Huh? They launched plenty of Starlink satellites since March, they may not be enough to keep up with the shutdowns, but rockets have been going up.
this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2024
0 points (NaN% liked)
Technology
58480 readers
4142 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Yeah not to defend Elon or anything, but this post seems pretty misleading now that I'm looking into it. It doesn't look like they're failing to deploy satellites at all. They're up there and communicating with the ground based on every tracking site I'm looking at (including the one linked in the post). I don't know why the new satellites aren't being added to the network as soon as they're launched, but these satellites aren't dead so it seems way more likely to be a logistical choice rather than literally every satellite launched in the last 3 months immediately failing.
You have a link to back up that statement?
The fact that they've been launching satellites for months? Here's a Starlink satellite that launched last week I guess. You can search for Starlink in the catalog there and see tons of others in orbit as well from launches just over the past few weeks.Wikipedia also graphs all the Falcon 9 launch outcomes and it looks like they haven't had a failure to deploy a satellite to orbit since 2016?
Can you back up the claim that these satellites are failing before they've even been turned on? That seems like something that would be covered pretty extensively.
I'm not contesting the rocket launches. The whole point is that the normal activation time is 3 days. It was the nearly the same for all of the versions. The V2 had the largest with 5 day activation time. The activation time on these is 90 days+. My point is he's trying to raise money to cover for the fact his activation time is now 90+ days.
They get them up there but they are not being deployed.
What does "deployed" mean in this context, then?
I should have said "activated". I corrected it so people would understand.
Space X has over 1200 inactive satellites
I know they’re relatively small but 1200 seems like a lot to be up there doing nothing.
Spaceflight now is a blurb talking about the launches. There's no evidence these satellites are active. No defense contractor is waiting three months for a deployment. Also, no amount of Elon shill upvotes will convince anyone you are right when you are clearly completely wrong.
There aren't any defense contractors involved in this, it's a commercial internet service from a for-profit company. They can take as long as they want to activate their satellites as long as they're still communicating with the ground, which they are.
SpaceX is a defense contractor. They handle the majority of the United States govts. satellites. They are working with Northrup Grumman. They are definitely a defense contractor.
Fair, bad choice of words on my part. What I was trying to say is that Starlink isn't a government owned asset, it's a commercial product. While it has the potential for defense applications, the government has no reason to pressure them to activate satellites faster than SpaceX want to.
Post of info on Tiblur by a now 3 hour old lemmy account
Ah, yes, oh so reliable
Yay more space trash in earth orbit
At LEAST it's low orbit so it'll burn up (relatively) quickly.
Does it burn up completely? Nothing gets left behind?
Does it burn up completely?
That's part of a Dragon capsule, not a Starlink satellite.
ah. my bad.
Hard to say, but with how few sizeable chunks of natural stone/metal meteors make it through it's tough to expect some relatively fragile satellites would survive the trip down.
We're only now starting to try and ensure spacecraft are designed in such a way that they completely break up.
Shape/size/material all have an impact on whether something completely breaks up
After a few years the orbit will degrade enough that it'll start to fall back to earth. At that point, the satellite will either burn up completely on re-entry, or partially and the rest will fall to earth.
Either way, each of these satellites will be completely gone from orbit after a few years.
Kessler Syndrome! Let's Go!
Thankfully, these things are at least too low to stay in orbit indefinitely like that
Almost as if people thought ahead about this stuff.
Wild concept, that planning ahead thing is
Did he finally wrest the reins from Gwynne Shotwell? She was calling the shots pretty effectively for a while.
This is my question too. What changed?
Nothing, this article is nonsense.
You've hit complete accuracy just with the first three words of your title. He's a massive failure that somehow people keep hyping and paying attention to.
Failure? Not really.
He wouldn't be worth 230b if he was a failure.
Is he a lying, manipulative, vindictive person? Absolutely
https://satellitemap.space/starlink/launches.html
I hate Elon as much as the next guy but your post doesn’t make sense.
A few months back there was a guy spamming dubious or outright loonie "SpaceX is a total failure!" articles from this site, switching to new accounts to post from as each got banned.
Guess he's back.
Yep this account is 3 hours old
70 upvotes on the post, try harder Elon Lol
Don't be so pathetic. I love to hate on Elon. He's disgusting to me. But you're shady AF and your arguments don't stand up to the facts.
My arguments are sourced by data directly from defense contractors. Take it up with them.
Interesting, because Suspicious Observers reported on it because of the Lemmy post.
That just shows satellites in the air. Doesn't show if they are working. The normal activation time is 3 days. Not 3 months.
False info. Reported for removal.
Reported for false report.