imaqtpie

joined 1 year ago
[–] imaqtpie@lemmy.myserv.one 1 points 3 weeks ago

It's possible to turn off local community creation, image uploads, etc.

Lemmy.myserv.one doesn't host any local content but you can easily browse the rest of the fediverse. Having a diversity of server sizes and formats is definitely a benefit of Lemmy that we should be trying to take advantage of.

[–] imaqtpie@lemmy.myserv.one 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You don't need those commas in that sentence. It makes you sound like Christopher Walken 😅

[–] imaqtpie@lemmy.myserv.one 4 points 3 weeks ago

For cost per user, it's only 3 cents. A few others are around 10 cents per user, and the rest are significantly higher.

The instances with lower total cost also have much lower activity, lemmy.ml has 2.4k active users but still only 80€ per month. Impressive.

[–] imaqtpie@lemmy.myserv.one 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Rage against him when he does evil things, by all means. But when you start raging against him 24/7 for no particular reason, it serves no purpose. In fact, it lessens your ability to actually call him out when he does bad stuff, because you sound like the boy who cried wolf.

And more importantly, it also affects the quality of discussion on Lemmy. One major advantage we have over reddit is that people tend to actually read the articles and make insightful comments that add to the discussion. "Hurr Durr Muskrat bad" is the opposite of that, it's a reddit style pandering comment that ultimately has no substance or meaning. When these circlejerky comments become more common than good comments, the value of this site as a forum for legitimate discussion falls off a cliff.

[–] imaqtpie@lemmy.myserv.one 0 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (3 children)

It's baffling how people on Lemmy hate Musk so much and yet can't stop mentioning him in every random, unrelated thread.

The starlink was privately bought as per the article, it wasn't officially procured using federal funds. So the comment I responded to doesn't really make any sense in the context of this post.

But it gets 50 upvotes because Musk is very bad man. I guess that answers my own question about why people can't stop mentioning him on Lemmy: it's free upvotes to shit on him. That's fine I guess, but it can be annoying when it clogs up the discussion in unrelated threads.

[–] imaqtpie@lemmy.myserv.one 0 points 4 weeks ago (11 children)

What dude are you referring to? I'm confused how your comment relates to the article.

[–] imaqtpie@lemmy.myserv.one 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

A few things.

  • Admins can and do ban accounts that downvote rampantly

  • Obvious bot brigading is obvious. It became harder to tell on reddit when they started fuzzing the vote numbers, but could frequently still be figured out. It's easier on Lemmy, someone just has to report some unusual voting pattern to the admin and they can check if the voting accounts look like bots.

  • I was once told that the algorithm is less weighted towards upvoted comments and more weighted towards recent comments on Lemmy, when compared with Reddit. I am not sure if this is true, but I have noticed that recent comments tend to rise above the top upvoted comments in threads when viewing by Hot.

  • Without any way for bad content to be filtered out, you just end up with an endless stream of undifferentiated noise. The voting system actually protects the platform from the encroachment of bots and the ignorant mob, because it helps filter them out from the users who have something of value that they want to contribute.

[–] imaqtpie@lemmy.myserv.one 0 points 3 months ago

I dunno what that guy was thinking, but it seems obvious to me that nuclear fusion is the long term solution for energy generation.

Nuclear fission not so much, but it's definitely debatable which has more fundamental flaws between fission and wind/hydro/solar. All renewable energy sources ultimately depend on natural processes which are not reliable or permanent.

Nuclear fission has no such limitations, but instead trades long term risk for short term stability. Basically renewable sources are and always will be somewhat unreliable, and Nuclear fission is the least bad reliable energy source to pair with the renewables. So in the medium term, fission makes a lot more sense than fossil fuels, and in the long term we should be looking to fusion.

[–] imaqtpie@lemmy.myserv.one 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Why not provide it to everyone else?

[–] imaqtpie@lemmy.myserv.one 14 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (4 children)

Anytime I see a ~~trash~~ post that’s where it comes from 9/10.

It's 40% of the whole Lemmy userbase and activity. They've got their fair share of trolls but come on, the worst? Have you forgotten about redditors?

It's hard to be the biggest, and I think their admins are doing a pretty good job.

[–] imaqtpie@lemmy.myserv.one 12 points 4 months ago (4 children)

I saw a fellow mod outright nazi-ing about ( not “saying things I disagree with” but actual nazi fanboy-ing)

A claim like this typically requires evidence.

[–] imaqtpie@lemmy.myserv.one 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Same dude. But you make me look like a God damned casual 😅

Someone needs to make a leaderboard for the most active Lemmy users, that'd be really entertaining

view more: next ›