this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2024
2 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

58458 readers
4579 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ep1cFac3pa1m@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

That seems like a significant security risk

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago (8 children)

Probably not for the reason you think.

Like, it wouldn't be patched into anything official

But it means Musk knew where that ship was 24/7, and I'm pretty sure that's why Ukraine's military stopped using it. Musk tipped off Putin to troop movements.

[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

It's emmitting radio signals that an enemy could use to help locate the ship.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 0 points 4 weeks ago (6 children)

What?

Surface ships are in constant communication with stuff...

You can't just find a signal in the middle of the ocean. Musk can find a starlink signal tho, because he can see what Starlink connects to and it's gps location.

[–] 4am@lemm.ee 0 points 4 weeks ago (6 children)

Yeah but if they go on mission and “go dark” then you still have this starlink thing that may or may not be disabled by the person smuggling it on board. It may also be connected to official things if the owner has bad intentions, or if someone else who does finds it and co-opts it.

There is a lot that could go wrong with unauthorized radio transmission equipment on a warship, and not all of it is obvious.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] feannag@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 weeks ago

Not always

Ships absolutely practice turning everything off.

[–] BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 weeks ago

Depends on where your sensors are and how much dispersion the dish has. If you are flying a surveillance plane into the "beam" then you can passively spot the ship.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 0 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

It wouldn't be... Until it is.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 0 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

No it just wouldn't.

Like, are you imagining a modern US warship doesn't have internet 24/7?

This was for porn and maybe streaming services and social media, but mostly porn.

It wasn't for any official use, because they have that covered.

You're acting like surface ships are submarines....

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Like, are you imagining a modern US warship doesn’t have internet 24/7?

last I checked, no, they don't. they had shitty service while in port, and not much else.

https://www.navytimes.com/news/your-navy/2023/12/29/new-in-2024-better-wi-fi-for-sailors/

fuck mate they only recently started giving their people access ON SHORE.

https://www.stripes.com/branches/navy/2024-01-25/navy-free-wi-fi-pilot-program-12796438.html

so no, I don't think for the average sailor a US warship provides internet access 24/7

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 0 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

That article is about wifi for personal use...

And the second one is about it being free and you're acting like they didn't have Internet before then?

so no, I don’t think for the average sailor a US warship provides internet access 24/7

Yeah man, you have zero idea what people are talking about about.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 0 points 4 weeks ago (7 children)

That article is about wifi for personal use…

do you think the starlink terminal in the OP article was for military use?? bwahahaha

Yeah man, you have zero idea what people are talking about about.

ok buddy, have a nice life.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Vorticity@lemmy.world 0 points 4 weeks ago

Whether they have wifi on ship or not isn't the issue. Sometimes, when a ship goes into an operation, they will turn off all signals except passive or directed signals so that they can't easily be detected. Having a communications signal that isn't under the control of the ship's officers is a huge security risk during operations.

Someone is going to be court martialed over this.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 0 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

Yeah with how many leaks come from war thunder players... lol

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Ep1cFac3pa1m@lemmy.world 0 points 4 weeks ago

The reason I think is because any unofficial and potentially unsecured communications access point seems like a vulnerability. If some moron posts a picture using that unofficial access point I’d be worried it could be traced to the ship’s location.

[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 0 points 4 weeks ago

It was exactly the reason I was thinking

[–] realcaseyrollins@thelemmy.club 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Musk tipped off Putin to troop movements.

I'm sorry, this made me laugh. Is that a widely accepted conspiracy theory in this community? That Elon Musk is a Russian spy?

[–] Cadeillac@lemmy.world 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Did you miss the part where he sent a militarized Cyber Truck to a Russian war criminal, or are you conveniently ignoring it?

[–] BestTestInTheWest@lemmy.world 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

The Russian war criminal stated he got it from musk but that hasn't been confirmed and I don't think we should be taking Kadyrov's word as truth on anything he's a literal war criminal.

[–] Cadeillac@lemmy.world 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

What about the Russian oligarchs backing twitter?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

When did they stop using starlink?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] potentiallynotfelix@lemdro.id 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Musk tipped off Putin to troop movements

Wait he did? Can you provide a source for this? I can only find information about him stopping starlink service in crimea

[–] Summzashi@lemmy.one 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

They can't, because it doesn't exist.

[–] Smc87@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Which also doesn’t definitely mean it didn’t happen.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 4 weeks ago (4 children)

Between Trump stealing national security secrets and shit like this, it's honestly shocking the USA hasn't already become a full-fledged fascist hell-hole. It's currently only half-fledged.

But seriously, it must be fucking child's play for other nations to spy on us with dumb fucking shit like this happening.

