FooBarrington

joined 1 year ago
[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

"May the odds be ever in your favor" works in almost any situation!

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

They also removed all previous versions except a very old one with known issues, thus exposing people to more danger than necessary in any way.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Nah, that's a happy little accident.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Debian is amazing, but you're right that they are far from noob-friendly. I recently switched to Fedora due to the fast availability of new packages (e.g. KDE Plasma 6.1 with fixed Nvidia drivers), and even the arguably easiest option - Ublue images - had some issues I wouldn't have been able to fix without deep Linux experience.

But there definitely has been a lot of progress over the last couple of years, and I'm sure that will continue. We just have to be mindful of not participating in creating the next Microsoft. Ubuntu is already seen as the default Linux distribution - the further it gets entrenched, the worse for all of us.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago (4 children)

But why move people from Microsoft to another company that is implementing more and more user-hostile "features", when there are alternatives like Mint? If all the new Linux users are herded towards Canonical, it's just giving them even more power to extract profits in the future.

It's far easier to have them start with a community-led project on the same basis. Imagine Ubuntu being enshittified and forked - how should they decide which fork to use, and how can they know it will still exist in a couple of years?

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

No, it's not just about stalkers, it's about harassment in general. But even if it were, even stalkers are still people and don't work fundamentally different.

Feel free to show any research proving me wrong, but unless you find any, the reasonable position is "humans work the same on this topic as on others".

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I know, but it still didn’t fully remove it.

Sure, but it doesn't have to be fully removed to have an effect.

The thing is that there really is no price, nor was there ever one. Your suggestion that you think there is demonstrates that the way blocking worked gave people dangerously wrong ideas.

Sorry, but you don't get to redefine how humans work. There is a price, because friction reduces the likelihood of people following through. Removing that friction increases the likelihood of people following through. You might not want to believe this to be the case, but please read studies on the topic - it's just how humans work. You don't get to dismiss negative effects because you don't believe in them.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Twitter massively reduced visibility for logged-out users, so just logging out doesn't help, you have to log into a different account. This additional fraction reduces the amount of harassment a lot. Not sure that being "more honest" is worth the price, especially when an info box could achieve the same without making harassment easier.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I see where you're coming from, I used to hold the same perspective. But there were already a couple of "unrealistic" plot elements before that - like the gravitational anomalies in their house, or the conveniently-placed-and-magically-kept-open-and-large-enough wormhole, which doesn't seem much less Deus ex machina than the tesseract at the end.

Maybe the biggest difference in perspective is in the "power of love" - I don't think the plot is using that as a solution, that's just Coopers interpretation. The solution is the tesseract created by the future humans, which isn't that much more unrealistic than the wormhole. It was a unique and visually incredibly interesting interpretation of the supposed singularity at the center of a black hole, and sadly there's probably no way we could ever even form theories on what that might look like.

In the end, I'm not sure there's anything less unrealistic that could finish the plot, and I'm fine with the sci-fi elements. But that doesn't make your view any less valid!

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The people working on this are truly incredible. I'm always extremely happy to read about these kinds of endeavors - so many people can do incredible things when given the time and funding.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

What do you mean with "love dimension"? Are you talking about the inside of the black hole? That was explained with the future humans constructing a space that Cooper could understand, navigate, and use to transmit the data necessary for human survival to his daughter. Love is what made his daughter believe in him and attempt to decode the message, but the space itself had nothing to do with love.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

They are perfect to me 🥰

view more: next ›