trafficnab

joined 1 year ago
[–] trafficnab@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago

That's it young man, I'm revoking your DNA privileges

[–] trafficnab@lemmy.ca 0 points 4 weeks ago

The way I see it, creatives lose no matter what here, so they can either lose and only the corpos benefit, or they can lose and everyone benefits

[–] trafficnab@lemmy.ca 0 points 4 weeks ago

OpenAI losing their case is how we ensure that the only people who can legally be in charge of an LLM are massive corporations with enough money to license sufficient source material for training, so I'm forced to begrudgingly take their side here

[–] trafficnab@lemmy.ca 0 points 4 weeks ago

Ah yes, the famous Russian ~~Number~~ Kitty Stations

[–] trafficnab@lemmy.ca 0 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

"The three biggest social media sites on the internet are nothing but screenshots of the other two" is how I heard the last 10 years described

[–] trafficnab@lemmy.ca 0 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (2 children)

Depending on how important these large language models end up being to society, I'd rather everyone be able to freely use copyrighted works to train them, rather than reserve their use solely for the corporations rich enough to pay for the licensing or lucky enough to already have the rights to a trove of source material

OpenAI losing this battle is how we ensure that the only people that can legally train these things are the Microsofts, Googles, and the Adobes of the world

[–] trafficnab@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It feels like such a solution in search of a problem, why would I need wireless earbuds for possibly the single device I own that, if I'm using it, will never be more than wire-length away from my ears, it's literally either in my hand or in my pocket

[–] trafficnab@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Every single one of your upvotes on lemmy is already public due to how the protocol works, it's just currently obscured by a bit of work to get them (have to run your own instance, assuming there already isn't some online tool to easily look them up)

Making them publicly and easily visible would only remove the illusion of privacy we currently have, not actually make your upvote logs less secured in any way

[–] trafficnab@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago

We already had first Microsoft anti-trust suit, but what about second Microsoft anti-trust suit?

[–] trafficnab@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 months ago

Every browser is either chromium (open source captured by Google) or exists because of a Google search contract (this represents 80% of Mozilla's revenue), Google can't lose

[–] trafficnab@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 months ago

Chrome really needs to be broken off from Google, the largest ad company owning the largest browser is clearly a huge conflict of interest

[–] trafficnab@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 months ago

Seeing that half of my extensions (it was seriously like 10 of them) were going to be disabled is what pushed me to finally switch to Firefox because if I have to find alternatives to them it might as well be on another browser

view more: next ›