this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2023
20 points (91.7% liked)

World News

32153 readers
786 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] infamousbelgian@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

If it works it wo...

never mind.

[–] IceMan@forum.basedcount.com 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’ve seen a video of US Navy using an Xbox controller (arguably for experimental weapon iirc but still). If it just works why overengineer it? I would be more concerned about that hull (scuttlebutt says it was just carbon over titanium frame, not titanium hull overlayed with carbon). However I guess we will have to wait until they find the boat to know the reason for failure.

[–] Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Much has been made of thos controller thing and I think it's getting overblown. I can not speak authoritatively on the safety of the sub or the whole operation but I am aware that off the shelf video game controllers are used for a lot of things including even military vehicles. It's a good controlling device for many things. Yeh it probably looks a little worrying when you step in to something being manoeuvered by a videogame controller, it's not good vibes or optics but, it's not itself a reliable signifier of anything really.

[–] frustbox@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, if they had not used an off the shelf part, then people would make fun of the janky controls with "levers and pulleys." The thing is a simple control scheme that's well understood and easy to learn. It gives inputs to an onboard computer which interprets pilot intent and steers the vessel (how ever questionable the vessel's construction might be).

Game controllers are used for all kinds of robots and vessels (often remote controlled) - so the fact they chose a controller does not weird me out at all.

Do I think they could have gotten a better quality controller? Yea, sure. Do I think maybe a wired controller would have been better? My gut says yes, but I don't know their decision making process and the engineering challenges with running cables.

[–] CMDR_Horn@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

And it was probably the best built component of the entire sub

[–] CoffeeBot@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

I don’t think that’s particularly bad. Logitech makes reliable input devices. I recall that the US Navy switched to Xbox controllers to control their periscopes on nuclear submarines and saved millions of dollars and found that people understood the controls better.

[–] amiwill@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

I don't see any issues with this as long as they had several fail-safes in case of hardware malfunction. US military subs us Xbox controllers because it's what people are comfortable with.

[–] z3n0x@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And to think a billionaire was on board.

[–] Malcolm@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

So it's not a total loss then?

[–] 8to32characters@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I mean, Logitech makes reliable stuff. But shouldn't they at lease have a player 2 MadKatz controller in a bin somewhere?

[–] PinkOwls@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I had a Logitech F310 which started malfunctioning, where the left stick's signal was always halfway to the left. Logitech's quality isn't what it used to be. I can imagine something like this happening on the submarine. Question is whether they had a replacement and if they even recognized that the gamepad was malfunctioning.

Fun fact: The Logitech Extreme 3D-stick is used in many professional systems, but those are reliable.

I feel like that's the different between buying something and repurposing it and buying something and using it as intended.

In other words. Use the right tool for the job. A hammer isn't a screwdriver just because you can technically hammer in screws.

[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

That is one of the least concerning parts of this lol, at least Logitech makes quality peripherals. If I had to choose a single manufacturer for input devices, it'd probably be them.

[–] nick_99@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

The US Navy uses game controllers to control their parascope.

[–] tekeous@apollo.town 1 points 1 year ago

Don’t know why this is news. I have those Logitech controllers still in service and they still work after years. Generic controller input works with everything.

Probably was the most reliable thing on the sun.

[–] Crow@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Imagine having to pilot a submarine with stick drift.

[–] Lubricate7931@feddit.uk 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Never mind the games controller. They bolt u in from the outside?! I'd never survive the panic attack

[–] TomHardy@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The submarine seems to have only one button for on/off... Did they think they can connect to iTunes there in case of some boot issues?

[–] Lubricate7931@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago

Hope they downloaded all the music to play offline

[–] Pantsu_Professor@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Should have used a Xbox 360 controller

[–] i_love_FFT@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

That's what we did at my job for industrial robots! These things are optimised to work well on Windows, which is at the core of many industrial computers... Build an equivalent with mouser or digikey? It'll cost 10 times more and use the same internals...

[–] Stanley_Pain@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They could've done a 360 and walked away....

If they did a 360, they'd still be walking forward...

[–] arefx@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If they are still alive in it what a nightmare they must be enduring right now, with only like 30hrs of oxygen left.

I feel like they likely lost pressure or some catastrophic failure and have been dead.

Or theogotec controller died and they drifted away and haven't been found.

Either way it seems really bad for those inside.

[–] mook@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I couldn't imagine being in a cramped space 2.5 miles under the sea with 4 other people waiting for that time. Horrific comes to mind but I don't think there is an adequate word for it.

[–] TiffyBelle@feddit.uk -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Stop mocking the missing Titan submersible for being piloted with a video game controller. Submersibles are more reliable when the devices used in them are kept simple, marine scientist says.

This is an interesting article that makes some good points. Why re-invent the wheel and potentially make something unnecessarily complicated and less reliable when simple items with simple electronics often have less that could go wrong?

[–] EvilColeslaw@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

I think most people are roasting their choice of game controller. The cheapo Logitech model. Plus if they wanted simple and reliable I would think a wired version would be better, not the wireless model. The military is all the time using them for controlling UAVs and stuff in the field. Nobody really pokes fun because it doesn't look like the cheap controller you'd hand off to "player 2".