TheObviousSolution

joined 10 months ago
[–] TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee 0 points 17 hours ago

JS is like a disease where it does not need to be. I would honestly welcome an Internet alternative that was all web 1.0 (with up-to-date security updates and methods). There's good uses for it in interactive websites that provide cloud services, but most of it is fud and breaks the whole notion of HTTP GET URLs you can just share and cache.

[–] TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee -1 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Thank you for deciding what was better for us, we would have been so wrong without you. /s

[–] TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee 1 points 19 hours ago

People complain about Russian troll factories, but hey, they are helping develop a reddit alternative so they can't be all that bad.

[–] TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee 92 points 1 day ago (185 children)

I can see criminals easily exploiting this default behavior to stop the car and steal from those inside.

Where's a Johnny cab when you need it, it knows how to deal with criminals.

[–] TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee 27 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

A lot of those emulators, specially the SNES ones, make games better if not outright bearable. There's a lot of games that I could not have completed without spending an absurd amount of time on them without saved states. The Nintendo games out there aren't even exceptionally good, there are plenty of indie alternatives if people give them a chance. It's biggest plus is that the brand does act in a way many AAA publishers fail to do, an assurance of a basic degree of quality fun.

[–] TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee 24 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's possible but reddit isn't the only one looking for engagement, so are individual users. If a site has more users, it has more engagement and content. It is also not impossible to drop the lemmy name when you do go back there to make people aware of the alternative.

[–] TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee 11 points 3 days ago

So rather than allow subs to remain preserved while the replace the mods in place they will push subs to shit on themselves in this latest bout of enshittification.

[–] TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

A good test for that was whether they would allow the inheritance of Steam accounts, but their staff said they wouldn't.

[–] TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee 0 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

If I ever have to get a new one, I will madboi it with a monitor and DTV HDMI decoder.

[–] TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

They could make their own AI CEO and work for it. It would probably have more integrity and personality, too.

[–] TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee 0 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Don't buy them, they are excessively expensive and tt's a better idea to separate the smart functionality into an HDMI device of your choice anyway.

[–] TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee 7 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (4 children)

I wonder how many Steam users are going to get a startling wake up call. For all the praise it gets, Steam was a frontrunner in labeling buy and purchase what is essentially an unlimited time rental that can expire when your free subscription service does.

They can ban and suspend your account for, say, adding the "wrong" CD key into your account (they reserve the right to ban false CD keys) or accepting gifts (if fraud ends up being associated with it), along with all your other purchases if they wanted to, and that would be potentially thousands and thousands of dollars down the drown. Steam could collapse, or it could be passed on to a new CEO that say, sold it to EA, and they could decide to put conditions on that subscriptions or even to empty inactive accounts as they did to their own service. They could even just simply start enforcing their guidelines for bans to their fullest extent. Oh, and each game developer can issue a game ban based on their own code of conduct.

It's funny how little interest there has been to treat your purchases as actual digital goods, except by the NFT crowd who are just in it for the money. Actually, ignore that, if anything, most NFT implementations as of now are treated more as subscription options with a buzzword than a digital good, too. So as an aside, it's also funny how the blockchain crowd avoids using the blockchain as a digital good and uses it as confidence game cash grabs instead.

view more: next ›