HybridSarcasm

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

This is really more of a home networking issue than anything having to do with self-hosting. Please consider posting this in one of the many Lemmy home networking communities.

[–] HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

This is a question probably better-suited for one of the Proxmox communities. But, I’ll give it a try.

Regarding your concerns about new SSDs and old VM configs: why not upgrade to PVE8 on the existing hardware? This would seem to mitigate your concerns about PVE8 restoring VMs from a PVE7 system. Still, I wouldn’t expect it to be a problem either way.

Not sure about your TrueNAS question. I wouldn’t expect any issues unless a PVE8 installs brings with it a kernel driver change that is relevant to hardware.

Finally, there are several config files that would be good to capture for backup. Proxmox itself doesn’t have a quick list, but this link has one that looks about right: https://www.hungred.com/how-to/list-of-proxmox-important-configuration-files-directory/

[–] HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world 37 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Love another iOS option.

[–] HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Nextcloud Photos performs okay, but the interface is very ‘meh’. Plus, the mobile client’s sync is a little unstable. On iOS, there’s no background sync at all.

[–] HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

This seems the correct advice. If the container is on the same host as the data, there’s no need to access the data via Samba. In fact, it’s likely the container doesn’t contain the samba client needed for such connectivity.

Assuming TrueNAS allows the containers to see local data, a bind mount is the way to go.

[–] HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world 22 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This is good stuff. Has it been posted to the project’s GitHub (issue, discussion, etc.)?

[–] HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Have you considered searching the GitHub issues?

[–] HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

IMO, this is a discussion that should be taking place on the project's GitHub. I'm going to lock the comments so I don't get any more reports about commenters' behavior.

[–] HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

Hilariously true

[–] HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

I imagine this would be up to the application. What you’re describing would been seen by the OS as the device becoming unavailable. That won’t really affect the OS. But, it could cause problems with the drivers and/or applications that are expecting the device to be available. The effect could range from “hm, the GPU isn’t responding, oh well” to a kernel panic.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/1147109

As is stated in the title, I created and moderated !prolife@lemmy.world. According to the modlog, this community was removed 10 days ago. The modlog doesn't show me who removed the community. I understand the community wouldn't necessarily be everyone's cup of tea, but the actions taken seem improper.

EDIT

After making my case via email to info@lemmy.world, I received the following response:

"We would rather not have a prolife community on our instance. We were getting a lot of reports about it and we have enough on our plate. I'm sure you can find an instance that better suits your needs."

This community was incredibly small (19 subscribers), had less than 10 postings, and had several waves of trollings. Yet, the admins of lemmy.world would rather do away with this community than bother to review if it has broken any rules or is the target of trolling/bullying. I take nothing away from the right to run their instance as they see fit. Perhaps the Code of Conduct should also explicitly state "we reserve the right to do anything we want, regardless of any published rules".

view more: next ›