Pretty much all my interactions with the community here have been positive, aside from a few toxic trolls such as yourself. Maybe take your own advice there champ.
I have backed up my claims with evidence and sources. Stay mad troll.
Exactly, in the west competition between companies is a zero sum game. This precludes companies from cooperating on technology, and leads to a lot of duplicated effort as people reinvent the wheel over and over. In China, competition is often a positive sum game where everybody gets to learn from each other, and move forward together.
Just ignore it, upvotes and downvotes ultimately mean nothing.
It's obviously not since the whole reason DeepSeek is interesting is the new mixture of experts algorithm that it introduces. If you don't understand the subject then maybe spend a bit of time learning about it instead of adding noise to the discussion?
I expect we're going to be seeing a lot of crazy technological advancement coming out of China in the coming years. They've basically caught up with the west now, but technology doesn't progress linearly. There are mutually reinforcing effects from different technological breakthroughs that all combine to accelerate progress. And the other big aspect is that China actively direct technological development towards socially useful areas. Meanwhile in the west, technology is developed primarily to create profit for the financial capitalist class with little regard of any social value.
It doesn't mean it's easy, but it is certainly possible if somebody was dedicated enough. At the end of the day you could even use the open source code DeepSeek published and your own training data to train a whole new model with whatever biases you like.
I don't really care what you think bud. Stay in your lane.
16
Ukraine’s Existence ‘At Risk’ Without Peace Talks by Summer, Says Intelligence Chief
(www.kyivpost.com)
Workers, who possess intimate knowledge of their tasks and the specific challenges they face, are best positioned to make informed decisions about how to optimize their work processes and achieve their goals. Worker ownership not only enhances efficiency and productivity but also fosters a sense of individual fulfillment and empowerment. In contrast, the top-down, hierarchical structures prevalent in capitalist enterprises often stifle creativity, initiative, and motivation. Workers, alienated from their labor as outlined in Das Kapital, are reduced to mere cogs in the machine, their creative potential and autonomy stifled. Their alienation manifests in several ways. Firstly, workers have little to no say in the decision-making process, breeding a sense of powerlessness and disenfranchisement. Secondly, they are frequently performing repetitive and monotonous tasks, leading to a lack of fulfillment and a sense of detachment from the fruits of their labor. Thirdly, the products of their labor are owned by the capitalist, further reinforcing their estrangement from the process of production.
Embracing a cooperative ownership model empowers workers and leads to better use of their expertise, promoting innovation, adaptability, and resilience. This approach aligns with the principles of delegation and decentralization observed in nature, where local control mechanisms play an indispensable role in the overall health and well-being of the organism. Furthermore, cooperative ownership fosters a more equitable distribution of power and resources, ensuring that the benefits of economic activity are shared more broadly among the community.
These theoretical advantages are also supported by empirical evidence. Research indicates that some cooperatives are not only more productive than traditional companies but also better at preserving jobs during economic downturns. Their resilience stems in part from the increased worker participation in decision-making processes, which allows cooperatives to respond more effectively to market fluctuations and other challenges. By giving workers a stake in the company’s success and a voice in its operations, cooperative ownership models create a more engaged and motivated workforce, leading to improved performance and greater adaptability.
This phenomenon is illustrated in Virginie Pérotin’s study, “The Performance of Workers’ Cooperatives,” that highlights the benefits of cooperative ownership compared to traditional firms. The study emphasizes that the unique features of cooperative enterprises, such as worker participation and shared ownership of capital, are key strengths contributing to their success. Substantial evidence across various contexts demonstrates that these cooperatives are at least as productive, and often more so, than conventional firms. Notably, the study finds a direct correlation between the level of worker participation in a cooperative and its overall productivity.
Pérotin’s research reveals that cooperatives with measures like asset locks and collective capital accumulation tend to be more productive (as seen in French cooperatives) or better at preserving jobs (as in Italian cooperatives) than conventional capitalist enterprises. Much of their success can be attributed to the fact that in a labor-managed firm, members actively participate in decisions that directly affect their employment and income risks. A participatory structure mitigates the potential for managerial moral hazard, leading to more informed and responsible decision-making regarding investment, strategy, and human resources.
Furthermore, worker participation in profit-sharing and decision-making allows for greater flexibility in adjusting pay rather than resorting to layoffs during economic downturns. This adaptability not only benefits the workers but also contributes to the overall stability of the company.
Notably, the benefits extend far beyond the confines of individual companies. When business profits are equitably distributed among the workers, a ripple effect is set in motion that strengthens the entire economy. This occurs because money remains in circulation, flowing back into local communities as workers spend their earnings on goods and services, supporting other businesses and leading to a virtuous cycle of economic activity. Equitable distribution of wealth also ensures that the working majority has sufficient savings and disposable income to weather economic downturns, thus creating a more resilient economy that is less susceptible to boom-and-bust cycles.
It’s important to note that the success of worker cooperatives is not a new phenomenon. While often overlooked in mainstream economic discourse, cooperative models have a rich history and have proven effective in various contexts. The Mondragon Corporation in Spain, for instance, is a federation of worker cooperatives that has thrived for over six decades, demonstrating the long-term viability and resilience of this model.
It has everything to do with the tech being open. You can dispute it all you like, but the fact is that all the code and research behind it is open. Anybody could build a new model from scratch using open data if they wanted to. That's what matters.
It's where the archive redirects from the link, looks like they revised it significantly.
Oh no, people here have biases different from your own. The horror! Meanwhile, I provided sources in other responses in this thread. You could also just spend your time to google this stuff yourself instead of trolling here, it's not exactly hidden.
Bye!