this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2023
300 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37739 readers
500 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] grizzzlay@beehaw.org 81 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I really appreciate how Verge has covered this absolute shitshow. The administration is insisting on doing every stupid move possible to get their way, and destroy the communities in the chase to be a generic social TikTok clone.

Good riddance. This place is way better for my mental health.

[–] thesanewriter@vlemmy.net 15 points 1 year ago

The Verge's coverage of this so far has been really good. It's probably because they think drama like this will get a lot of clicks, but even still I've enjoyed their articles.

[–] Domiku@beehaw.org 75 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Absolutely wild. I used to moderate a local-area subreddit with around 39K members and decided to just cut my losses. Deleted my account and never looked back! I was happy to see that the remaining mods stuck with our 2-day blackout plan.

Honestly though, it was such a miserable job. Constant bad-faith arguments from folks trying to post heinous comments about asylum seekers, LGBTQ+ folks, etc. It really makes you lose faith in your fellow man. I'm very happy to have given it up. I guess this is why Facebook spends millions of dollars on content moderation -- it's very taxing.

[–] StenSaksTapir@feddit.dk 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, if the guy really wants to be Elon and follow the example from the Twitter, then shutting down moderation to let the racism, homophobia and science denial run rampant is all part of the genius plan.

[–] knova@links.dartboard.social 8 points 1 year ago

It’s insane that any CEO would point to Twitter and say, “that’s the model we want to follow”. They are making like 5 figures worth of money on subscriptions, they have lost tons of advertising due to their content policies in the Elon era, and people generally feel unsafe so a bunch of people left the platform. What is redeeming about any of that?

I guess this is why Facebook spends millions of dollars on content moderation

Meanwhile reddit is shitting all over the people who were donating these millions of dollars worth of content moderation to them.

Anybody who invests in the reddit IPO must be an absolute idiot.

Seriously. There are tech companies out there which are 100% scams and they are better run than reddit. They do not understand how their own product works. DO NOT BUY!!!!

[–] TechyDad@beehaw.org 69 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Apparently, those subreddits are now not only open, but completely unmoderated. Reddit's solution was to remove the mods and put nobody else in charge. I'm sure that won't backfire in any way whatsoever! /s

[–] cavemeat@beehaw.org 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wait that's hilarious. I wonder how long because it all just fall apart under a pile of john olivers and shock videos

[–] useful_idiot@lemmy.eatsleepcode.ca 21 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Quality of posts on Reddit has nosedived over the last week.

[–] Hellebert@beehaw.org 22 points 1 year ago

Even if mods still want to continue modding their aubreddits you'd have to have taken a shot to the heart after years of free work with what Reddit is doing now. This has been one of the worst displays of ignorance and ungratefulness I've ever seen portrayed on an online forum that's supposedly operated by professionals.

[–] BashCat@wirebase.org 13 points 1 year ago

Perhaps we can learn from this. As I raised my whiskers from r/programming as it went dark and as took in the Reddit landscape. I dare convey the disgust of my view and what once was a fairly decent host of valid servers covering meaningful content and topics has became home to some of the foulest users and mods alike, hosting some of the most absurd and leud servers. Looking for another habitat for this ole cat, I found none.... r/programming is still down but even if it opens the doors under new moderation, I will not be returning as those that made the subreddit what it was will not be there, thus they may as well parse it with r/programminghumor and be done with it.

I am glad to see other programmers like @tyfi take a stand as well and break ground here. I'm hopeful for this small community. 🐈‍⬛

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 year ago
[–] ErikDemAbeille@latte.isnot.coffee 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

subreddits like r/askhistorians only work because of high quality moderators who REALLY know their subject matter.

I can see that working out beautifully.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Can_Utility@beehaw.org 15 points 1 year ago

Tubgirl for everyone!

[–] animist@lemmy.one 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Would be a shame if people just started posting tons of animal porn to them

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] notamichael@beehaw.org 66 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Seems reddit admins have taken a “get in line or get lost” approach to their volunteer mods. Let’s see how that works out for them.

[–] blindsight@beehaw.org 47 points 1 year ago

It sounds like this was done without any warning, too. Subs can, and have, changed their rules many times. Users voting to allow NSFW content is already precedented.

Unilaterally removing mods who are in direct compliance with your order to reopen the sub isn't a good look, particularly since one of the biggest drivers of this protest is the lack of communication with mods.

[–] cranstonapple@lemm.ee 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Let’s see how that works out for them.

Judging by the comments you get if you suggest switching away from Reddit, Reddit will do very well. I won’t be there, but they’ll be successful even if the site goes more to shit.

[–] NuPNuA@lemm.ee 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It is shocking how emotionally attached some people seem to be to Reddit and how they lash out when you suggest alternatives.

I wonder if it's an age thing, people pushing 40 like me have seen plenty of sites come and go an have transitioned with them. If you're under say 25, you may have been using Reddit your whole life on the internet.

[–] Something_Complex@beehaw.org 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Hey I'm barely 20, didn't use 3rd party slots, and I still migrated here.

Edit:3rd party apps*

[–] troyunrau@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Dialup BBSes->usenet->Slashdot->Digg->Reddit->Lemmy. I'm sure it'll happen again.

Lemmy really reminds me of those old BBSes though -- I'm connecting to my local server, it's federating messages like FIDOnet used to do, just much faster :)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] roofuskit@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

It's a bold strategy Cotton.

[–] Hellebert@beehaw.org 51 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Even if you wanted to stay as a mod you'd have to have taken a shot to the heart after all of Reddits shinanigans lately. Years of free effort and this is the thanks you get. Absolutely disgusting betrayal of people who have done a mostly fantastic job keeping the wheels on the beast all these years and I'm absolutely stunned they did it.

