this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
111 points (95.1% liked)

Privacy

32130 readers
1080 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I hear many people say that the Google Pixel is good for privacy, but is it?

I'm asking this because I find it weird, of all the companies, Google having the most “privacy”.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] eruchitanda@lemmy.world 64 points 1 year ago (3 children)

You can install on it a lot of custom ROMs, including GrapheneOS and CalyxOS.

[–] EddyBot@feddit.de 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

additionally you don't need to jump across several hops to flash custom roms on Pixel phones (or tablets)
it's easy as using a web browser

meanwhile custom roms on Xiaomi or Samsung are a huge pita to setup and require almost shady looking korean or chinese (windows) applications

[–] eruchitanda@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

About how Pixel is more private.. Pixel 'only' has Google's tracking; other manufacturers have their own tracking, *on top/in addition* to Google's tracking.

[–] serratur@lemmy.wtf 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Installed GrapheneOS and adjusted my google settings to track everything they can, then I checked to see how much data that got collected, it is almost nothing.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml 33 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah. I thought it was weird, but the stock Pixel is very secure, and if you install Graphene OS, it is even more so. Additionally, Graphene OS sandboxes The Playstore Apps, and gives you much more control over what the Apps you install are allowed access to. You have to go way out of your way to make it less private than the stock OS, and you pretty much can't make it less secure than the stock OS.

You can get almost anything that works on the stock Pixel working on Graphene OS except for Google Wallet and the Android drive app. Banking Apps work, Google Apps work (but you might as well try to use alternatives).

I had an iphone for years, but after using Graphene OS for the past 3 months, I can honestly say I'll do everything I can to not go back.

[–] mctoasterson@reddthat.com 32 points 1 year ago (4 children)

GrapheneOS on a Pixel 7 is one of the best decisions I ever made. You can sandbox the shit out of all apps and granularly control the permissions in addition to outright cutting off network access to apps that would otherwise be doing background telemetry garbage all the time.

If you're terminally online and just can't imagine life without all the first party Google apps, you'll disagree with me. But otherwise it is a great decision. F-droid and Aurora Store are awesome. (You can still manually install and use stuff like the Google camera app, Maps and others. Just never sign in to first party G Apps, be careful with your permissions etc. and you'll retain 90% of the functionality while not having the privacy downsides.)

[–] beteljuice@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've been using LineageOS+MicroG with very little google software (only maps) and it's been working great. Any reason I should switch to Graphene? I noticed the main dev seemed to have some disputes and interesting personality characteristics, so I was a bit hesitant to adopt. I also had an irrational "I wouldn't be surprised if 3 letter agencies are involved" vibe about Graphene, but nothing concrete.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] jacktherippah@lemdro.id 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yes, it is. I mean, GrapheneOS is the gold standard for privacy&security, but even stock Pixel is a good step up. Think of it like this: on stock Pixel, only Google is tracking you, not Google + Samsung, or Google + Xiaomi. Just Google. It's guaranteed to be a step up from all other Android phones, stock or not.

[–] HerrLewakaas@feddit.de 35 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Wow the fact that this is considered good is depressing

[–] Asudox@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Technically it is just better than the worst possible case, which is two companies or more spying on you instead of one that was already spying on you. It is still bad but better than the worst case.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml 29 points 1 year ago

Install GrapheneOS on it and it will be. Remember, security and privacy are two different things. You can be very secure without being private, and you can be very private without being secure.

Google Pixels by default are pretty secure, but not private, at least not to Google.

[–] cooopsspace@infosec.pub 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'd argue yes.

I see Google as a known unknown, where as various other Chinese phones are unknown unknowns.

I acknowledge I have western bias, but the propaganda, human rights violations and control of the CCP is well understood.

At the very least Pixel let's you flash an alternative OS.

[–] jose1324@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Basically every Chinese phone has a great custom rom support

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 20 points 1 year ago

Not the stock os. You need to flash something else and relock the bootloader to take advantage of the pixel

[–] maudefi@lemm.ee 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Google Pixel hardware is focused on providing a private relationship between the user (your data and behavioral patterns) and Google.

Depending on your threat model you can flash custom roms to enhance your privacy and security posture.

A lot of folks here seem to be of the "...just flash GrapheneOS and you're good..." crowd but it's not that simple and there are trade-offs that impact usability and user experience.

There are a lot of interesting projects out there to choose from. Best advice is to work-up your real world threat model and do your reasearch.

You may find Louis Rossman's experience with GrapheneOS relevant: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4To-F6W1NT0&t=1

Here's a few links to help get you started - there are many android projects. I am not affiliated nor am I explicitly endorsing any of these projects.

