Selfhosted

39452 readers

419 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
No spam posting.
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world

HybridSarcasm@lemmy.hybridsarcasm.xyz

Llama-FS Self-Organizing File Manager (github.com)

submitted 4 months ago by d_ohlin@lemmy.world to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Hadn't seen this here yet, a co-worker of mine sent it my way so I'm just spreading the word. Looks interesting, to say the least! Anyone tried this out or had any other experience with it yet?

all 6 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 4 points 4 months ago

Seems a neat way to lose everything

[–] leftzero@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Why rename the files when you could just categorise and index them..?

This seems unnecessarily destructive.

[–] romp_2_door@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I've been long looking for this rename feature.

I have so many files that are titled

Document-2022(1).pdf

contract(1).pdf

Really wish that they had descriptive titles so I can know what's in them without having to open them

[–] rho50@lemmy.nz 1 points 4 months ago

It would be better to have this as a FUSE filesystem though - you mount it on an empty directory, point the tool at your unorganised data and let it run its indexing and LLM categorisation/labelling, and your files are resurfaced under the mountpoint without any potentially damaging changes to the original data.

The other option would be just generating a bunch of symlinks, but I personally feel a FUSE implementation would be cleaner.

It's pretty clear that actually renaming the original files based on the output of an LLM is a bad idea though.

[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 4 months ago

I can sort of see the appeal, but its not for me. If anything is ever going to rename files for me its going to be a script that I've either written or at least read top to bottom. Not a blackbox inference engine, and especially not one based on an LLM.