RIP Reddit as we currently know it.

[–] BashCat@wirebase.org 13 points 1 year ago

Irrefutable. 🐈‍⬛

[–] original_reader@lemmy.ml 48 points 1 year ago (4 children)

For a public spokesperson, this is such a hostile and condescending response:

Asked if Reddit could confirm the reinstatement, Rathschmidt declined, saying, “I’m not going to set a precedent of confirming with The Verge every action we do or don’t take to ensure users can access their communities.”

[–] bfields@thegarden.land 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That is a very strange reply, you'd think reddit would have the standard answers figured out lol. Especially for a company that wants to go public you'd expect spokespersons who give the "we are committed to our communities and their interests" answers.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] chaorace@lemmy.sdf.org 28 points 1 year ago

I quite enjoyed reading that quote. You can practically see the columnist rolling their eyes. Does this spokesperson not understand how to say "no comment"?

[–] PurpleReign@kbin.social 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He's just taking cues from the hostile behaviors he has seen at the top over there...

[–] Shhalahr@beehaw.org 12 points 1 year ago

"I learned it from you, Spez! I learned it from you!"

[–] Thalyssa@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago

I hope The Verge keeps tearing them a new one.

[–] heliodorh@beehaw.org 42 points 1 year ago

Lol how dare he frame this like he's firing employees for not doing their jobs. This isn't a job dipshit, it's unpaid volunteer labor that for some dumbass reason you think you're entitled to just for offering an empty room for people to walk in, decorate, and create community in. Honestly what a POS.

[–] runarskoll@beehaw.org 41 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

“90-plus percent of Reddit users are on our platform, contributing, and are monetized either through ads or Reddit Premium. Why would we subsidize this small group? Why would we effectively pay them to use Reddit but not everybody else who also contributes to Reddit?”

If I'm reading this correctly, this is blatantly assuming that he would rather loose those 10% of users who use third-party apps, than letting them use Reddit for free. He even calls it "subsidizing" them. The tricky part for the CEO-wannabe spez is to know how much of those 10% are content creators. Are users who use third-party apps more prone to post or not? Because let's face it, if he's betting on having a thriving social network trying to mimic tiktok, instagram, etc... he's light years behind. Reddit will never be the choice of shitty influencers and people mimicking each others dances. It's just too complicated of a network for such a basic user-base.

OR...he just wants to prep things up to sell and disappear. From everything I read, his Eloncrush is the most worrying part of it all.

[–] s_s@lemmy.one 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The 10% are nothing compared to the bot traffic he's about to claim are legit daily users on his IPO reports.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pixelbud@beehaw.org 37 points 1 year ago

“Moderators who changed subreddits to label them “Not Safe for Work” (and not available for advertisers) have been suspended by Reddit.” - The Verge

Crazy.

[–] UnhealthyPersona@beehaw.org 34 points 1 year ago

It's honestly crazy how poorly this whole thing is being handled. Reddit admins are really showing their true colors and keep doubling down on everything, making themselves look like absolute fools. They realized they don't have as much power as they wanted and are acting like grumpy children throwing a temper tantrum

[–] Shhalahr@beehaw.org 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

CEO Steve Huffman told me in an interview last week, “90-plus percent of Reddit users are on our platform, contributing, and are monetized either through ads or Reddit Premium. Why would we subsidize this small group? Why would we effectively pay them to use Reddit but not everybody else who also contributes to Reddit?”

It's called a "loss leader," Steve.

Dude's sounding like the kind of guy that cuts IT, security, and janitorial because they don't bring in revenue. But then, he did say he's following the Musk model. Which is, basically, that.

[–] Dusty@lemmy.dustybeer.com 18 points 1 year ago (5 children)

90-plus percent of Reddit users are on our platform, contributing, and are monetized either through ads or Reddit Premium

I wonder how many of those reddit premium members have cancelled their subscriptions. I know I did. I had premium for years as it seemed like a good way to give a little bit back to a site I was using multiple times a day, every day. As soon as Spez started his bullshit I cancelled it and won't be back.

[–] TauZero@mander.xyz 17 points 1 year ago (6 children)

All they had to do was offer API keys with Reddit Premium. Plug-and-play into your 3rd-party-app of choice. Can't believe those dum-dums chose to kill off their golden goose instead.

[–] krackalot@vlemmy.net 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I suspect they could've overcharged still, but just shut their mouths and continued as normal. Each new tactic is awful and self harming.

[–] TauZero@mander.xyz 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

All the 3pa's shut down business the moment the actual API prices were announced. This wasn't a protest move, the prices were simply 20 times higher than what they were promised and impossible to work into their business model. Reddit couldn't have overcharged and continued as normal - it was a deliberate move to kill off 3pa while pretending they are not. Reddit COULD have charged this API price to users directly via Reddit Premium, but failed to do so.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Tatiana@beehaw.org 16 points 1 year ago

someone should have shown this graph to the dipshits in charge

[–] parallax@local106.com 21 points 1 year ago

Not surprised but the look just gets worse and worse.

[–] potpie@beehaw.org 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Those fools. I'm not sure anything can save Reddit (from its admins & CEO) at this point.

[–] TheTrueLinuxDev@beehaw.org 8 points 1 year ago

And it not bad at all, they are making such a spectacular show of how every corpo social media fail and why everyone need to get off of there and run their own community that are federated/distributed.

[–] poudlardo@terefere.eu 9 points 1 year ago

We need to strike back with a coup

load more comments
view more: next ›