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Hey, give us a chance. We have another election right around the corner and things are really looking good for a solid commitment to fully flegged hell-holism.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 0 points 4 weeks ago

Vote for my guy, trust me bro!

crux of the US politics

[–] Stanley_Pain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 4 weeks ago

The weakest link is always the lowest common denominator. I'm pretty sure that the other armies around the world have their fair share of idiots too.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 0 points 4 weeks ago

Still, the ambassador had nothing on senior enlisted crew members of the littoral combat ship USS Manchester, who didn't like the Navy's restriction of onboard Internet access. In 2023, they decided that the best way to deal with the problem was to secretly bolt a Starlink terminal to the "O-5 level weatherdeck" of a US warship. They called the resulting Wi-Fi network "STINKY"—and when officers on the ship heard rumors and began asking questions, the leader of the scheme brazenly lied about it. Then, when exposed, she went so far as to make up fake Starlink usage reports suggesting that the system had only been accessed while in port, where cybersecurity and espionage concerns were lower. Rather unsurprisingly, the story ends badly, with a full-on Navy investigation and court-martial. Still, for half a year, life aboard the Manchester must have been one hell of a ride.

But wait! There's more!

[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 0 points 4 weeks ago

Some McHale's Navy shit only with actual consequences.

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

To make matters even worse...

The chiefs found that the Wi-Fi signal coming off the Starlink satellite transceiver couldn't cover the entire ship, so during a stop in Pearl Harbor, they bought "signal repeaters and cable" to extend coverage.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dhork@lemmy.world 0 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (4 children)

What's better is that, thanks to Elon Musk, "STINKY" is the default name for its Starlink wifi. These people didn't even change that.

https://futurism.com/the-byte/elon-musk-starlink-wifi-stinky

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Can't speak to starlink specifically, but I know some shittier router brands would often reset to factory defaults every time you updated the firmware. Can easily see starlink doing that with a pushed firmware with the expectation some additional cell phone app would restore the correct settings.

So they very well might have turned off broadcasting but it got popped back on while they were on shift and it was detected.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ep1cFac3pa1m@lemmy.world 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Don’t worry! I’m sure the default username and password didn’t get changed either.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] tabarnaski@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

The fact that they didn't even try to hide their ssid (or at least, the report doesn't say they did) shows how stupid people can be with cybersecurity.

[–] Username@feddit.org 0 points 4 weeks ago

Apparently "STINKY" is the default StarLink SSID (Another Musk joke), so yeah...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 0 points 4 weeks ago

can we just fucking all take a break for a month? just have things go to being boring?

I attended a fucking ethics of ai talk at my work, only to run into a fucking knockoff nazi complaining about the founding fathers images being generated with black people, and talking about how silicon valley is too left wing.

either you're so stupid that you don't understand it's a fucking alt-right dog whistle, or you're a fucking nazi who gets very, very upset if you see a black person in any context. Either way, just shut the fuck up.

[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 0 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Here’s the meat and potatoes of the article.

In 2023, they decided that the best way to deal with the problem was to secretly bolt a Starlink terminal to the "O-5 level weatherdeck" of a US warship.

They called the resulting Wi-Fi network "STINKY"—and when officers on the ship heard rumors and began asking questions, the leader of the scheme brazenly lied about it. Then, when exposed, she went so far as to make up fake Starlink usage reports suggesting that the system had only been accessed while in port, where cybersecurity and espionage concerns were lower.

Rather unsurprisingly, the story ends badly, with a full-on Navy investigation and court-martial.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Arkhive@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 4 weeks ago

Just trying to play CoD with THE BOYS back home!! That and running their onlyfans pages. Come on, let them have their fun!

[–] rekabis@lemmy.ca 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Sailors on the ship then began finding the STINKY network and asking questions about it.

Oh, c’mon. it is trivial to make an SSID “hidden” for any networking tech that you have administrative control over. That way, only those “in the know” will know the SSID name to type in, in order to access said wireless network. It would not be “discoverable” by standard wireless-connectivity gear such as the default wifi interface in mobile phones.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 weeks ago (7 children)

Hidden WiFi networks are not actually hidden in the literal sense. They still broadcast beacons that your wifi chip will see as basically “hidden network beacon lives here”. Your network connect interface just decides not to show you a list with a bunch of useless “(hidden)” entries you can’t do anything with.

Also, when a new client wants to connect to the hidden network, the first thing it does is broadcast an unencrypted message saying “HEY, I’M LOOKING FOR [hidden network name]” so it’s completely trivial to unveil the name of hidden networks given enough time.

[–] rekabis@lemmy.ca 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

That’s why I put that term in quotes, and was specific about default networking interfaces. I didn’t go into detail because that confuses a lot of people.

Source: working with wireless networks professionally for pretty much the last quarter century.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Cryxtalix@programming.dev 0 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

For most of the article, I was wondering why people cared so much about some random network, they'll go to the trouble of searching for and writing suggestions about it. People usually aren't that interested in the network infrastructure at government facilities.

That's some pretty significant context the writer didn't even know until informed by a reader.

[–] 14th_cylon@lemm.ee 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] solrize@lemmy.world 0 points 4 weeks ago

Reed to T'Pol: "I was always rather fond of the name Stinky".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kyb6yDaai4M

[–] paddirn@lemmy.world 0 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

And I'm sure whoever put it there faced way more harsher penalties than a certain someone who willfully hid highly classified documents in his bathroom for months and lied about it to investigators.

[–] Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com 0 points 4 weeks ago

Just like a certain someone who had classified documents that they weren't even supposed to have without a handler!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 0 points 4 weeks ago

Heads should roll.

load more comments
view more: next ›