CalyxOS https://calyxos.org/

LineageOS https://lineageos.org/

HavocOS https://havoc-os.com/

ResurrectionRemix https://resurrectionremix.com/

DerpFest https://derpfest.org/

PixelExperience https://wiki.pixelexperience.org/

GrapheneOS https://grapheneos.org/

[–] mojo@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Yeah the developer is very dramatic, but the project itself is still amazing. He did step down from lead, but the dude is a genius programmer. I'm still very confident on having it on my phone. I was using CalyxOS before, which I really like, but the sandboxed play services were a really killer feature for me on GrapheneOS.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Platform27@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It’s one of the better options.

For a start, even if you run it stock, it’s somewhat on par with the iPhone (depending who you ask). You’re trusting one company with your data, Google. You’re not trusting Google AND Samsung, or Google AND Huawai. It’s just Google. Plus Google does offer good security, so your data/device is pretty secure. In comparison to Samsungs Knox… while better than a lot of other Android security stuff, is kinda bad.

Though, the real privacy win for the Pixel, is it DOES allow you to modify it. You can remove Google’s version of Android, and change to Calyx or Graphine OS. Both of which are fantastic options, that allow you to really lock things down.

[–] loki@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Google claims to do some processing on their own tensor chip locally so it might reduce some data being sent to Google, but it doesn't limit them from tracking you. With Pixel, you are only being tracked by Google and not Samsung or other manufacturer

[–] KrokanteBamischijf@feddit.nl 3 points 1 year ago

Not sure how I should feel about that. It's highly likely any party engaged in tracking activities will try to grab as much data as they can. So a non-Google device seems like it would be doing twice the amount of data collection.

But considering Google also controls the hardware design of the Pixel, it wouldn't surprise me if they have some additional tricks up their sleeve.

What we really need is a full open-source phone, including firmware. Maybe we'll get there one day.

[–] Gadg3tm@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

A part of that is due to the fact that you now only have one company to worry about collecting data, rather than both the manufacturer(think Samsung) and then Google too.

They also play the best with options like Grapheneos or Calyxos

[–] candle_lighter@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago

Just install GrapheneOS. The only things that don't work on it are Google Pay and Android Auto.

[–] FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Who the actual fuck said this to you? Google is one of the worst companies for privacy.

I mean i guess with a pixel, you're just being spied on by Google rather than Samsung + Google if you buy a samsung android, so in that sense, sorta? But saying a pixel is good for privacy in general is an absolutely ridiculous statement.

[–] lunicoDee@feddit.it 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's because you install another OS on it

[–] vikingtons@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I sorely miss the hardware features from my previous phone, like a notification LED, MicroSD card slot and headphone jack, but I can't go back to a phone where I can't re-lock my bootloader after installing a custom ROM like CalyxOS or GrapheneOS.

MAC address randomisation is pretty neat too.

[–] drspod@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I can’t go back to a phone where I can’t re-lock my bootloader after installing a custom ROM

Is this something that only certain models of phone are capable of doing? Or is it a new Android/hardware feature that only new phones have?

[–] CatWhoMustNotBeNamed@geddit.social 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

It requires a flashed rom with a valid (key signature? Crap, forget what it's called).

If you flash an unsigned kernel and try to boot lock, it'll brick.

I get from an absolute security perspective why this is deemed important, I just feel there's a bit too much focus on it, as if an unlocked bootloader is really that insecure. It would still take tremendous effort to get the encryption key for storage, so it's pretty effectively secure still.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] vikingtons@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's specific to the bootloader of a given device. Most devices don't seem to support being locked with custom OS images using self signed keys.

[–] Azal@pawb.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

like a notification LED, MicroSD card slot and headphone jack

Ah, another Galaxy S9?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] darcy@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

I LOVE GRAPHENEOS

[–] mintyfrog@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

Google Pixel has the most support for security, which relates to privacy. It does "phone home," but likely only to Google. Removing all the Google software and installing GrapheneOS further hardens the security and vastly improves the privacy by stopping the "phoning home."

https://grapheneos.org/faq#future-devices

[–] zwekihoyy@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

pixels have the highest hardware security of all Android phones, which increases privacy potential. assuming you keep the stock os and default Google settings, though, it's about the same as any other.

Google also has good support for alternative OS'/Android forks, which is likely where that claim is leading to.

[–] Ocelot@lemmies.world 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Who says the google pixel is good for privacy? Google?

[–] Elektrobank@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

Pretty much everyone that knows about privacy focused phones. Ironic that google supplies the only way to avoid google. It will be a sad day when they lock android down.

[–] newIdentity@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

Well it really depends. They definitely are one of the most secure devices.

With the stock ROM only Google gets your data. So it's better than for example a Samsung device where both Google and Samsung and maybe some other companies get your data

Then with GrapheneOS its the most secure and private device.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›