this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

58531 readers
4982 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Let's put it this way; when Microsoft announced its plans to start adding features to Windows 10 once again, despite the operating system's inevitable demise in October 2025, everyone expected slightly different things to see ported over from Windows 11. Sadly, the latest addition to Windows 10 is one of the most annoying changes coming from Windows 11's Start menu.

Earlier this year, Microsoft introduced a so-called "Account Manager" for Windows 11 that appears on the screen when you click your profile picture on the Start menu. Instead of just showing you buttons for logging out, locking your device or switching profiles, it displays Microsoft 365 ads. All the actually useful buttons are now hidden behind a three-dot submenu (apparently, my 43-inch display does not have enough space to accommodate them). Now, the "Account Manager" is coming to Windows 10 users.

The change was spotted in the latest Windows 10 preview builds from the Beta and Release Preview Channels. It works in the same way as Windows 11, and it is disabled by default for now because the submenu with sign-out and lock buttons does not work.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] spirinolas@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I'm in the EU and use Windows 10 LTSC so I mostly clear off of this bulshit. A few months ago I bought a cheap refurbished laptop to use occasionally and decided from day 1 it would be Linux Mint only since I only use it for the basics.

A few months later and I'm surprised how far Mint came. It's so easy to use. Customizing it was a bit harder but nothing major. And to my surprise...even games. I threw a couple of games at it and everything the computer can handle would run. I was from the time where gaming on Linux was a no-no.

When LTSC support goes, I'll most likely go full Linux. The only problem is the Adobe software but maybe I can fix that with a virtual machine.

[–] InternetUser2012@lemmy.today 0 points 1 month ago

I tried that LTSC a couple years ago when I had a Nvidia card and I couldn't get a driver install that would let me play the new release games.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 month ago

With the craziness around Adobe products you might want to move away from Adobe at some point as well.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (3 children)

...decided from day 1 it would be Linux Mint only since I only use it for the basics

What kind of out of the ordinary things cannot be done with it?

I switched from Windows 3.11 and I'm still puzzled by this.

[–] Hackworth@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Cannot be done with Mint? I've OS hopped every few years - currently running Windows 11 at work and Mint at home. I much prefer the Mint install. That said, I'm a video producer - and video production just isn't there yet on Linux. CUDA's a pain to get working, proprietary codecs add steps, Davinci's linux support is more limited than it seems, KDenLive works in a pinch but lacks features, Adobe and Linux are like oil and water, there's no equivalent for After Effects... I don't doubt that there are workarounds for many of these issues. But the ROI's not there yet. I'd love to see a video production focused distro that really aimed for full production suite functionality. Especially since Hackintoshes are about to get even harder to build.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I guess that's a valid edge case. Although I thought that some professional editing suites had been ported (not Adobe's, obviously). Apparently it's not the case.

[–] Nastybutler@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I always love when people pretend to be mystified that someone has trouble running programs on Linux when I, a non Linux user, see plenty of examples of people having trouble getting programs to run on Linux scrolling through "Everything" on Lemmy

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Well, some people want to run programs on Linux that were written for other operating systems.

As it happens, it can be done, but it's not the simplest way to do things.

It's like buying a PlayStation and complaining it won't run Super Mario properly.

[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What if those are the basics?

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

If those are your basics, have you considered running a Nintendo system?

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

I tried but Nintendo issued a DMCA takedown

[–] noughtnaut@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The way your comment reads, you've been using Windows 3.11 these past decades. 😂

[–] geophysicist@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 month ago

Why fix what isn't broken