same exact situation as now, but with everyone younger.

The house and senate are old and terrible, but they're not terrible because they're old. The system just happens to promote both things.