FiskFisk33

joined 1 year ago
[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

yeah, I understand the tech far better than I understand the law. I thought they legally counted as a contract, i guess they're not even that.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 0 points 3 months ago (8 children)

wait, what are you even buying then?!

I thought (i) at least served as a proof of ownership for (ii)...

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 0 points 3 months ago (11 children)

the NFT is not the art itself, it is at best a proof of ownership.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

that first L stands for large. sanitizing something of this size is not hard, it's functionally impossible.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 29 points 3 months ago (3 children)

it also sees your mouse movements on your way to that box.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 2 points 3 months ago

I'm kinda positive to SpaceX, despite muskyboi, not thanks to.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

salty juice in a poweful blender?

https://youtu.be/vDlMLqdvHzI

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 0 points 3 months ago

or just swich away and let them have their little sandbox to themselves

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 24 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I doubt there's much correlation either way

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 5 points 3 months ago

PFAS are extremely inert, yet they wreak all kinds of havoc in the bodies of humans and animals.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Per-_and_polyfluoroalkyl_substances

Scientists thought, as you say, that them being chemically inert means they wont be dangerous to living creatures. Sadly they were proven wrong on that.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 0 points 3 months ago

in the context that wasn't very clear

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 0 points 3 months ago

ah yes, Technology.

view more: ‹ prev next ›