sjmarf

Mobile apps should allow you to log into any instance. My Lemmy client won't connect to lemmy.rip either, and fails with the following error:

The certificate for this server is invalid. You might be connecting to a server that is pretending to be “lemmy.rip”, which could put your confidential information at risk.

This is also what I see when I try to connect to lemmy.rip in the browser:

I am able to bypass this warning and see the site in the browser.

https://amp.knowyourmeme.com/memes/white-man-has-been-here

In 2000, American painter Robert Griffing created a painting titled, Friend or Foe, wherein, two Native American hunters are examining footprints made in the snow.

“Cat looks inside”

https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/cat-looks-inside

Most mobile clients allow you to hide posts that contain a certain keyword in their title. Here's a non-exhaustive list of clients that support keyword filtering off the top of my head:

• Voyager (multiplatform; I believe you need to have the app because the option doesn't show up on the website for me)
• Mlem (iOS)
• Arctic (iOS)
• Thunder (Android)
• Sync (Android)

I don't know of any that can hide posts with a keyword mentioned in any of the post's comments; doing so would require the client to make a lot of extra API requests.

~~It has a dark mode now (on iOS, at least. Maybe they’ve got a different codebase for Android)~~

Edit: Scratch that. Only the login flow has dark mode.

#1 and #2 are tobacco and obesity, for those wondering.

Here’s the relevant issue on the GitHub repo: https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/4340

Unfortunately it looks like SubLinks is mostly dead. They haven’t made any changes to the code since August

Or do think there's something special about the person that makes them flip tails more often?

Yes, that’s the conclusion that the scientist has come to. The chance of getting 20 in a row is so extraordinarily unlikely that it’s reasonable to conclude that the chance is not 50/50 for that particular surgeon.

The normal person thinks that because the last 20 people survived, the next patient is very likely to die.

The mathematician considers that the probability of success for each surgery is independent, so in the mathematician’s eyes the next patient has a 50% chance of survival.

The scientist thinks that the statistic is probably gathered across a large number of different hospitals. They see that this particular surgeon has an unusually high success rate, so they conclude that their own surgery has a >50% chance of success.

Let's not forget Hitachi