this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2023
39 points (100.0% liked)

Food and Cooking

6444 readers
1 users here now

All things culinary and cooking related. Share food! Share recipes! Share stuff about food, etc.

Subcommunity of Humanities.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] black_mouflon@beehaw.org 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Also other than the inherent disgust to bug there is also the fact that since bugs are so small animals they can't be cleaned and separeted to different parts of the animal. This means that part of what you eat is the intestines of the animal with all the fecal matter in it.

I simply don't want shit (or processed shit) in my food. Is that too big of an ask?

[–] butterypowered@feddit.uk 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] black_mouflon@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Large fishes are able to be cleaned so you can choose those.

[–] butterypowered@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago

Oh absolutely. That’s why I said “a lot of seafood” and not all seafood.

As a kid I was grossed out by ‘the black line’ on shrimp/prawns but these days I don’t care.

I guess wiping baby butts and picking up my dog’s crap has made me a bit more tolerant of these things. :D

[–] HanlonsButterknife@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Most fish, shrimp, lobster are prepared so that you aren't eating the intestines. The closest seafood-with-intact-intestines I can think of off the top of my head that makes it to the table is crawfish, and de-veining them is a part of the eating process

[–] butterypowered@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago

Honestly I think every time I’ve had shrimp, the vast majority have still had the vein.

King prawns are a bit different - at least they’re large enough for deveining to be practical.

[–] ericjmorey@beehaw.org 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The industrial beef slaughterhouses don't exactly have a pristine track record of keeping shit out of the market either.

[–] black_mouflon@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Still by the nature o these animals being bigger it is practicality easier to separate the different parts. With everithing else being equal. No matter how bad it is, it is going to be less than 100% of the initial shit ammount unlike with the bugs wich I'll imagine are being crushed whole.

[–] argv_minus_one@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

You ever eat a sausage? The casing is made out of intestine. Before it was used as a sausage casing, it was used as a shit container, and it probably still contains traces of shit.

It also probably contains a few radioactive atoms, a bit of mercury here and there, maybe some arsenic…

Until and unless food is synthesized from atoms by a Star Trek replicator, it's going to contain things you don't want to eat. The best we can do is remove most of those things, but try as we might, we can't remove them all.