RowRowRowYourBot

joined 4 days ago

I an talking about the obligation to clothe the naked, feed the hungry and tend to the suck and you are asking about slavery. There is no obligation to enslave anyone so the only reason to bring up slavery is to then argue against slavery. It us entirely unrelated to the topic at hand.

Im not interested in carrying this on further.

Whomever is doing isglitch is doing a great job

[–] RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Put down the straw bale as constructing straw men is always a waste of everyone’s time.

Well that is certainly the totalitarian perspective for sure.

Do you create a lawful society through criminal acts against people who have not been proven to have broken the law?

I get that we all suspect he is guilty but you know there has been no trial or inquiry thus far, right? The trial was set to start in April.

Bunghole are in wooden barrels. Are you a Cooper?

Odds the pace of the line is too fast to do it right?

[–] RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works 16 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I suspect the real issue is the workers aren't given enough time on the line to do this correctly so they just churn them out to hit the needed metric knowing it will fail after being delivered to the owner.

There's a reason why Musk is paying to dismantle the government.

[–] RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Just remember the names assigned to the gospels are not reflective of the actual apostles. John is likely several different people. Paul wrote most of his letters etc.

Reddit's academicbiblical subreddit is very good if you want non-theological takes on the scriptures.

He needs to be provided that opportunity before being removed as the law states. He isn't defending himself in the press. There needs to be some form of inquiry or trial.

How is this so hard for people to figure out? If you get accused of something you have the right to defend yourself.

It was just weird to see it called incivility when it was not in any way uncivil.

view more: next ›